Rural talent -:
The untapped opportunities
by Lionel WIJESIRI
The rural inhabitants in Sri Lanka consist of about 78% of the total
population. Even though they contribute to a considerable portion of the
Gross Domestic Product, most of them live in disadvantaged
socio-economic conditions. If we look at the present situation
rationally, we see that the manpower crunch in the rural sector in Sri
Lanka is more serious than we think. The rural unemployment has become
an acute problem. One reason is because formal job growth in the rural
areas hasn't kept up with economic growth. And the other is the mismatch
in skills between those demanded by employers and those acquired in
rural schools.
We have seen how urban Sri Lanka has witnessed growth in jobs in the
past few decades. However, surveys also indicate that many of our rural
children still drop out from school in the primary session itself and
they are forced to take up menial jobs instead of completing their
schooling.
Providing jobs for unemployed rural youths has become a Herculean
task for the policy makers of the country.
Hidden talent
It is also said that the true judge of a country's economic
development is when it makes an impact on people at the grass rootslevel.
So it is for the benefit of the whole country that we put a stop to this
"demographic disaster" without any further delay.
It is in this context that entrepreneurs should tie up with
educational institutes and even working in collaboration with local
governments, to identify the hidden talent amongst rural youth.
Any experienced entrepreneur would agree without any reservation that
our rural workforce is not second, in any way, to the urban candidates.
If anything is missing, it is only the lack of awareness and opportunity
to get to the top, and also their inability to make use of the available
options. They might need a bit of polishing when it comes to language,
communication skills, and etiquettes. In short, while they have a clear
understanding of the work and are adept at process knowledge, only the
softer aspects need to be made familiar with.
In an attempt to prove themselves to make it big coming from the
smaller towns, they have a zeal, passion and determination to prove
themselves against all odds. From here stems the fact that they are more
dedicated and loyal to the work and the institute they work, because
they are have an additional responsibility and a point to prove in the
social circle.
With the cost factor in the big cities going up, corporate sector
should feel the need to look at different directions and go the rural
way, so that it gives them an opening to cut down on costs and
comparatively also a long-term employee commitment.
Giving opportunities to the rural talent uplifts individuals from
their status level, empowers them and paves the way for socio-economic
development. It aids the private sector to bridge the gap between the
urban-rural divide, and also to act as a part of their corporate social
responsibility program.
Rural talent should have good access to job opportunities. Presently,
such access is not as easily available to them.
Therefore, a concerted effort to target the smaller towns with
relevant education institutes will help to bridge the resource crunch
faced by the industry. For an industry as a whole, initiations by
companies into tapping the rural talent pool will help galvanize a
movement that will bring to the fore the entire hidden workforce.
Organizations will have a larger pool of people to work with, and can
leverage from the best of the lot.
For dialogue between the three stakeholders, government, corporate
sector and the poor, a facilitating mechanism is required. We can make a
small beginning by setting up a pro-active Rural Manpower Development
Authority dedicated to this work. It can identify, train and link rural
youth to entry level jobs in the organized sector. The success of such
an Authority can succeed only if it is incorporated as an institution to
create an enabling eco-sphere for public-private partnerships. The
institutional framework of having senior government officers and private
sector on the Executive Committee allows the best of the private sector
linkages to be wedded to a powerful muscle and machinery .With this
collaboration the seemingly impossible can become truly possible.
Suggestions
Having a private sector composition in the core team allows for
development of grass roots products, tailor made for the rural poor. I
would also like to suggest the setting up of two more products - the
Rural Business Academy and the Rural English and Computer Academy. So
doors will be opened; skills required for different entry level
positions can be taught in the village itself in collaboration with
companies.
What will be the final result? At least, three benefits would
surface.
The rural work- ready get fitted into positions beyond their
imagination.The programme will enable the corporate sector to get a
ready-made pool of workers from a large rural labour pool who are
motivated and eager to excel. For the family of the poor, a shift takes
place from erratic incomes, due to a dependence on rain fed agriculture,
to a steady money source month after month.
Jobs
Recently I heard an inspiring story. A manager at a national company
was amazed to hear an office peon who came from a rural area, tell him
it was his last day as he had learnt some computer programs in his spare
time and was now switching careers. The company official led the peon to
their own computer skill testing centre for placement. He got as a job
as a trainee.
This is not an isolate incident. Interestingly, aspiration levels
zoom even in the seemingly low entry level jobs in which these rural
young people are placed. And one organized sector job in a family, takes
away the stigma and smell of poverty in a sustained manner. Rural youth
in jobs relate incidents of their well-to-do relatives and those who
once ignored them suddenly find reasons to connect up!
The concept of the public-private partnerships in this sector of
imparting market linked skills to rural youth is still in its infancy.
By not forging these linkages, business may lose opportunity; government
may loose credibility; but society loses most of all by not creating
millions of skilled youths. |