Is this the port mentioned in the Old Testament?:
What will you find if you drain the Galle harbour?
by Aditha Dissanayake
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f9cd/0f9cd229c73bc37650db62b95c34f6fb78317086" alt=""
Courtesy www.imagesofceylon.com
|
It's that time of the year once more for the Marine Archaeologists in
Galle to start dwelling deep into the Indian ocean to discover the
mysteries of the shipwrecks lying on the ocean bed of the Galle Harbour
(from perhaps the days of Ibn Battuta!). How did they sink? Were there
casualties? Did they go down as fast and as dramatically as the Titanic?
"Come, dive with us to the depths of the harbour and you will find
out the answers" It's hard to imagine Marine Archaeologist, Rasika
Muthukumarana, making such an invitation. After the recent attacks of
the LTTE, security has been strengthened in the Galle Harbour and the
last thing he would want on his hands is an amateur diver - especially
one with an overblown imagination.
"Even though security has been intensified we have started our
excavations" says S. M. Nandadasa, Officer-in-charge, Maritime
Archaeology Unit (MAU), Galle.
Chosen as a port for its excellent strategic position - (the next
piece of land, literally is the frozen waste of the Antarctic, over five
thousand miles away), what treasures lie beneath the blue waters of this
natural harbour, claimed by James Tennant as the port mentioned in the
Old Testament?
How many ships have reached the sandy depths of the ocean floor
across the passage of time?
According to Muthukumarana ten sites have already been identified
within the Galle harbour, some dating as far back as the 14th century,
with several stone anchors weighing almost a ton and probably made in
Arabia. Another anchor found among the wrecks is said to be similar to
those used in Roman times.
Yet, the most interesting of them all is the one described as the
Chicken's Foot Wreck which later turned out to be a Dutch ship called
the "Avondster". With an eye witness' account reporting there were no
casualties, mystery shrouds the skull found inside the wreck. Who was
this young man in his early thirties who went down with the ship? Was he
trapped inside one of the cabins? Was he a stowaway? A slave?
Lost again
The answers might have already been discovered had not the tsunami
intervened. "Our lab, a single storied building on a jetty in the old
section of the port was too close to the sea to have survived the
tsunami" recalls Muthukumarana. "A decade of hard work was washed away".
Among them were priceless spoons, jars, jugs and even leather belts,
ill-fated and never destined to be on land, for they were swallowed by
the waves again, to settle once more on the ocean floor. All was not
lost though. "We did find several cupboards which were swept inland,
packed with some of the artifacts.
And the skull of the mysterious young man on the Avondster? Lost and
then found, buried among the rubble of what was once the MAU building.
But these artifacts amount to about 30% of the treasures - thousands of
centuries old - which were excavated within the past nine years. "We had
to begin from zero.
But three months after the tsunami we started diving again. The Dutch
government helped us with the money and the equipment. Now our lab is
inside the Fort, and hopefully, away from the next tsunami" says
Muthukumarana, wistfully.
Two "sites"
With the Avondster project completed, work continues on two other
projects. Preferring to call them "sites" and not shipwrecks
Muthukumarana says he finds underwater excavations far more thrilling
than digging for artifacts on land. "Safety comes first" he explains.
"Even though there are poison plants the harbour is safe from dangerous
fish like sharks".
Safe for divers, yes, but how safe for the ships that used to sail
into the harbour from as far away as China, during the time of the Song
Dynasty? Protected from the northeast monsoon but exposed to the
southwest, the entrance to the harbour is said to be dangerous because
of the many submerged rocks and reefs.
Yet among the Asian ports of the United Dutch East India Company,
Galle was second only to Jakarta (then called Batavia) Of the six VOC
ships found on the ocean bed, three were wrecked while entering or
leaving the harbour, two within the harbour and one outside the bay
while waiting for the pilot to bring her in.
At the moment, in spite of the high drama which took place barely a
month ago, the waters of the harbour, reflecting the murky grey sky is
quiet and looks forbidding to the amateur diver. But for the
professional marine archaeologists it's time to don the oxygen masks,
the diving paraphernalia and splash boldly into a world which no
ordinary mortal ever gets to see.
What they will come up with, this time round, is anybody's guess.
***
History
Perhaps the earliest recorded reference to Galle comes from the great
Arab traveller Ibn Battuta, who visited the port which he calls Qali, in
the mid 14th century. The Portuguese first arrived in 1505, when a fleet
commanded by Lorenzo de Almeida took shelter from a storm in the lee of
the town.
Clearly the strategic significance of the harbour impressed the
Portuguese, for 82 years later, in 1587, they seized control of the town
from the Sinhala kings and began the construction of the Galle Fort.
This even marked the beginning of almost four centuries of European
domination of the city, resulting in the fascinating hybrid -
architecturally, culturally and ethnically - which Galle is today.
Maritime Archaeology Unit
Instigated by the Department of Archaeology, the Maritime Archaeology
Unit comes under the Central Cultural Fund. The present Director of the
MAU is Dr. Mohan Abeyratne.
[email protected] |