Scientist plans to crack genetic secrets
It is hard to think of a more audacious scientific endeavour - to
catalogue the genetic diversity of the most abundant living group in the
largest habitat on Earth. At the same time, the project will compile a
huge genetic library that will teach scientists how living things are
put together and help them to harness novel genes for creating new drugs
or pollution-free energy.
The driving force behind this, self-styled maverick scientist Craig
Venter, is no stranger to audacity. He was vilified by the scientific
establishment for taking them on in the race to sequence the human
genome. Since an uneasy draw in the genome contest was brokered in 2000
between public and private sequencing efforts, he has been in no mood to
rest on his laurels.
His latest project is the Global Ocean Sampling Expedition, carried
out by a team of scientists aboard his research yacht Sorcerer II. The
aim is to sequence the DNA of micro-organisms in water samples collected
at intervals during a circumnavigation of the globe.
This is the modern equivalent of Victorian explorers reaching the
interior of the African continent and returning with countless bizarre
beasts never encountered by western science. Less than 1% of the
planet's microbes can be grown in the lab and only a fraction of them
have been studied in any detail. The other 99% are virtually unknown.
Even though many of these are fragments, the haul nearly doubles the
number of all known proteins that have been gleaned from sequence data
by science before - and so far, the team has only published information
from a quarter of its samples.
The results, which appear in three papers in the online open access
journal the Public Library of Science: Biology, use data from 44 sites
down the north-east coast of the US, through the Caribbean and Panama
canal, and out to the Galapagos islands in the Pacific.
"Instead of being at the end of discovery it means we are at the
early stages," said Dr Venter. "We have a long way to go to understand
life here."
Dr Venter points out that ocean microbes are perhaps our biggest hope
of slowing down or stopping global warming, because the oceans store
masses of carbon. "They are largely responsible for the atmosphere we
have to breathe," he said. Perhaps the oceans could be seeded with
tailor-made communities of micro-organisms that speed up carbon dioxide
uptake.
"In the longer run, there will be effects on our understanding of a
huge array of genes, based on their sequences, with implications for
protein engineering," said Gerard Manning, part of Dr Venter's team at
the Salk Institute in California.
By seeing the many ways in which a protein can be put together,
scientists should have a better idea of how to design new proteins from
scratch.
The huge catalogue of new off-the-shelf genes will also be extremely
useful. "Truly novel proteins provide a treasure trove that may some day
cure cancer, provide ways to produce chemical energy efficiently, or who
knows," said team member Douglas Rusch.
Many proteins from micro-organisms are already used in industrial
processes, but having different versions which perhaps work at different
temperatures or levels of acidity would allow companies to fine-tune
these processes or make them less energy-hungry. It will all be useful
genetic fodder for another of Dr Venter's pet projects, an attempt to
build a synthetic organism from scratch.
Dr Venter's bull-in-a-china-shop entry into human genome sequencing
earned him the epithet "bad boy of science" from Time magazine in 2000.
Many of his colleagues in the scientific community who condemned his
plans to make money from information gleaned from the human genetic code
were less polite.
The former high-school dropout's latest scientific endeavour does not
attract the same vitriol from rivals. He recalls an incident at
university in which a professor told him that biology had been pretty
much wrapped up.
Guardian
|