Syria: In search of peace
by Elise Labott and Raiph Ellis
The United Nations Security Council on Friday (18) approved a
Resolution that supports international efforts to seek a political
solution in Syria.
US Secretary of State John Kerry said, the process is designed to end
the nation's civil war and provide a new government in Syria.
Russia and the United States both approved the resolution, even
though it doesn't address the major issue separating those two nations:
What will happen to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad? Russia supports
Assad but the United States wants him removed.
Still, the accord was hailed as a major step toward bringing peace to
Syria, where a civil war has killed millions and sent thousands of
refugees fleeing into other nations.
"It's going to be uphill," said UN Envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura.
"It will be complicated. But it will be possible."
"This council is sending a clear message to all concerned," Kerry
said. "The time is now to stop the killing in Syria and to lay the
groundwork for a government the people of that battered land can
support."
New government
Besides recognizing the 17-nation International Syrian Support
Group's efforts in the peace process, the resolution provides a rough
timeline for political change in Syria.
It calls for "credible, inclusive and non-sectarian governance"
within six months and "free and fair elections, pursuant to the new
constitution," within 18 months.
The resolution, which passed 15-0, seeks a ceasefire in Syria. Kerry
said that ceasefire would not include ISIS. Kerry said, some Security
Council nations disagree on Assad's future but that nations involved in
writing the resolution didn't want that issue to stop the peace process.
Ending the war and bringing political stability to Syria go hand in
hand, he said.
"If the war is to end, it is imperative that the Syrian people agree
on an alternative in terms of their governance," he said.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned against the "demonization"
of Assad, which he said happened to leaders like Moammar Gadhafi in
Libya, who ended up being killed. That would not help the peace process,
he said.
The resolution has a schedule for changing the political situation in
Syria.
"We hope this process will not be protracted ad infinitum," Lavrov
said.
Senior State Department officials said that Kerry and Lavrov led
negotiations to fine-tune the text of the UN resolution.
The December 18 meeting of the International Syria Support Group βor
ISSG β the third in six weeks, sought to put in place a peace plan
reached by ministers last month in Vienna under the umbrella of the
United Nations.
The resolution does three things, which internationalize efforts to
seek a political solution in Syria. It endorses the 17-member ISSG as
the main body dealing with the Syria peace process; validates the peace
plan agreed to by the ISSG in Vienna last month, including a ceasefire
between the regime and opposition in six months and talks leading to
drafting a new constitution; and gives the United Nations a leading role
in working with the regime and opposition on negotiating a ceasefire and
drafting a constitution, which officials said is aimed at putting an
international stamp on the peace process.
International solution
Diplomats said that there was heated discussion among the nations
during the critical meeting about the list of groups that will be
considered terrorist groups and unable to take part in talks.
But they said, it was unlikely to affect passage of a UN resolution
giving international endorsement of the peace process.
"The consensus is that they won't reach consensus on the terrorist
list today," one of the diplomats said.
Spurred on by the deadly attacks in Paris, the 17 nations overcame
their differences on how to end the civil war in Syria and agreed to the
road map for a political transition now being worked on.
The United States and Russia have long split on the best path forward
in Syria. The United States supports groups warring with Assad, a close
Kremlin ally. Moscow, meanwhile, has been bolstering Assad with
airstrikes ostensibly aimed at ISIS, but more often, according to the
Pentagon, targeting other opposition fighters, including ones supported
by Washington.
Not only have Russian military strikes had a minimal effect on ISIS,
being mostly focused elsewhere, they have also exacerbated an already
dire humanitarian crisis.
Ceasefire and talks
But an increasingly bloodied Russia β now a target of ISIS β and
growing US urgency in resolving the 5-year-old conflict whose chaos only
strengthens the terror group, seems to provide some common ground for
finding a resolution to the conflict.
After holding marathon meetings in Moscow with Russian President
Vladimir Putin and Lavrov, Kerry said the United States and Russia hoped
to enshrine the agreed-upon road map for an end to the civil war in a UN
Security Council resolution.
The United States hopes a ceaseire between the regime and Syrian
rebels would allow Russia, along with the US-led coalition of Arab and
Western allies, to focus on fighting the jihadists.
State Department Spokesman John Kirby said, the meeting sought to
"better define" what a political transition in Syria would look like and
how a ceasefire could be implemented and monitored.
Still undecided is which rebel groups should be part of the
negotiations between the regime and the opposition, expected to start in
early January.
Repositioning Assad
The question of whether Assad could take part in the political
transition continues to be a main sticking point. For the past four
years, the United States has sided with Gulf States in calling for
Assad's ouster.
But this week in Moscow, Kerry raised eyebrows when he said "the
United States and our partners are not seeking so-called 'regime
change,' as it is known in Syria."
Some viewed Kerry's statement as an effort to placate his Russian
hosts. Kerry did add that the United States still did not believe Assad
"has the ability to be able to lead the future Syria," and soon after
his remarks, the State Department said the US policy that Assad should
go remained unchanged.
But Fred Hof, a former top US diplomat handling Syria now at the
Atlantic Council, warned that regardless of Assad's fate, until Russia
and Iran are willing to press him to stop bombing the Syrian people,
there is little hope the political process will yield any results and
that the bloodshed will end.
"Stopping the mass murder is a good place to start," he said. "How
the hell do you sit down for a peace process featuring compromise when
one of the parties doesn't accept the rules of the game and the other
party's constituency is being blown away on a daily basis?"He continued:
"The first symptom of Assad being under control would be an end to the
collective punishment and mass homicide and only then would the Syrian
people truly have a chance to decide their fate."
- CNN
|