An oracle of modernism in ancient Rome
The opening of the Ara Pacis Museum should have been cause for
celebration. The first major civic building completed in the historic
center of Rome in more than a half-century, it trumpets this city's
willingness to embrace contemporary architecture after decades of smugly
turning its back on the present.
That the building is a flop is therefore a major disappointment.
Designed by Richard Meier for a site at the edge of a Fascist-era piazza
overlooking the Tiber River, the museum boasts a muscular main hall
built to house the Ara Pacis, an altar erected as a symbol of Roman
peace - that is, military conquest - from around 9 B.C. The building's
glistening glass and travertine shell has all of Mr. Meier's usual
flourishes, from the expansive use of glass to obsessive grids.
But in its relationship to the glories of the city around it, the
building is as clueless as its Fascist predecessors. The piazza,
designed in the 1930's, was a blunt propaganda tool intended to invest
the Fascist state with the grandeur of imperial Rome; Mr. Meier's
building is a contemporary expression of what can happen when an
architect fetishizes his own style out of a sense of
self-aggrandizement.
Absurdly overscale, it seems indifferent to the naked beauty of the
dense and richly textured city around it.
Self-importance
That kind of insensitivity tends to reinforce the clich, that all
contemporary architecture is an expression of an architect's
self-importance. The building is bound to give ammunition to
architectural conservatives who clamor that there is no room for bold
new architecture in the eternal city.
But if you're going to fiddle with ancient Rome, there are few better
places to start than this site, the Piazza Augusto Imperatore. Designed
by Vittorio Ballio Morpurgo, it is a prime example of how the Fascists
used architecture to reshape and distort history.
The Ara Pacis was excavated from its original site and carted in
pieces a short distance to its present location in the 1930's.
Mussolini reinstalled the altar in a new glass-and-stone building by
Morpurgo next to the ancient tomb of the Emperor Augustus (63 B.C. to
A.D. 14), implying the dictator's supposed bond with ancient
emperor-conquerors. The symbolic link between a modern Fascist state and
a heroic classical past was fortified by the flanking buildings, with
their abstracted facades and shadowy arcades.
Like other Fascist-era planners working in the city's historic heart,
Morpurgo callously razed the decrepit old neighbourhoods that once
surrounded the ancient mausoleum, as if to liberate the city's repressed
imperial history. But he ignored the essence of the city's beauty, the
wondrous way you suddenly press up against the facade of an unfamiliar
church, for example, or enter an airy piazza that appears out of
nowhere.
Although Mr. Meier speaks eloquently about the architectural past,
his buildings can be stubbornly oblivious to physical and cultural
context. In Barcelona, Spain, the enormous glass facade of his Museum of
Contemporary Art inexplicably exposes the interior to the blazing sun.
His Getty Center turns its back on the car culture of Los Angeles in
favor of the themed fantasy of an Italian hill town.
The Ara Pacis Museum rises between a roadway that runs along the
Tiber and the enormous weed-encrusted drum of the ancient mausoleum of
Augustus several yards below. Anchored by the main entrance at one end
and an auditorium at the other, the museum's main hall is sheathed in
glass on both sides so that motorists can catch glimpses of the Ara
Pacis and the mausoleum just beyond it as they speed along the river.
A pleasant marble stairway near the main entrance leads up from the
piazza to the river embankment.
Shallow steps
The building's best features reside in the interior, along the
carefully calibrated approach to the tomblike altar. Just inside the
entry, for example, a long, low window extends along the base of the
wall to remind you briefly of the world outside. From here a few shallow
steps lead up to the altar, which is bathed in natural light.
Mr. Meier has also responded deftly to the Roman altar, supplying a
structure that stands up to the sculpture's weight and stark power. The
main hall is supported by four heavy white columns that rise to meet a
grid of deep beams.
The contrast between the rough finish of Mr. Meier's travertine and
the ornate stonework works just fine. There are other nice details. At
the back of the hall a stair drops down behind a towering travertine
wall to the theater lobby, which acts as a hinge separating the room
housing the celebrated altar from the bustle.
Above the theater an outdoor terrace juts out slightly to afford a
view up toward the Piazza del Popolo. Yet in Rome context is
inescapable, and Mr. Meier's building seems intent on shunning the
city's seductive charms.
Like most new museums, the Ara Pacis is stuffed with unnecessary
add-ons: an overly formal lobby, a bookstore and a 150-seat theater that
seems a wrongheaded fillip in a museum with a single work of art. The
museum's bloated size was not entirely Mr. Meier's fault; the government
client had something to do with it. But he compounds the problem by
playing to the piazza's monumentality rather than countering it with the
quietness that its pomposity demands.
The thick slab of a roof only adds to the composition's oppressive
weight.
Still worse is Mr. Meier's treatment of two churches, San Rocco and
San Girolamo dei Croati, at one end of the piazza. To root his building
in the city's ancient fabric, he created a long travertine wall that
extends from the museum's main entrance to the roadway beside the river.
Viewed from the road, the wall chops the churches off at half height,
so that you don't feel the full effect of their coming into view as
unexpected treasures. And Mr.Meier's project overwhelms the piazza
below, pressing in on it disrespectfully so that the church facades
almost seem to recoil in embarrassment.
In the end his building may be as telling about the sins of our era
as Morpurgo's design was of his. While Mussolini's architects can be
faulted for trying to reshape the city's history for their own
propaganda aims - and to satisfy the egomanical drive of a despot - the
museum reminds us that vanity is not unique to generals or politicians.
It may be another half-century before Romans go down this road again.
(New York Times)
|