Revolution in Venezuela and Chile
Meeting with Chilean President Michelle Bachelet
IT doesn’t matter what I say about our friendly meeting; some news
agencies and publications will take the information and say the old man,
the one convalescing from a serious illness, or some other adjective
aimed at reducing the modest value of what I told my prestigious
interlocutor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de4bc/de4bc1e8c7576e17aef0e299a9c1ade0e2dfe490" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c82e/5c82e8dd2f13aa9982320aaca65f0c26e54ceabd" alt="" |
Fidel Castro |
Chilean President Michelle Bachelet |
Michelle has the merit of having been elected president of Chile by
the majority vote given to the Socialist Party that nominated her. It
was the first time in recent years in Latin America that a leftist
organization won such a victory, without any help from money, weapons or
the yanki publicity apparatus.
That credit is due even more to the Socialist Party of Salvador
Allende, who died during the treacherous direct air assault on La Moneda
(Palace) and who was fulfilling that duty as the
constitutionally-elected president of Chile. He did not ask for or
concede a truce. He had resolved to die in his post, as he had promised.
The betrayal of the sinister chief of the Chilean army, who was false
toward everyone and deceived everyone until the very last, was
unprecedented. Even the house where his (Allende’s) family lived, in
Tomps Moro, was attacked and destroyed.
During those very difficult times, when thousands were tortured,
assassinated or disappeared, a very young woman, Gladys Maron, was the
leader of Communist Party of Chile, forged over dozens of years of
efforts and sacrifices by the Chilean working class, which led her to
that responsibility.
Gladys Maron and her party were not wrong; they gave all their
support to Michelle Bachelet, thus determining the end of Augusto
Pinochet’s influence. It would have been impermissible for the dictator
created and placed in power by the empire to govern Chile’s destiny
again.
World opinion abhorred his behaviour.
Despite that, it has not been and still is not easy to undo the legal
intrigue that, with yanki help, the vengeful and fascist oligarchy uses
to tie down the Chilean nation, worthy of a better destiny.
More than 100 years ago in the war of 1879, those same oligarchs
robbed Bolivia of its maritime coast, which gave it extensive access to
the Pacific Ocean.
Bolivia suffered an extraordinary historic humiliation in that
conflict.
Not only did they take away its maritime coast and its outlet to the
sea, they also deprived that country - of authentically American origin,
above all Aymaras and Quechuas - of extensive lands very rich in copper,
which were the largest reserves in the world. After having been
exploited for 130 years, they produce as much as 5.364 billion tons
annually, contributing around $18.452 billion annually to the Chilean
economy. It is impossible to conceive of a modern society without
copper, which tends to rise in price.
Other extremely valuable minerals and natural products, some now
exhausted, and other new, extremely high-priced ones, have appeared. It
is not know which of them are Chilean and which are Bolivian.
Evo Morales, Bolivia’s current president, does not bear any grudges
about that; on the contrary, he offered his territory for a wide, modern
highway, over which the products of Chile’s efficient industry -which is
booming and developing, with its laborious and productive workers -
could be sent to many markets in the world.
Chile also is particularly efficient at producing nutritious foods
and high-quality lumber, on its farmland and mountains and with its
privileged climate.
There is no other country that surpasses it in the efficiency of its
aquaculture and high-demand products like salmon and other farmed or
natural species, in its rich maritime and terrestrial waters. Today we
are very close to February 15, the day of the referendum for a
constitutional amendment in the fraternal Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela. Jose Marto was Cuba’s most profound revolutionary thinker
ever and our national hero. In front of a granite likeness of that
thinker, Michelle Bachelet laid a wreath on behalf of her people, and we
are very grateful.
Regarding Bolovar, he (Marto) said 115 years ago, “What he left
undone remains so today, because Bolovar has much to do in America
still.”
“Bolivar awakens every 100 years,” the great Chilean poet Pablo
Neruda said, for his part.
On the verge of the closure of the second century of his rebellion
against Spanish colonialism, Bolovar is once again awakening in the
revolutionary actions of Chavez. If the new leader, who is leading his
combative people, does not achieve his objective, it will be hard for
any other leader to do so. It would not be possible to overcome the
media resources of the oligarchy and the empire.
What can be done, then, so that this planet refrains from becoming
like Dante’s inferno, where a sign at the entrance demanded leaving all
hope behind?
Nevertheless, I am still confident that in Venezuela, the Revolution
will be victorious, and that in Chile, the ideal of socialism for which
Salvador Allende fought and gave his life will finally triumph. These
were the issues I discussed with Michelle Bachelet, who did me the
honour of listening with interest, conversing warmly and extensively
expressing her ideas.
I will always be satisfied with her friendly visit.
CubaDebate
|