What Chile did right
by Dimple Vijaykumar
Earlier this year, an 8.1-magnitude earthquake hit Nepal, killing
more than 8,000 people and displacing nearly three million.
A few days ago, an earthquake significantly more powerful struck
Chile. The epicentre was near populated areas, just 175 miles north of
the capital Santiago, yet only 11 people died and only a few hundred
houses were damaged. Here’s why:
1) Earthquakes don’t kill people: Buildings do After being hit by the
planet’s largest-ever recorded earthquake back in 1960, Chile developed
strict anti-seismic building codes.
Despite this, an 8.8-magnitude earthquake in 2010 wreaked destruction
in southern and central parts of the country. More than 500 people were
killed by the quake and the tsunami that followed. More than 200,000
homes were flattened. Things had to change again.
Building codes were updated so structures could better withstand
seismic waves. Strong columns and weak beams meant buildings would have
a better chance of swaying with the tremors and avoiding collapse.
Pressure was also exerted on planners for any new buildings to be
constructed further from the sea.
According to Vicente Sandoval, a PhD candidate in Development
Planning at University College London and specialising in the causation
of disasters, the important point to note is that these changes weren’t
just on paper, they were actually implemented by the authorities.
“It is a matrix of circumstances and processes that allow the system
of building codes to support itself and work,” he told IRIN.
2) Information, information, information In 2010, right after the
quake, officials in Chile failed to give a tsunami warning before the
waves crashed in. “There was a delay in communications on how the
evacuation order was going to be interpreted and given,” recalled
Alfredo Zamudio, the Chilean director of the Internal Displacement
Monitoring Centre. “That caused the death of many people after the
tsunami.” Having learned from the past, better early warning systems are
now in place. The National Seismological Centre in Chile functions
around the clock since the government invested in a network of sensors
throughout the country to record seismic activity. If there is going to
be a big one, they’ll be alerted.
Two DART (Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis) stations,
which detect underwater pressure changes, were also added to Chile’s
northern coast in recent years as part of a more sophisticated tsunami
warning system. Along with this, sirens set up in coastal regions were
used by the navy to warn people of possible waves.
The Chilean public is made well aware of government powers during an
emergency; troops may be deployed to prevent looting, while aid can be
delivered to affected areas much faster. This results in “a respectful
relationship and a dialogue between civilians and armed forces,”
according to Zamudio.
The national media has also played a part by promoting online tools,
such as Facebook’s Safety Check feature, which asks those in the
affected region if they are safe and sends a message to loved ones once
their status has been confirmed.
But while such advances have helped, Zamudio is quick to add:
“Technology doesn’t reduce the impact of disasters. It is the community
when they are working together with the national government and when
community-based efforts are in dialogue with national authorities.”
3) A culture of preparedness Chile survived a big quake with
relatively few casualties because it was ready for it. For many years
now, local groups around the country have been familiarising themselves
with disaster preparedness plans, practising countless earthquake drills
and running through evacuation routes time and time again.
The result? More than one million people were evacuated from the
coastal areas in a matter of hours, escaping the tsunami waves, some of
which were 15 feet high in the region of Coquimbo.
Even young children are taught how to react if disaster strikes, as
their teachers make them go through classroom simulations.
Post quake, Chilean President Michelle Bachelet praised the people’s
response, and said the death toll was “unfortunate, but not very high
considering the strength of the earthquake.” The combination of
sophisticated early warning mechanisms and a prepared populace with a
plan of immediate action were key and something other countries can
learn from. 4) Civic engagement, political will and investment
Sandoval said, it was a watershed moment for civil society in Chile
after the 2010 earthquake. Disaster risk reduction was thrown into the
public spotlight as various public officials and organisations including
ONEMI were thoroughly scrutinised for their failure to disseminate
emergency information and prevent loss of life. Widespread media
coverage of the quake and tsunami also helped kick-start institutional
reform.
That civil mobilisation can change the tide. Reform of Chile’s
national strategies to deal with disasters was not only possible, but
also popular. “ONEMI will not exist anymore, probably next year.
We are going to have another institution that can deal with responses
to disaster risk reduction in the long term,” said Sandoval. “It was a
social demand. Until 2012, we also never had a disaster research centre
in Chile in any academic institution. Having a dialogue with the people
is pivotal, not only after an emergency to assess what is needed, but
also before a disaster strikes in the first place.
-IRIN
|