
New info in the fight against flu:
The changing form of influenza virus, a challenge
Influenza virus can rapidly evolve from one form to another,
complicating the effectiveness of vaccines and anti-viral drugs used to
treat it. By first understanding the complex host cell pathways that the
flu uses for replication, researchers are finding new strategies for
therapies and vaccines, according to a study. The researchers studied
RNA interference to determine the host genes influenza uses for virus
replication.
All viruses act as parasites by latching onto healthy cells and
hijacking the cells' components, essentially turning the cell into a
factory that produces copies of the virus. This process begins when
influenza binds to sugars found on the surface of host cells in the lung
and respiratory tract.
Nucleus
Once attached, the virus downloads its genetic information into the
nucleus of the cell, and virus replication begins. "Viruses contain very
minimal genetic information and have evolved to parasitise host cell
machinery to package and replicate virus cells. Because virus
replication is dependent on host cell components, determining the genes
needed for this process allows for the development of novel disease
intervention strategies that include anti-virals and vaccines," said
study co-author Ralph Tripp, a Georgia Research Alliance Eminent
Scholar.
"We have the technology today that allows us to target specific genes
in human cells and silence those genes to inhibit the production of
virus in the cells," he said.
Pathways
RNA interference, which was first discovered as the mechanism that
effects colour change in petunia breeding, is now being applied to
medical advancements. Using RNAi silencing technologies, Tripp's lab was
able to identify key host cell pathways needed by influenza virus for
replication. "We have a very limited toolbox for treating influenza,"
Tripp said. "There are two medications currently used to treat flu
infections, but virus resistance has developed to these drugs.
Our studies have identified several novel host genes and associated
cell pathways that can be targeted with existing drugs to silence virus
replication." Understanding which genes can be silenced to inhibit
growth of viruses opens the medicine cabinet for the repurposing of
existing drugs.
Existing anti-viral drugs slow influenza virus replication by
preventing the virus from releasing itself from its host cell. These
treatments target the virus, which is able to rapidly mutate to avoid
drug sensitivity.
In contrast, drugs that target host genes work more effectively
because host genes rarely change or mutate. "If we target a host gene,
the virus can't adapt," Tripp said.
The influenza virus "may look for other host genes in the same
pathway to use, which may be many, but we have identified the majority
of preferred genes and can target these genes for silencing."
The influenza A virus has eight single RNA strands that code for 11
proteins. Recent studies suggest it may need several dozen host genes to
reproduce.
Turning off the apex, or signalling, gene can cause the reproduction
sequence to stall.
"Through this research we can repurpose previously approved drugs and
apply those to influenza treatments, drastically reducing the time from
the laboratory to human medicine," said Victoria Meliopoulos, a UGA
graduate student and co-author of the study.
Meliopoulos said these discoveries can be used to create new
anti-viral drugs and develop better vaccines that can be used to treat
patients with influenza.
Influenza is the world's leading cause of morbidity and mortality;
seasonal viruses affect up to 15 percent of the human population and
cause severe illness in 5 million people a year, according to the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
MNT
Protein plays a key role in storing long-term memories
Memories in our brains are maintained by connections between neurons
called "synapses". But how do these synapses stay strong and keep
memories alive for decades? Neuroscientists at the Stowers Institute for
Medical Research have discovered a major clue from a study in fruit
flies: Hardy, self-copying clusters or oligomers of a synapse protein
are an essential ingredient for the formation of long-term memory.
Memory
The finding supports a surprising new theory about memory, and may
have a profound impact on explaining other oligomer-linked functions and
diseases in the brain, including Alzheimer's disease.
"Self-sustaining populations of oligomers at synapses may be the key
to the long-term synaptic changes that underlie memory; in fact, our
finding hints that oligomers play a wider role in the brain than has
been thought," said Kausik Si, an associate investigator at the Stowers
Institute, and senior author of the new study.
Si's investigations in this area began nearly a decade ago during his
doctoral research in the Columbia University laboratory of Nobel-winning
neuroscientist Eric Kandel. He found that in the sea slug Aplysia
californica, which has long been favoured by neuroscientists for memory
experiments because of its large, easily-studied neurons, a
synapse-maintenance protein known as CPEB (Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation
Element Binding protein) has an unexpected property.
