Scientists 'must be emotionally charged' about climate change
Prof Chris Rapley believes a narrative of insights based on
experience provides a powerful alternative to 'academic, fact-based
approaches'
Climate scientists must inject more emotion and personal experience
into their communications with the public to underline the dangers of
global warming, according to a leading professor.
Chris Rapley, a professor of climate science at University College
London, is urging colleagues to ditch "academic, fact-based approaches"
to the subject in favour of "charged" narratives. He recently performed
2071, a one-man show giving a personalised account of what climate
change means for him, at the Royal Court theatre in London and the
Deutsches Schauspielhaus in Hamburg.
Prof Rapley was prompted to do his show amid a growing realisation
that scientists were not communicating the dangers of climate change and
the importance of tackling it as well as they could.
"There is a growing recognition among the science community that
results that are emotionally, ideologically or politically charged need
to be communicated using a different approach to the traditional
'information deficit' method," Prof Rapley said. "A narrative approach
in which the scientist offers the insights based on their personal
experience provides a powerful alternative. But it is one with which
academics, trained to adopt an 'academic', fact-based approach, and
driven to satisfy professional norms of impartiality and objectivity,
find themselves uncomfortable."
He added: "Not all scientists have to engage with society as
communicators or as participants in policymaking, but a sufficient
number need to do so to justify society's investment in their science,"
he said.
It follows the warning from the UN's top climate-change official,
Christiana Figueres, earlier this year that the battle against global
warming is undermined by the use of "weird weirdo words" alienating the
public and confusing policymakers.
- The Independent |