C is for corrupt
With rampant corruption and alleged vote rigging, Sri
Lanka Cricket remains one of the most unscrupulous sporting bodies,
while reform proposals that has ICC backers gathers dust.:
by Manjula Fernando
Sri
Lanka Cricket's (SLC) constitutional change is still a proposal that
hangs in the balance. To surmise that the document prepared by the now
disbanded Interim Committee headed by former Test opener Sidath
Wettimuny will be left to gather dust in a closet of the Sports Ministry
is too early. But it's been months since it was presented to the
government.
An effort by the Sunday Observer to discern where the tide is heading
met with pessimism as well as optimism.
When approached, Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekera outright refused
to comment on the hot topic. "I don't want to fall into traps where they
try to set me against the Prime Minister," he retorted, hinting at
possible hidden political undercurrents. He said he did not want to say
anything on the proposals submitted by the Interim Committee but fell
short of giving a reason for his reticence.
The Interim Committee appointed by the former Sports Minister Navin
Dissanayake early last year was deemed an independent effort to
streamline Sri Lanka's cricket administration which is alleged to be
mired in corruption. It has been reiterated by many in recent years that
drastic changes should be made before the local cricket establishment
becomes a joke in the eyes of the ICC and the cricketing world.
Election rigging
However, the newly elected Sri Lanka Cricket president Thilanga
Sumathipala was more forthcoming and ready with answers. He told the
Sunday Observer there were decisions that even they were not happy about
after the voting, but had been compelled to abide by.
He refused to take the blame for any election rigging and insisted
that none could claim Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) election was not free and
fair.
|
|
|
During election,
candidates run around winning over or buying votes, which is not
right
– Sidath Wettimuny |
None could claim
Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) election was not free and fair
– SLC President Thilanga Sumathipala |
I don’t want to fall into
traps where they try to set me against the Prime Minister
– Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekera |
"If that was the case, I am also among the aggrieved," he said,
adding that a powerful minister in the Cabinet manipulated the voting on
election day in certain ways.
Sumathipala, citing one incident, said both the Sri Lanka University
Sports Association and Nationalised Services Cricket Association had,
under pressure, abstained from voting. The voting member from the
Nationalised Services Cricket Association worked at the Sri Lanka Ports
Authority. The two Associations are said to have supported Sumathipala's
candidacy.
Asked if his position in Parliament as Deputy Speaker will clash with
his interests as cricket chief, Sumathipala said on the contrary SLC
will gain from the political clout that he enjoys as a Parliamentarian
and Deputy Speaker.
A key proposal in the Wettimuny report, which calls for sweeping
changes in the SLC Constitution, is the overhaul of the voting system
that elects members to run the sport's affairs. The reform proposals,
which are yet to be made public, are expected to reject the candidacy of
politicians.
Deliberations
But Sumathipala claimed that he had no idea as to what the Wettimuny
Report contained. He said SLC is planning a two- day workshop to come up
with suggestions for a strategic plan. "We will be seeking advice from
university academics and other experts", said Sumathipala.
The SLC is to call for an extraordinary general meeting thereafter to
present the outcome of this workshop. Without committing himself,
Sumathipala said they could refer to the Wettimuny Report during
deliberations at the workshop.
Responding to queries the former chairman of the Interim Committee
and veteran cricketer Sidath Wettimuny told the Sunday Observer he had
wrapped up his duty by turning in a comprehensive and impartial report
that he thought contained important proposals to revamp SLC.
Asked why the proposals have not been made public so far, he said he
was waiting for the Prime Minister and the authorities to take action as
he knew the Premier was equally keen to bring about a change.
"I certainly hope the proposals will be considered. I am not saying
the proposals have to be implemented in toto but something on those
lines need to be done to salvage Sri Lanka Cricket," said Wettimuny.
Before the proposals were penned the Interim Committee, on the advice
of the ICC, consulted the South African cricket board and the Irish
cricket board. The Interim committee chief himself spoke to the
presidents of the cricket boards of both South Africa and Ireland and
the concept paper is based on these models.
