data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/531a4/531a4060b1a4aa7c5209e2e4bdb323aecf3ca9ac" alt=""
Drama in full flower
by Tissa Devendra
Title: "The Play is the Thing"
Author: Henry Jayasena
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7b07/b7b072fec67065e6d0338d4da476f0e470ceafbd" alt=""
‘Henry Jayasena, our National Treasure’
|
Way back in the early 1940s when the incomparable Rukmani Devi trod
the stage, in a make-shift, cadjan-roofed "theatre" in Gampaha, little
did she imagine that the goggle- eyed little chap in shorts, perched on
the creaking plank of the 'gallery', would be inspired by her to
dedicate his life to Sinhala theatre" and become its greatest exponent.
Henry Jayasena was that boy, and through his book - "The play is the
Thing" which will be launched tomorrow he leads us effortlessly, and
modestly, through his pilgrimage to the summit. He writes with lucid
simplicity of his willing involvement in dramatic activity .
He was one of the 'stable' of precocious brats who acted and sang in
Siri Aiya's vastly popular children's programmes on radio. Trilicia
Abeykoon (later Gunawardena) and Karunaratne Abeysekera were also in the
team. Alas, both have long flown away to that great theatre in the
heavens.
'Siri Aiya' was the stage name of the talented U.A.S. Perera who
taught Oriental languages at Nalanda Vidyalaya before it, ill-advisedly,
gentrified its Founder Malalasekera-given title to "College".
Henry's first-ever dramatic role was as Prince Rohitha in the UAS
production of the Sanskrit classic "Harischandra" with a cast of
students and teachers.
Henry J intersperses his accounts of plays, actors and the modern
Sinhala theatre with snappy little anecdotes from his boyhood and youth
both inextricably intertwined with plays and play acting.
His description of his time as a 'tyro Ingirisi Mahattaaya' in
Dehipe's little hill-top school evoked nostalgic memories, of a few
years later, when I trudged up its 'maana'-scented paths as a field
officer 'on inspection'.
Dehipe inspired the always persuasive Henry to win the Headmaster's
approval, as well as his acting skills!, to produce Janaki based on the
Ramayana. It was a huge success in that little village but also, sadly,
Henry's swan-song in Dehipe. He was now appointed to a clerical position
in the Public Works Department where he was to spend his public service
career.
On the face of it a humble position but it became the springboard for
Henry's theatrical success.
How this came about opens a window into an age far more civilised and
less frantic than today's.
The Secretariat already had a Sinhala Drama Circle which welcomed
Henry and had a pool of talented actors The first play produced was
Handahana by T.B. Ilangaratne who had started his career as a clerk and
was now a Minister! Needless to say, the play was a success.
Inspired, Henry now wrote Manamalayo, his own adaptation of
Sheridan's Rivals. What is interesting is the fullest approval and
support he received from the genial Head of his Department and the
active encouragement of his Deputies.
I am not going to describe the progress, ever upwards, of Henry's
dramatic career which he does himself with charming modesty and
simplicity. I will comment on some aspects that have impressed me.
One of these I have referred to in the preceding para the
understanding and support of his official superiors of the
'non-traditional' activities of Henry and his colleagues. They were
truly 'complete' men, well-read and cultured in the best sense of the
word, and thus appreciative of good drama and the effort that went into
it. Most of Henry's work was produced in that cultural dawn of '1956'
and all that it came to mean.
Maname was the pioneer in inspiring a crop of Sinhala plays, of
varying quality. Henry's productions led the field. A small army of
inveterate theatre-goers now flocked to enjoy the latest Sinhala plays.
They were generally staged in the modest halls of the Borella YMBA
and Lumbini Vidyalaya. The price of tickets rarely exceeded single
digits! Popular plays went on tour to major provincial towns where they
were enthusiastically received. All actors were amateurs and Henry gives
a vivid account of the camaraderie enjoyed on their bus journeys to and
from outstations.
These halls were often inadequate and ill-lit requiring instant
improvisation but audience appreciation was of the highest level.
A moving episode that Henry describes is when the cast of Apata Puthe
Magak Nethe visit the humble line-room of the poor stone-breaking woman
whose son's suicide inspired the play.
Her parting words eerily echoed "the very same sentiments expressed
by the mother in the play" I have nothing to live for, but I will live
on. "Another inspiring characteristic of this period was the good
rapport that developed between the better Sinhala dramatists, the
University and the "English-speaking elite".
Sinhala plays were reviewed by respected critics such as 'M de S' and
'E.C.T.C' in the English Press. Sarachcandra co-opted Henry to act as
Prince Maname, Chitrasena was Othello in an "English" production, my
DramSoc contemporary Irangani Meedeniya (later Serasinghe) and Karen
Breckenridge joined Henry's plays. It was a wonderful era.