A portion of the structure is self-complementary and - much like
empty egg cartons - can easily stack up with other copies of itself.
CPEB thus exists in neurons partly in the form of oligomers, which
increase in number when neuronal synapses strengthen.
Resistance
These oligomers have a hardy resistance to ordinary solvents, and
within neurons may be much more stable than single-copy "monomers" of
CPEB. They also seem to actively sustain their population by serving as
templates for the formation of new oligomers from free monomers in the
vicinity.
In the new study, Si and his colleagues examined a Drosophila fruit
fly CPEB protein known as Orb2. Like its counterpart in Aplysia, it
forms oligomers within neurons.
Oligomers
"We found that these Orb2 oligomers become more numerous in neurons
whose synapses are stimulated, and that this increase in oligomers
happens near synapses," said lead author Amitabha Majumdar, a post
doctoral researcher in Si's lab.
The key was to show that the disruption of Orb2 oligomerisation on
its own impairs Orb2's function in stabilising memory. Majumdar was able
to do this by generating an Orb2 mutant that lacks the normal ability to
oligomerise yet maintains a near-normal concentration in neurons.
Fruit flies carrying this mutant form of Orb2 lost their ability to
form long-term memories.
"For the first 24 hours after a memory-forming stimulus, the memory
was there, but by 48 hours it was gone, whereas in flies with normal
Orb2 the memory persisted," Majumdar said.
Si and his team are now following up with experiments to determine
for how long Orb2 oligomers are needed to keep a memory alive.
Neuroscience
"We suspect that they need to be continuously present, because they
are self-sustaining in a way that Orb2 monomers are not," says Si.
The team's research also suggests some intriguing possibilities for
other areas of neuroscience.
This study revealed that Orb2 proteins in the Drosophila nervous
system come in a rare, highly oligomerisation-prone form (Orb2A) and a
much more common, much less oligomerisation-prone form (Orb2B).
"The rare form seems to be the one that is regulated, and it seems to
act like a seed for the initial oligomerisation, which pulls in copies
of the more abundant form," Si said.
"This may turn out to be a basic pattern for functional oligomers."
The findings may help scientists understand disease-causing oligomers
too.
Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Huntington's disease, all involve the
spread in the brain of apparently toxic oligomers of various proteins.
One such protein, strongly implicated in Alzheimer's disease, is
amyloid beta; like Orb2 it comes in two forms, the highly oligomerizing
amyloid-beta-42 and the relatively inert amyloid-beta-40.
- sciencedaily.com
All itches are not equal
New research from a world-renowned itch expert Gil Yosipovitch, shows
that how good scratching an itch feels is related to the itch's
location.
While previous studies by Yosipovitch have shown the pleasurability
of itching, analysis of itch relief at different body sites and related
pleasurability had not been performed until now.
"The goal of this study was to examine the role of the pleasurability
of scratching in providing relief for itch," Yosipovitch said.
"We first evaluated whether itch intensity was perceived differently
at three body sites, and then we investigated the potential correlation
between the pleasurability and the itch relief induced by scratching."
Legume
Yosipovitch and colleagues induced itch on the ankles, forearms and
backs of 18 study participants with cowhage spicules, which come from a
type of legume found in tropical areas that are known to cause intense
itching.
The spicules were rubbed gently in a circular motion for 45 seconds
within a small area of the skin and removed with adhesive tape once itch
was induced. Itch intensity and scratching pleasurability were assessed
every 30 seconds for a duration of five minutes using a Visual Analog
Scale (VAS) to rate intensity - 0 for no itch, up to 10 for maximum
unbearable itch. Their results show that itch was perceived most
intensely at the ankle and back, while the perception of itch and
scratching relief were less pronounced on the forearm.
Another major finding of the paper, as Yosipovitch explains, is that
"the pleasurability of scratching the ankle appears to be longer lived
compared to the other two sites."
Disease
Yosipovitch said this research helps lead to a better understanding
of itch and how to relieve it for people who have skin disease.
"We see commonly involved areas such as the ankle and back in itchy
patients with skin disorders caused by eczema or psoriasis," he said.
"We never understood why those areas were more affected, and now we
better understand that itch in these areas is more intense and
pleasurable to scratch."
