The world needs ‘change’
A new era in world politics:
by Samangie Wettimuny
[email protected]
The newly elected parliament of Pakistan will meet for the first time
on the 17th of March and the Pakistani People’s Party(PPP) of the late
former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto is expected to nominate a Prime
Minister.
The coalition of Pakistani People’s party(PPP)(led by Asif Ali
Zardari, Pakistan’s Muslim League-Nawaz (led by former Prime Minister
Nawaz Sharif), the Awami National party (Pushtun) and Jamial Ulama-i
Islam is now strong with over 66% of seats of the National Assembly.
They now have the required two thirds majority which may allow them
to amend the constitution and to over-rule President Pervez Musharraf.
In return for joining the PPP as a junior partner , the Muslim League-
Nawaz has been granted its major wish, the promise to attempt to
reinstate the High Court judges who were dismissed from power by Pervez
Musharraf.
Hence it seems that Musharraf’s era is gone and at the recently held
election, Khurshid Kasuri, the former foreign Minister under Musharraf’s
government even lost his seat.
Pakistani People’s Party have always been in good terms with India
and under the new government too it would be the same. In fact the PPP
and India’s Congress Party have always been Leftist parties. Apart from
political links, the two parties have personal links as well. The
founder of the PPP, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s mother was an Indian.
Situation in India
India’s External Affairs minister, Pranab Mukherjee has ruled out
early elections as the allies were not in favour of it. Since 61 out of
545 Lok Sabha seats are owned by the Left,the ruling Congress party
finds it difficult to go ahead with the Indo-Us nulear deal. The Left
Front threatened to withdraw its support unless government was willing
to give up its nuclear deal with the U.S.A.

UPA chairperson
Sonia Gandhi |
According to the Left Front the deal is a threat to the country’s
security and dignity In fact the Left Front and the other members of the
United Progressive Alliance were due to meet yesterday to hold talks on
this matter. As the critics say ,more likely the dispute will leave
India stuck with a lame-duck government.
As mentioned in India’s “The Economic Times” ( March 07, 2008): “The
Left’s pull out threat may force the government to dump the Indo-US
nuclear deal.” “A clear indication was available on Thursday (March 6)
when External Affairs minister Pranab Mukherjee said “a minority
government cannot sign a major international agreement because of the
risks involved.”
As mentioned in the newspaper the macho sections in the government is
getting ready to go ahead with the next step of the agreement. But
Mr.Mukherjee, the government’s chief negotiator in the pow-wows with the
left had made it clear that it was not an easy option.” “A minority
government cannot, need not and should not sign a major agreement like
this” he said in an interview to a weekly.”
The minister has also said that the primary concern of the party is
the survival of the government. Thus he had made it clear that the deal
cannot be operationalised at the cost of power at the centre.

India’s External Affairs minister
Pranab Mukherjee |
In “ The Indian Express” (March 7,2008), it is mentioned how the CPM
General Secretary Prakash Karat has sought a meeting of the United
Progressive Alliance- Left coordination committee before March 15 in a
letter to its Chairman- the External Affairs Minister. There he mentions
that the government is mistaken if it thinks that after arriving at an
agreed text with the IAEA (Indo-US deal) on a safeguards agreement ,
they can proceed to take the next step for operationalising the
agreement.
In that letter Karat has warned the government that it is for the
Congress leadership to decide whether it wants to be seen as kowtowing
to the pressure of the Bush administration or acting democratially and
heeding the voice of parliament and people.
Both CPM and CPI are scheduled to hold their party conferences later
this month- CPI in Hyderabad on March 23 and CPM in Coimbatore on March
29
.In the political resolutions of both parties, blocking the nuclear
deal is listed as one of their successes during the UPA rule.
Anyway Pranab Mukherjee is expected to visit the US on March 23-24
possibly with the IAEA draft agreement.
Left leaders have also said that they do not want to discuss the
merits or demerits of the IAEA agreement claiming it cannot alter the
situation as far as the Hyde Act is concerned.
Russia and Medvedev
Dmitry Medvedev beat the voting record of Vladimir Putin which he set
during the presidential election of 2004. Medvedev received the support
of over 70 % of Russian voters and it has been viewed as a sign of
political stability. In fact it was Vladimir Putin who could bring
Russia back to her former prestige.
About fifteen years ago,International Monetary Fund refused to grant
a loan of US$ 5 billion to Russia , but ironially today the country’s
foreign reserves are at US $ 480 billion. Russia is the world’s second
largest crude oil producer and the gas producer thanks to Vladimir Putin.

Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin |
‘Dmitry Medvedev’s chief qualification for the presidency is his
loyalty to his mentor, Vladimir Putin’ stated ‘Newsweek’ in its March
3,2008 issue. As “The Wall Street Journal” (March 4,2008) mentions;
“Sunday’s electoral rubber-stamp of a new Russian president - the 42
year old lawyer Dmitry Medvedev marks the start of a period of some
uncertainty.
According to the journal ,Putin made sure that power would stay in
his hands. He handpicked a successor best known for his loyalty and
political weaknesses.
However, “overtime, he may even be so bold as to have his own ideas
and wish to build a power base independent of Putin. The young lawyer
has given a few signs that his views of Russia’s role in the world would
differ from those of his boss.
“As Russia becomes more powerful , many people get irritated.” The
West would prefer Russia stay “a sort of upper volta with nuclear
missiles” ...’ Now we have begun to show our teeth in moderate fashion”
As the journal observes in recent months those teeth were bared
against Ukraine, Georgia, Nato expansion , the US missile shield in
central Europe , Kosovo independence and efforts to stop Iran from
gaining the power of the nuclear bomb.
Anyway how far will Russia’s new president Medvedev emerge from the
shadow of Putin, the man who will be his Prime Minister?The whole world
is anxiously waiting to see.
In fact the world ‘audience’ is now watching Russia’s “ Subha saha
Yasa ”!
“Wine track” and “beer track”
While the two main US Democratic presidential canditates, Hillary
Clinton and Barack Obama go on accusing each other of negative
campaigning , the famous “Eonomist”magazine (March 8th-14th)in its
article “Obamaworld and Hillaryland” talks about “A famous politial
distinction “- a queer one.

Barack Obama |

Hillary Clinton |
“ A famous political distinction exists between “Wine track” and “
Beer track” democrats.Wine track Democrats have traditionally supported
reform- minded liberals such as Gary Hart and Paul Tsongas. Beer-trak
Democrats have preferred more practical minded polls.”
While Hillary belongs to the Upper Class Democrats, Obama comes from
the lower class Democrats. |