"What we have done will ensure there is accountability and
transparency, which is crucial for SLC's survival. So I am hoping that
something will be done. Even the minister agreed that this was a good
idea. And it's up to them now to act on it," Wettimuny said.
Fully supportive
He said Sri Lanka can learn from the Indian Supreme Court ruling to
their cricket board. Asked if keeping away politicians and government
servants from the cricket board is something that they too have proposed
just like the Indians, he responded in the positive.
When the spot-fixing scandal broke out in 2013 and the issue of the
arrest of three prominent cricketers went to the Indian Supreme Court,
the court appointed a panel to hear several cases relating to the Indian
Premier League (IPL) corruption.
The panel comprised a former Chief Justice of India, R. M. Lodha and
two former judges of the Supreme Court. Apart from the inquiry into the
IPL affairs, the panel was also asked to make recommendations to the
BCCI in reforming the governance model among other things. The report
has now been made public.
"The time is right and we should not sit on this," Wettimuny
declared. "The ICC is fully supportive to make the change and when you
have been given the green light and the support, we must grab it."
The ICC has said they will provide technical support to sit together
and draft a Constitution which will be accepted by them and the
government of Sri Lanka.
Wettimuny said to his knowledge it was the first time the ICC has
made such an offer to Sri Lanka Cricket or even discussed such a thing
with them. He assured the proposals will ensure accountability,
transparency and a far less complicated voting system.
One of the biggest issues facing SLC today is the number of club
votes at stake to elect the cricket board membership. South Africa,
Australia and New Zealand each have a mere seven or eight votes. England
has some 22. India with such a huge population has only 46 votes. Sri
Lanka has 147 votes.
"It is a joke and this solely contributes to breeding politicisation,
corruption and malpractice as the smaller clubs are at the mercy of SLC
and cricket godfathers.
"During election, candidates run around winning over or buying votes,
which is not right. We have a completely lopsided voting system where
certain clubs who get to vote do not even play Division Four cricket.
But they have the same voting status as the major cricketing clubs",
said Wettimuny.
Wettimuny said although manipulators will try to get around, the
system would ensure that there is transparency and accountability which
would better protect the game.
------------
C is for corrupt
With rampant corruption and alleged vote rigging, Sri
Lanka Cricket remains one of the most unscrupulous sporting bodies,
while reform proposals that has ICC backers gathers dust.:
by Manjula Fernando
Sri Lanka Cricket's (SLC) constitutional change is still a proposal
that hangs in the balance. To surmise that the document prepared by the
now disbanded Interim Committee headed by former Test opener Sidath
Wettimuny will be left to gather dust in a closet of the Sports Ministry
is too early. But it's been months since it was presented to the
government.
An effort by the Sunday Observer to discern where the tide is heading
met with pessimism as well as optimism.
When approached, Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekera outright refused
to comment on the hot topic. "I don't want to fall into traps where they
try to set me against the Prime Minister," he retorted, hinting at
possible hidden political undercurrents. He said he did not want to say
anything on the proposals submitted by the Interim Committee but fell
short of giving a reason for his reticence.
The Interim Committee appointed by the former Sports Minister Navin
Dissanayake early last year was deemed an independent effort to
streamline Sri Lanka's cricket administration which is alleged to be
mired in corruption. It has been reiterated by many in recent years that
drastic changes should be made before the local cricket establishment
becomes a joke in the eyes of the ICC and the cricketing world.
Election rigging
However, the newly elected Sri Lanka Cricket president Thilanga
Sumathipala was more forthcoming and ready with answers. He told the
Sunday Observer there were decisions that even they were not happy about
after the voting, but had been compelled to abide by.
He refused to take the blame for any election rigging and insisted
that none could claim Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) election was not free and
fair.
|
|
|
During election,
candidates run around winning over or buying votes, which is not
right
– Sidath Wettimuny |
None could claim
Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) election was free and fair
– SLC President Thilanga
Sumathipala |
I don’t want to fall into
traps where they try to set me against the Prime Minister
– Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekera |
"If that was the case, I am also among the aggrieved," he said,
adding that a powerful minister in the Cabinet manipulated the voting on
election day in certain ways.