Yosipovitch said that while it is known that small nerve fibres are
involved in unpleasant sensations such as itch and pain, he and other
researchers now suspect that there are also specific nerve fibres
involved in pleasure.
- swellingrelief.com
How cholera bacterium gains a foothold in the gut
A team of biologists at the University of York has made an important
advance in our understanding of the way cholera attacks the body.
The discovery could help scientists target treatments for the
globally significant intestinal disease which kills more than 100,000
people every year.
The disease is caused by the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which is able
to colonise the intestine usually after consumption of contaminated
water or food. Once infection is established, the bacterium secretes a
toxin that causes watery diarrhoea and ultimately death if not treated
rapidly. Colonisation of the intestine is difficult for incoming
bacteria as they have to be highly competitive to gain a foothold among
the trillions of other bacteria already in situ. Scientists at York, led
by Dr Gavin Thomas have investigated one of the important routes that V.
cholera uses to gain this foothold.
To be able to grow in the intestine the bacterium harvests and then
eats a sugar, called sialic acid, that is present on the surface of our
gut cells.
Collaborators of the York group at the University of Delaware, USA,
led by Professor Fidelma Boyd, had shown previously that eating sialic
acid was important for the survival of V. cholerae in animal models, but
the mechanism by which the bacteria recognise and take up the sialic was
unknown.
The York research, funded by the Biotechnology and Biological
Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), demonstrates that the pathogen uses a
particular kind of transporter called a TRAP transporter to recognise
sialic acid and take it up into the cell.
The transporter has particular properties that are suited to
scavenging the small amount of available sialic acid.
The research also provided some important basic information about how
TRAP transporters work in general.
The leader of the research in York, Dr Gavin Thomas, said: "This work
continues our discoveries of how bacteria that grow in our body exploit
sialic acid for their survival and help us to take forward our efforts
to design chemicals to inhibit these processes in different bacterial
pathogens."
- MNT
Psychologists analyse development of prejudices in children
Girls are not as good at playing football as boys, and they do not
have a clue about cars. Instead they know better how to dance and do not
get into mischief as often as boys. Prejudices like these are cultivated
from early childhood by everyone.
"Approximately at the age of three to four years children start to
prefer children of the same sex, and later the same ethnic group or
nationality," Prof. Dr. Andreas Beelmann of the Friedrich Schiller
University Jena (Germany) states. This is part of an entirely normal
personality development, the director of the Institute for Psychology
explains.
"It only gets problematic when the more positive evaluation of the
own social group, which is adopted automatically in the course of
identity formation, at some point reverts into bias and discrimination
against others," Beelmann continues.
To prevent this, the Jena psychologist and his team have been working
on a prevention program for children.
It is designed to reduce prejudice and encourage tolerance for
others. But when is the right time to start? Jena psychologists Dr.
Tobias Raabe and Prof. Dr. Andreas Beelmann systematically summarise
scientific studies on that topic and published the results of their
research in the science journal Child Development.
According to this, the development of prejudice increases steadily at
pre-school age and reaches its highest level between five and seven
years of age. With increasing age this development is reversed and the
prejudices decline. "This reflects normal cognitive development of
children," Prof. Beelmann explains. "At first they adopt the social
categories from their social environment, mainly the parents.
Then they start to build their own social identity according to
social groups, before they finally learn to differentiate and individual
evaluations of others will prevail over stereotypes." Therefore, the
psychologists reckon this age is the ideal time to start well-designed
prevention programs against prejudice. "Prevention starting at that age
supports the normal course of development," Beelmann says.
As the new study and the experience of the Jena psychologists with
their prevention program so far show, the prejudices are strongly
diminished at primary school age, when children get in touch with
members of so-called social out groups like, for instance children of a
different nationality or skin colour. "This also works when they don't
even get in touch with real people but learn it instead via books or
told stories."
But at the same time the primary school age is a critical time for
prejudices to consolidate.
"If there is no or only a few contact to members of social out
groups, there is no personal experience to be made and generalising
negative evaluations stick longer."
In this, scientists see an explanation for the particularly strong
xenophobia in regions with a very low percentage of foreigners or
migrants.
- medicalxpress.com
|