Treasury moves to cushion deficit :
Short term plans to meet looming power crisis - CEB
by Rukshana Rizwie
In a nutshell:
*CEB’s requests for tariff increase squashed
* Energy Ministry assures consumers of no tariff increase
* Treasury to cushion 5% deficit
* CEB remains hopeful of short term fixes for power crisis
*Tenders to purchase mobile generators ahead of power crisis
* CEB to start cost cutting
In an attempt to insulate consumers from an increase in electricity
tariffs, the Finance Ministry has announced it would pay off the Rs.5.5
billion deficit of the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) within the next
six months, a move which experts say, will politicize and add to the
crises in the power sector.
Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake, before flying to New York for the
Annual General Meeting of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
hurriedly called for a press briefing, where he stated that the CEB
revenue shortfall of Rs.5.5 billion will not be passed on to consumers,
but borne by the Treasury.
Earlier this week, the CEB had written to the regulator of the power
sector, the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) requesting
a revision of the ‘End User Tariff Proposal’ for the period, October
2016 to March 2017 to bridge the 5% deficit.
It had indicated that a tariff increase would be essential to ensure
financial stability, and that subsidy will be returned through the
forthcoming government budget.
Increase in tariff
“In accordance with the Electricity Act, the CEB submitted a proposal
to increase tariff as a strategy to recover the 5% deficit. The matter
was referred to the Energy Ministry, which decided that it was not a
conducive period to increase tariff , and instead CEB would maximize
management strategies to cut costs,” a spokesperson for CEB, Sulakshana
Jayewardene told the Sunday Observer.
He said, the CEB may consider axing projects that are no longer
productive or address recurring expenditures. “We have initiated
discussions to ascertain ways and means of cutting costs, a process
which would take time.”
Power crisis of 2018
Jayewardene said, the CEB has taken into consideration the looming
power crisis in 2018, and was hopeful that many of the proposed short
term plans will avert the crisis.
“We propose to build a 300 megawatt LNG power plant at Kerawalapitiya,
100 megawatt duel fuel, which can be converted to a barge mounted power
plant at Hambantota, 100 megawatt wind power at Mannar, 20 megawatt wind
power at Chunnakam, and 20 megawatt solar power in Polonnaruwa and
Valaichchenai,” he said.
“We have also launched a solar power project where consumers can give
back energy to the grid. We hope to get 100 megawatts by 2018 and 200
megawatts by 2020 through these initiatives,” he said, adding that they
will bridge the 500 megawatt deficit.
Jayewardene said, the CEB was also in the process of purchasing 50
megawatt portable/mobile generators which can be shifted to locations
that need power the most, during a crisis, for which tender documents
have been prepared and submitted to the procurement committee for
approval. When inquired if there were any plans to increase tariff next
year, he said the CEB would consider it only as a last resort, in the
event the projects fail to meet energy demands.
PUCSL’s role
The PUCSL is mandated to set power tariffs every five years with
periodic revisions every six months. “There is an approved tariff
methodology which has been in place since 2010, which looks at vector
costs such as transmission and distribution; and adjusts tariffs every
five years,” said Kanchana Siriwardena, Director of Tariff and Economic
Affairs at PUCSL. “With reference to generation, as there are several
external factors such as weather that affect it, we look at revisions
every six months,”he said.
Siriwardena explained that the CEB has submitted a revision to amend
generation costs for six months starting from October this year.
It is learnt that both the PUCSL and CEB have been unofficially
informed of a move by the Treasury to cushion the effect of a deficit,
however there is yet to be a policy decision on the matter. |