2016: building a viable national future
In five days we welcome a new year - 2016. The beginning of this year
saw the beginning of major changes in the life of our nation: a change
at the apex of State leadership with the election of a new President
which, in turn, led to a change in government and a corollary radical
shift in national policy, in political conduct and, in style of
governance. A meticulously ordered parliamentary election mid-year
further entrenched the strategy for change.
What was this 'radical shift'? It has been a shift from a racist,
nepotistic authoritarianism in which not just one parliamentarian would
use her official vehicle and official guards to forcibly abduct an
individual citizen and 'warn' him on some family issue, but, any number
of governing coalition politicians at any level of governance from local
to national, would be prone to such wanton and brutish behaviour. And,
under the previous regime, such actions did not stop at a mere abduction
and scolding but, ended with the complete disappearance of people or, in
torture and murder, none of which was adequately prosecuted.
It is a shift from manipulative racism, corruption-ridden politics
and economic mis-governance at all levels on a massive scale that caused
more problems than solved them, to a relatively reduced incidence of
corrupt practices and arbitrary rule. A somewhat cynical citizenry may
be forgiven if, in their jaded state after a decade of blatant plunder
and brutish authoritarianism, they are content to view the greatly
reduced incidence of coercion and corruption today with some equanimity
presumably in relief that the nation has been saved from chaos.
But a citizenry that had the good sense to unite in an electoral
effort to end that chaos is not likely to remain blasé for long,
especially if current misdeeds are glossed over and worsen. Procedural
and behavioural discipline will impress and gradually reduce that
feeling of déjà vu. Corrective actions that redress malpractices will
reassure those less convinced of the genuineness and permanence of the
'change'. And the freedom to expose and denounce such mis-governance
will serve as a valuable safety valve for discontent.
The recovery from chaos needs more than just restraint and
discipline, however. Pro-active action is needed and, given the
concentration of intelligence and creativity in this coalition
government, it is not surprising that the 'National Unity Government' of
President Sirisena and Prime Minister Wickremesinghe has just such a
formula for national recovery. There is an impressive list of social,
political and economic goals already proclaimed ranging from
inter-ethnic harmony, de-militarisation and return to civilian life,
and, prosecution of plunder, to the repair of the bureaucracy and
judiciary, and, to a complete overhaul of the Constitution to create a
new foundation for national unity and social equity.
The implementers of this ambitious program, however, must, at all
times demonstrate to the watching and hopeful citizenry that there is,
indeed, a genuine 'national unity' among the political parties that make
up the coalition government. The basically competitive nature of
capitalist democracy must allow for some competitive spirit among the
political parties generally. At the same time, however, the specific
contingency of a national recovery necessitates restraint in that
competition to enable the spirit of collaboration to lead to compromises
that facilitate consensus.
As the Lord Buddha preached about governance in his time,
consultation and consensus is critical if the fundamental issues
confronting a State and its political community are to be fixed. As long
as individual political parties predicate their participation in
coalition government simply on a competitive drive for political
dominance in government, the space for consensual democracy will be
inadequate to achieve certain crucial political goals that can only be
achieved by that lost national consensus.
And the readiness for compromise is not only required from the
political parties. The various ethnic communities in the country as well
as the other socio-cultural and economic interest groups must also
engage with each other in that same spirit of collaborative deliberation
and compromise.
Furthermore, this inclusive process of consultation and collective
deliberation must extend far beyond Parliament and its elected members.
There is a need for the constitutional reform process to embrace the
varied professional, social, cultural, religious and gender groups in
our island society so that all citizens participate in and contribute to
the process of forming our renewed republic. Even as Parliament
functions as a 'constitutional assembly', the entire range of interest
groups should be provided with suitable platforms so that their
interests are also factored in and their creative proposals help
elaborate our new political association that will constitute our island
nation.
This is the only way that the Sri Lankan nation can re-invent its
statehood through a new constitution and a reform of the system of
governance at national and regional levels that will accommodate all
vital social interests.
2015 has been a year of change and of renewed hope in the future. In
the coming year, the national community steps forward with a new
excitement over the creative endeavours announced that will build that
future.
|