There was no back-stabbing when Henry was selected, purely on the
strength of his achievements, to study drama in Soviet Russia and
Britain.
Reading his account of Soviet life with its strange mixture of
austerity and obsession with cultural activities is like a trip into the
past in a time machine . Thanks to this journey we became the richer
with
Time never stands still. Long before TV began driving nails into the
coffin of Sinhala drama it had begun to atrophy in an atmosphere of
political suspicion and intolerance. Henry describes his skirmishes with
political panjandrums, with wry amusement,in his later chapters.
All lovers of theatre and drama should read this, eminently readable
book, from cover to cover, and be grateful to Henry Jayasena, our
National Treasure, for this invaluable contribution to our nation's
cultural history.
Security
The influence of India on Sri Lanka:
by Yamani de Silva
This book by Prof. Liyanagamage gives out a fascinating description
of the influence of India on the security of Sri Lanka.
The author observes that the first recorded inroads into the island
was by too Damilas (the term used for Tamils in chronicles) named Sena
and Guttika who conquered king Suratissa and reigned together for 22
years.
The second being that of Elara of noble descent who overpowered king
Asela and ruled Rajarata for 44 years.
All three were from South India and Elara namely was from the cola
country. King Dutugamunu was able to defeat Elara and bring Lanka under
one flag. The author observes here that after the defeat a nephew of
Elara named Bhalluka landed in the island with a force of 60 000 men to
regain the fortune of Elara but was shortly afterwards, defeated.
Prof. Liyanagamage makes a nice observation here that the Sinhalese
never were after ethnic differenciation but were against the Damilas
because they always happened to be invaders.
There is a brief discussion on a third and a fourth invation by South
Indians namely by seven Damilas who had reigned for 14 yrs and 7 months
one slaying the other and by a cola invation where 12000 Sinhalese were
taken prisoner to South India. King Gajabahu was successful in bringing
back the prisoners and the alms bowl of the Buddha which was taken to
India by one of the seven invaders.
Thus King Gajabahu becomes the first Sri Lankan ruler to have invaded
the Indian mainland to avenge the rulers who made inroads into Sri
Lanka. The 5th inroad was by six Damilas who reigned Rajarata for 25
years till King Dhatusena conquered them.
After these invasions the Sinhalese rulers hit upon the fact for a
need to protect the land from foreign invations. Thus in 1st century BC
Kulakanna Tissa built a wall around the city. Less than 100 years later
king Vasabha made this into a 25-27 ft high wall King Gajabahu I set up
defences around the sea coast. Another king Silahala sent one of his
sons in charge of the sea-coast.
Some Kings like Abhayanaga and Moggallana I took the help of South
Indian armies to help defeat those Damilas within the island. These
armies mingled with the locals and the Tamil population was increased.
All these invasions discussed were carried out by adventures. The Kings
later had friendly ties with South Indian rulers as another tactic of
avoiding invasions by the Indian mainland.
The first recorded invasion organised and carried out by a South
Indian political power is that of the Pandya King. While invading, the
Tamils of the island joined him and the Sinhala King fled the capital of
Anuradhapura.
The invaders robbed the treasury and damaged the dagabas and took
valuables attached to the temples, not like the earlier invaders who
respected the Buddhists and their heritage. Later the Pandyan King came
to a treaty with Sinhalese King Sena I and went back to India.
Later due to the mismanagement of the last two Kings of Anuradhapura
Kingdom the island became pray to the cholas again and vast changes were
done with the destruction of Buddhist monasteries.
The capital was changed to Polonnaruwa with a new name Jananathapuram
and Hindu shrines were built. This occupation lasted a little over half
a century (1017-1070). However Southern part of Ruhuna was ruled by the
Sinhala rulers.
Prince Kassapa renamed Vikramabahu I managed to defeat cola invasions
to Rohana and was determined to free Rajarata from the colas but
unfortunately he fell pray to a disease and died when young. Thereafter
several princes from North India and Pandya ascended the throne but was
defeated by Colas after a reign of about 2 to 4 years.
By the middle of the 11th century, events were moving in a direction
which led to a positive change in the political scene in Rohana. A
distant relative of the Anuradhapura royal clan had escaped to Rohana
with the protection of a chieftain named Buddharaja.
Vijayabahu later pursued the retreating cola army and inflicted upon
them a crushing defeat. Following this victory his forces marched to
Rajarata and captured Polonnaruwa. After this the cola emperor in South
India took personal interest in the island and sent a larger army to
defeat Vijayabahu.
The Sinhala King was forced to abandon Polonnaruwa and went to
Valagiri (valirigala in Kegalla district). Having revamped his forces
Vijayabahu was now ready for a final assault on Rajarata. He attacked in
two ways this time.
One targeting Anuradhapura and the other Polonnauwa. The grand
operation was a success. Port of Mahattitha was captured, preventing
supplies and reinforcements from cola capital reaching the cola forces.
