CPJ’s 7 recommendations to: Revitalise Sri Lanka’s media industry
P resentation by Robert Dietz, Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to
Protect Jounalists, on the ‘The Status of Human Rights in Sri Lanka: An
Update since the Election of the Sirisena Government’ at the
Congressional Caucus on Ethnic and Religious Freedom in Sri Lanka held,
at the Capitol Hill, Washington DC on May 20.
 |
Journalists and activists
demand justice for Lasantha Wickrematunge’s murder, six years on
(freemedia.at) |
Along with many others, the Committee to Protect Journalists was
pleased to see the transition in Sri Lanka’s Government on January 8.
Having found ourselves maintaining a high level of animosity with the
previous Government, CPJ welcomes the new administration’s moves to try
to end the climate of threat under which journalists and media houses
operated.
We are glad to see websites unblocked and the expansion of editorial
freedom to State-controlled media outlets. We are glad to see the
Government encourage exiled journalist to return home. And we are glad
to see the Government take meaningful steps in enacting a Right to
Information law.
But there are few observers who feel these gains are vulnerable.
The lack of a clear understanding throughout the Government at all
levels, including civilian and military authorities, means that the
positive changes that have taken place can easily be reversed.
Some of those concerns lie within Sri Lanka’s political culture. But
for the media some of the problems lie within the industry itself.
CPJ continues to receive reports of Local Government’s interference
with reporters in the field. While it is commonplace in Tamil areas of
the country, it also occurs in other areas too. The central Government’s
relatively enlightened attitude toward media has yet to filter down to
the lower levels in smaller cities and rural areas.
Sri Lanka finds itself at the end of its internal armed conflict with
media that are heavily politicized, and not just along the obvious
Sinhalese and Tamil ethnic divide.
Many newspapers and magazines are beholden to powerful political or
business interests. Many editors and journalists say that their
reporting is constricted by those special interests rather than driven
by the professional standards of journalism. Those pressures are
exacerbated by years of rancorous political competition.
Younger journalists have never worked under any other conditions or
had the proper professional training to help them combat the dysfunction
in many Sri Lankan newsrooms. While there is still a tradition of
professional journalism in Sri Lanka, over the decades it has become
deeply frayed.
Underlying that reality are the deaths and disappearances of Sri
Lankan journalists under the previous Government.
They took place with a high degree of impunity. CPJ’s data show that
16 journalists have died for their work since President Rajapaksa first
held high office in 2005.
The causes for six others remain unexplained. Police and courts
failed to follow through on virtually every death or disappearance that
CPJ archived in that period. In the very few cases in which police did
get beyond even a perfunctory investigation, the cases became tied up in
lower level courts, and never advanced beyond a hearing stage.
Addressing the attacks on journalists with genuine police
investigations and courtroom prosecutions would be an important step,
but certainly not the only one, in improving the state of media in Sri
Lanka.
Practical recommendations
*The government must address the number of unprosecuted deaths of
journalists. An independent Commission of Inquiry seems the best tactic.
If not, establishing a special office within the Ministry of Justice
should be considered.
* While addressing that history of impunity, the Government must also
address the current negative attitude toward media at the provincial and
village level among Local Government, local police and military, and
local power brokers.
* Many of the non-governmental media support organizations promoting
freedom of expression issues suffered heavily in the past decade. The
Government should find a mechanism to revitalize them while not
compromising their independence.
* A Right to Information law was poised to be enacted this year. It
would have made access to information a fundamental right for every Sri
Lankan. But the Bill was lost in the shuffle in late April, with the
passage of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution. The 19th Amendment
took away the extreme powers of the President which the previous
Government had abrogated to itself. An improved version of the Right To
Information law is being developed. Once it is enacted, the current
Government must set the historical tone for implementing the act. The
concept of the right to information runs counter to the political and
bureaucratic culture within Sri Lanka. Enacting the law will not be
enough. Implementing it in a dynamic and forceful way will be critical
to its long term success. It must not be seen solely as a law for
journalists and media institutions, but for the country as a whole.
* The level of professionalism within the press corps must be
improved. The existing Sri Lanka Press Institute might be the best
institution to address the problem. This should be seen as a priority,
perhaps one for international donors to consider.
* Broadcast media form an important arm of the country’s media.
Broadcast laws and regulatory agencies remain antiquated. Unlike most
modern democracies there are few provisions made for public, commercial
and community broadcasters. The broadcast industry stands ready for a
large overhaul.
* Sri Lanka’s three State-controlled broadcasters have traditionally
been formatted to serve as a propaganda arm for the Government. They
should be independently funded so that they can serve the public with
editorial independence.
Rather than play the role of the Government’s mouthpiece within Sri
Lanka’s often rancorous political discourse, those broadcasters should
stand as an example of how journalism should be practiced.
Sri Lanka is on the path to return to a more open democracy. A
revitalized media industry will be intrinsic to that growth. The current
Government seems committed to creating the space for that re-emergence,
but for long term strength the media must build its own institutions to
insure that it can fulfill its role in a modern democracy. The
international community, which supported Sri Lankan journalists through
a very dark decade, should step forward to help them rebuild their media
industry. |