Capturing power at any cost, aim of the Opposition
By K.M.H.C.B. Kulatunga
The Opposition coalition which supports New Democratic Front
candidate Maithripala Sirisena has now sealed its position as an
alliance which could rob Sri Lanka of its hard-earned peace.
 |
Chandrika’s leadership had
pushed the country to its lowest level. LTTE terrorism was at
its worst and over 12,000 had been killed during her tenure.
Here a destroyed plane at the BIA, Katunayake following an
attack by the Tigers. (File photo) |
Taking a close look at the stakeholders of the so-called joint
Opposition, it’s evident that they have only one thing in common while
they are far apart in all other issues. Their common aim is to beat
President Mahinda Rajapaksa at any cost and capture power.
They know that the masses are strongly behind President Rajapaksa who
could not be easily beaten at a Presidential election or his UPFA at any
other election.
The UNP which has tried anything and everything for an election win
but lost 29 elections under the tottering leadership of Ranil
Wickremesinghe, knows that it could not win a Presidential election even
if they bring rice from the moon.
Being acutely aware of that situation, Opposition leader
Wickremesinghe foregoes his opportunities to contest Presidential
elections. In 2010, he found Sarath Fonseka to contest under the UNP’s
support.
Lowest level
Five years later, Wickremesinghe is still searching for the winning
mentality. Hence, he has now given that ‘opportunity’ to former SLFP
General Secretary Sirisena under the blessings of the UNP. In short, the
UNP has failed to find a suitable candidate to contest a Presidential
election since 1999.
The UNP supporters know that their party does not stand any chance as
long as the UPFA is under the political sagacity of President Rajapaksa.
Hence, they did not mind getting even the devil to represent them and
beat President Rajapaksa and the UPFA.Former President Chandrika
Bandaranaike Kumaratunga had a score to settle from the day President
Rajapaksa was named the SLFP-led coalition’s candidate for the 2005
Presidential election. Though she now boasts of her ‘kindness’ to
appoint President Rajapaksa, she was compelled to do that as the
majority of the UPFA wanted him in one voice.
Moreover, Chandrika even in her wildest dreams did not think that the
UPFA would win the 2005 Presidential election. She thought that the then
Prime Minister Rajapaksa would lose and his political career would come
to an end. Chandrika had plenty of reasons to assume that the UPFA would
lose.
 |
Opposition leader Ranil
Wickremesinghe |
After being at the helm for 11 long years since 1994, Chandrika’s
leadership had pushed the country to its lowest level. LTTE terrorism
was at its worst and over 12,000 had been killed during her tenure. The
country’s economy was in a near state of collapse after the LTTE had
attacked strategic locations such as the Katunayake International
Airport, Colombo Port, Kolonnawa Oil refinery and the Central Bank,
killing hundreds of civilians.
The Chandrika regime ruined the country to the maximum and people had
no faith in her leadership. But things changed from the day Prime
Minister Rajapaksa was named the UPFA’s Presidential election candidate,
much to the surprise of Chandrika who had thought only a person from
Horagolla Walawwa could become an SLFP Head of State.
Slave
But President Rajapaksa beat all overwhelming odds and won the
election in 2005 at a time he did not even have the support of the SLFP
leadership. Hence, Chandrika wants to take revenge and settle a
political score due to the immense popularity the President commands.
On the other hand, Mangala Samaraweera blindly works for Chandrika
and appears to be a slave of the Horagolla Walauwa.
His sole intention is to bring Chandrika back to power, although he
now represents Ranil’s UNP.
 |
External Affairs Minister
G. L. Peiris |
But the most dangerous part is other parties and leaders in the
Opposition’s unholy alliance. Maithripala has already got the blessings
of the TNA after a secret pact with its leader R. Sampanthan. But the
TNA’s announcement to the Tamils in the North and the East, requesting
them to vote for Maithripala would only come just two days prior to the
Election Day.The Opposition has pleaded with the TNA to delay the
announcement as it would hamper getting the votes Maithripala expects
from the Sinhalese in the South.
LTTE sympathisers
In short, Maithripala wants to take not only the Tamils but also the
Sinhalese and Muslims for a good ride. The presence of extremist Tamil,
Muslim and Sinhala leaders such as Mano Ganeshan, Rishad Badurdeen and
Champika Ranawaka makes the Opposition an alliance that would rob the
ethnic unity we now enjoy, overnight. JHU leaders such as Champika
Ranawaka and Ven. Athuraliye Rathana Thera could never sit together with
people such as Sampanthan, Mano Ganeshan and Badurdeen, unless the JHU
had deviated from its original principles.