In his 15th regnal year Vijayabahu emerged victoriously in Anuradhapura.
The author stresses the fact that Vijayabahu's encounter with the
invader this time was very different from all previous inroads and
invations from South India over the centuries, in the sense that the
challenge originated from a powerful empire which was the dominant power
in South India.
With reference to his final victory the Chulavamsa observes "But when
the Ruler of the Colas heard of this distinction of his army, he thought
'the Sinhalas (too) are strong' and sent out no further army. This
victory stands out in the history of Sri Lanka that Paranavithana claims
that "Had there been no Vijayabahu there would perhaps have been no
Sinhalese today."
Vijayabahu later came upon the fact that friendly ties with India is
healthy for the independence and integrity of Sri Lanka thus gave his
sister in marriage to a Pandyan Prince and he himself married,
Tilokasundari, a Kalinga Princess. After this Sri Lanka enjoyed four
decades of relative peace and stability.
After Vijayabahu's death in 1110 AD it was King Parakramabahu I who
got control over the entire island and also kept the enemies at bay.
During his reign of 33 years he not only kept armies at bay but he also
sent forces to South India to help friendly rulers to outset their
enemies.
After king Parakramabahu's death his military leaders tried to gain
power. Parakramabahu's window queen Lilawathi occupied the throne on
three different occasions. She had to compete with rulers from Kalinga (Orissa
in Eastern India).
In the year 1215 there was a massive invasion of the island by Magha
of Kalinga. The author observes that this was the worst of invasions
with Magha and his Kerala warriors cutting hands and feet of the people,
robbing the rich, robbing cattle, destroying many a chetiyas, viharas
and harming the Buddhist order. Magha forced the people to adopt a false
faith and converted the vihara and pirivenas to dwellings of his
warriors.
The Buddhist Sanga had to flee Rajarata and seek safety in Rohana and
the Hill country, so did the ruling class. Magha's reign of terror
lasted a full 40 years.
Magha took upon himself the task of safeguarding the island against
foreign threats by enforcing defence strategies along the north-western
and North-Eastern coastlines.
The strength of 24000 at the time of invasion rose upto 44,000
Damilas and Keralas at later stages. At this stage cola power has
declined and Pandyan power had reached its high watermark.
King Parakramabahu II managed to defeat Magha and took the help of
Pandyan armies to defeat Candrabhanu who was a Malay invader. However
the Pandyans made Candrabhanu's son the king of Rajarata and continued
to influence Sri Lankan politics. Their invasion went far as Yapahuwa
and carried away the sacred Tooth Relic.
This was brought back by Parakramabahu III after friendly
negotiations with the ruler of the Pandus. Then Parakramabahu VI
(1412-1467) became the last great Sinhalese ruler to hold a more or less
unified island, prior to the arrival of western nations in the early
16th century.
In an overview, the author observes that the island was not
politically influence by India as a whole but it was South India that
made a marked imprint. It is also stated that the Sinhalese rulers had
two tactics one being strengthening the defences of the island and the
other being having friendly ties with the Pandyans and opponents of the
Colas.
He also observes that all the time these invasions took ground the
Southern part of the island, Rohana, was under the Sinhalese kings as an
independent and free province.
Prof. Liyanagamage moves on to say that these invasions had not led
to the emergence of feelings of hostility towards India. Buddhists kept
on visiting the sacred shrines in North India to this date.
The scholars studied Sanskrit and quite a few epigraphic records are
found in Sanskrit. The wish of several heros of the island was to be
reborn in Jambudipa like Chief Kappetipola and Anagarika Dharmapala. At
the height of South Indian invasions Buddhist clergy found sanctuary in
South India itself and maintained most cordial and lively relations with
Buddhist establishments in South India.
Like the cultural relations, political rivals and military
confrontation do not seem to have interrupted commercial relations
between Sri Lanka and South India.
The author observes that the South Indian invaders were no different
to their neighbours. When the Colas were invading they invaded not only
Sri Lanka but also Kerala, Pandya and Karnnata. Therefore all the
evidence show that the invasions of Sri Lanka by South Indian rulers
were propelled by the mechanics of power-politics and not by racially
oriented motivations.
Prof. Liyanagamage points out an important outcome of the invasions
that they led to a growth of the settlements of South Indians, mainly
Tamils, in Sri Lanka. These developments were also due to commercial
relations with South India and the Northern parts of Sri Lanka and also
the friendly armies that came to help the Sinhale Kings are most
unlikely that the whole armies left the country.
The transformation of these settlements into a political entity, with
its capital located at Simhanagara in Jaffna Peninsula, beginning from
the 2nd half of the 13th century is an important development in the
history of Sri Lanka.
This book I feel should go to school libraries as supplementary
reading and a Sinhala translation is most welcome. |