Opp. Leader R. Sampanthan: "Devolution is not
partition . . ." :
OMP law needs proper implementation
by Anurangi Singh
 |
R. Sampanthan |
While sticking to the basic Tamil political position for 'greater
devolution', Opposition Leader, TNA head and, Sri Lankan Tamil community
political elder R. Sampanthan last week would not specify areas for more
provincial powers, hinting at a possible softening of line by the Tamil
leadership.
In a brief telephone interview with the Sunday Observer on Friday,
the Opposition Leader expressed his views on the extent of further
devolution to be negotiated and the TNA's meeting with the UN Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon.
The TNA boss, earlier last week, in his speech in Matara while
attending a passing-out ceremony for trainees at the Samurdhi
Development Community Foundation, reiterated the need for further
devolution of power within the country and envisaged the formation of a
new constitution that incorporated provisions for devolution.
Excerpts from the interview:
Q: What were the main issues that TNA discussed with the UN Secretary
General?
A: The meeting with him went off well. We discussed reconciliation
and impediments to reconciliation, land issues, persons in custody, the
missing persons even though the Office of Missing Persons has been
established by law it needs to be implemented effectively to ensure that
the persons who complained that their kith and kin have gone missing are
given some satisfaction that there are proper investigations. For it the
law needs to be implemented properly.
Issues on resettlement, housing and livelihood need to be addressed
more effectively, if reconciliation was to take place. Then we discussed
the question on accountability and the resolution adopted by the UNHRC
which Sri Lanka is a sponsor and which must be implemented in better
spirit. We discussed the political solution and to ensure that such
political solution is with conformity with constitutional arrangements.
As the way in several parts of the world, which have a pluralistic
society as we have in Sri Lanka, multi ethnic, multi religious,
multi-lingual and multi-cultural society that we have in Sri Lanka. So
we discussed all these issues and also we discussed the role of the UN
and the UNHCR.
And we have had a very positive response. Mr. Ban Ki-moon assured us
that these issues will be addressed. And he was in agreement with regard
to many other matters.
Q: The Joint Opposition claims that the bill on the Office of Missing
Persons did not follow due process in Parliament; hence the
establishment of neither the office nor looking into inquiries was
achievable. What is your view?
A: I don't agree with the position held by the 'Joint Opposition'. My
position is that the law has been enacted and now the law needs to be
properly implemented. Merely the enactment of the law is insufficient.
Q: What are the perimeters of devolution that you are campaigning
for?
A: Everyone has talked about the widest possible devolution. Both the
UNP and also the SLFP, everyone in parliament has talked about the
widest possible devolution. So I'm asking for the widest possible
devolution of powers.
Q: The 'Joint Opposition' claims that the 'Sirisena-Wickremesinghe'
regime is on a voyage of separating the country. By making such demands
are you not fueling on their allegations?
A: I don't think sharing power is splitting the country. That is a
ridiculous position. We cannot be subdued by their ridiculous positions.
The government is not discouraged. And even Mr. Ban Ki-moon has conveyed
this message.
Q: At present, under the 13th amendment the powers of the government
have been devolved amongst the Provincial Councils, and there is
devolution of power, isn't this not enough?
A: What is in existence is inadequate. During President Premadasa's
time, Chandrika's time, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe's time and
even during President Rajapaksa's time there have been efforts to come
up with a new package. That is because what is in existence is
insufficient. |