Strong LTTE sympathisers such as Sampanthan and Ganeshan would never
have extended their support to Maithripala for nothing. It is crystal
clear that Maithripala, in his lust for power, had promised the sun and
the moon to achieve his vicious political goals. The TNA would never
have settled for anything less than a separate self-governing body, a
virtual separate state, in the North.
In addition, they had demanded that President Rajapaksa be produced
in the international courts in Hague for alleged war crimes during the
humanitarian operation.
Hence, it is obvious that Maithripala and his cohorts in the
so-called common Opposition have promised all those to the TNA and other
extremist Tamil leaders, assuming that they could win the votes of the
near 700,000 Tamils in the North and the East.
Maithripala has been quoted in the media overseas as announcing his
intention to appoint a judicial tribunal to investigate war crimes
charges against personnel belonging to the Armed Forces.External Affairs
Minister Prof. G.L. Peiris had stated that it is a matter having
far-reaching consequences.
“A clear statement is, therefore, certainly needed from the
Opposition candidate with regard to the nature of the investigation
which he proposes to undertake, the powers and scope of the tribunal he
will appoint, and the findings of the tribunal,” he said.
Different approach
He also needs to clarify issues relating to the authority of the
proposed tribunal to summon and interrogate members of the Armed Forces,
Prof. Peiris said. The release said, “More broadly, statements have been
made by the Opposition to the effect that they will adopt a totally
different approach to the international investigation against Sri Lanka.
Here, again, they owe an explanation to the country as to the extent
to which the Opposition candidate will capitulate to the demands made in
the Resolutions against Sri Lanka. “These are demands which proved
unacceptable to a significant swath of the globe,” he said.
China, India, Russia, Japan, the Arab world and the overwhelming
majority of countries in Asia and Africa declined to support crucial
elements in the Resolutions. The country has a right to know whether,
for narrow political gain, Sirisena is prepared to make compromises on
this vital issue. Maithripala seems to be under the mistaken impression
that because Sri Lanka has not signed the Rome Statute, we are in no
danger.
This is obviously not the case. Recent experience shows that
countries which are not signatories can be vulnerable. “The Opposition
candidate, to please forces which are continually exerting pressure on
Sri Lanka, appears willing to sacrifice the country’s vital interests
and the safety of the Armed Forces, to help himself at the election.
While this has been a regular feature of the Opposition campaign, the
pledge to institute a judicial tribunal hits a new high. This is clearly
a matter which calls for clarification,” the External Affairs Minister
said.
Unworkable
The Presidency operates as a source of significant protection for
minority communities, because the whole country represents the electoral
unit at the Presidential election. The reform of the Presidency, and its
structure and role in the overall constitutional framework, cannot be
undertaken in isolation but as part of a comprehensive exercise which
also addresses other aspects like the electoral system and Provincial
Councils. These are closely interrelated.
Prof. Peiris, commenting on the recent suggestion by the Opposition
that the Executive Presidency should be refashioned to make the
President an umpire among different political factions within the
government, described this idea as totally unworkable.
This cannot be compared even with the ceremonial role of the
Presidency, as it was conceived in the Constitution of 1972. The
President can hardy serve the country and perform functions vital to
effective governance and protection of society as a whole, including the
minorities, if his energies are frittered away in an attempt to function
as arbiter among warring factions committed to different and
inconsistent policies on core issues.
This is the inevitable result of conflicting agreements with
different parties, some pledging to preserve and others promising to
abolish the Executive Presidency. How could those who demand powers
beyond the 13th Amendment to the Constitution such as Sampanthan and
Ganeshan work in the same alliance which has Champika Ranawaka and Ven.
Athuraliye Rathana Thera who are not even ready to grant what is already
there in the 13th Amendment.
There is no doubt whatsoever that they have teamed up purely to
capture power and settle their political differences which will
thereafter push the country to a point of no return.
This is indicative of the obvious lack of clarity in the Opposition's
thinking on major reforms. Such a situation would certainly harm the
national interest seriously.
Hence, the masses have to be extra careful when deciding for whom to
vote at the forthcoming Presidential election. It should not be a mere
opportunity for a change which the Opposition dreams of. We all will
have to decide on one thing – whether we want to protect this
hard-earned peace or not.
|