Sumathipala, citing one incident, said both the Sri Lanka University
Sports Association and Nationalised Services Cricket Association had,
under pressure, abstained from voting. The voting member from the
Nationalised Services Cricket Association worked at the Sri Lanka Ports
Authority. The two Associations are said to have supported Sumathipala's
candidacy.
Asked if his position in Parliament as Deputy Speaker will clash with
his interests as cricket chief, Sumathipala said on the contrary SLC
will gain from the political clout that he enjoys as a Parliamentarian
and Deputy Speaker.
A key proposal in the Wettimuny report, which calls for sweeping
changes in the SLC Constitution, is the overhaul of the voting system
that elects members to run the sport's affairs. The reform proposals,
which are yet to be made public, are expected to reject the candidacy of
politicians.
Deliberations
But Sumathipala claimed that he had no idea as to what the Wettimuny
Report contained. He said SLC is planning a two- day workshop to come up
with suggestions for a strategic plan. "We will be seeking advice from
university academics and other experts", said Sumathipala.
The SLC is to call for an extraordinary general meeting thereafter to
present the outcome of this workshop. Without committing himself,
Sumathipala said they could refer to the Wettimuny Report during
deliberations at the workshop.
Responding to queries the former chairman of the Interim Committee
and veteran cricketer Sidath Wettimuny told the Sunday Observer he had
wrapped up his duty by turning in a comprehensive and impartial report
that he thought contained important proposals to revamp SLC.
Asked why the proposals have not been made public so far, he said he
was waiting for the Prime Minister and the authorities to take action as
he knew the Premier was equally keen to bring about a change.
"I certainly hope the proposals will be considered. I am not saying
the proposals have to be implemented in toto but something on those
lines need to be done to salvage Sri Lanka Cricket," said Wettimuny.
Before the proposals were penned the Interim Committee, on the advice
of the ICC, consulted the South African cricket board and the Irish
cricket board. The Interim committee chief himself spoke to the
presidents of the cricket boards of both South Africa and Ireland and
the concept paper is based on these models.
"What we have done will ensure there is accountability and
transparency, which is crucial for SLC's survival. So I am hoping that
something will be done. Even the minister agreed that this was a good
idea. And it's up to them now to act on it," Wettimuny said.
Fully supportive
He said Sri Lanka can learn from the Indian Supreme Court ruling to
their cricket board. Asked if keeping away politicians and government
servants from the cricket board is something that they too have proposed
just like the Indians, he responded in the positive.
When the spot-fixing scandal broke out in 2013 and the issue of the
arrest of three prominent cricketers went to the Indian Supreme Court,
the court appointed a panel to hear several cases relating to the Indian
Premier League (IPL) corruption.
The panel comprised a former Chief Justice of India, R. M. Lodha and
two former judges of the Supreme Court. Apart from the inquiry into the
IPL affairs, the panel was also asked to make recommendations to the
BCCI in reforming the governance model among other things. The report
has now been made public.
"The time is right and we should not sit on this," Wettimuny
declared. "The ICC is fully supportive to make the change and when you
have been given the green light and the support, we must grab it."
The ICC has said they will provide technical support to sit together
and draft a Constitution which will be accepted by them and the
government of Sri Lanka.
Wettimuny said to his knowledge it was the first time the ICC has
made such an offer to Sri Lanka Cricket or even discussed such a thing
with them. He assured the proposals will ensure accountability,
transparency and a far less complicated voting system.
One of the biggest issues facing SLC today is the number of club
votes at stake to elect the cricket board membership. South Africa,
Australia and New Zealand each have a mere seven or eight votes. England
has some 22. India with such a huge population has only 46 votes. Sri
Lanka has 147 votes.
"It is a joke and this solely contributes to breeding politicisation,
corruption and malpractice as the smaller clubs are at the mercy of SLC
and cricket godfathers.
"During election, candidates run around winning over or buying votes,
which is not right. We have a completely lopsided voting system where
certain clubs who get to vote do not even play Division Four cricket.
But they have the same voting status as the major cricketing clubs",
said Wettimuny.
Wettimuny said although manipulators will try to get around, the
system would ensure that there is transparency and accountability which
would better protect the game.
|