Changing teaching methodology in classical dance
by Subashini PATHMANATHAN
Indian classical dances are considered as divine dance forms. Earlier
classical dance teachers firmly, adhered to the styles and to the
standards.
Most of the classical dance forms were adopted by the Gurukula
traditions.
Gurukulam means - where the ‘Shishas’ (students) stayed with the
traditional ‘Gurus’ and served them learned and absorbed the art forms.
These traditional heredity Gurus took the dance classes without any time
limit. They not only taught the art forms, but also gave full confidence
to their students, and taught the nuances of the dances and encouraged
them along with the dance training.
They were also trained in the classical music. The students learned
the art with full dedication, devotion, and involvement. During that
period it was considered as a full time profession.
Earlier the traditional Gurus taught the art according to the
students’ talents, ability, age, and different skills. The students in
Gurukula System learnt the art under one and the same teacher, for years
together. It cherished the individual, independent, creativity, and
perfection of the students in their particular dance forms. With the
passage of time, this art form has moved to institutions. Then the
institutions, the teaching methodology took a different dimension.
In the institutions the students have both advantages and
disadvantages. They learn the art in a systematic manner doing both
theory and practice. In addition they were taught vocal and instrumental
music. Yet many of the institutions unfortunately impart theory, which
is not very relevant to the practical side of the dancing career.
At one institution a student is supposed to learn the dancing, under
different teachers at different stages at different years which affect
the model idea about the dance forms. The student is supposed to learn
the different aspects of dance under different teachers. Besides these,
the course is confined to a particular time limit, and a prescribed
syllabus. Moreover, dance teachers try to impose their own rigid,
vigorous, creativity ideas, which blunt the creativity of the student
community.
Most of the students today learn the dance as a part time activity.
Generally they attend classes twice a week, or once a week. Even
these classes are restricted to one or two hours a week.
In Sri Lanka classical dance form is introduced as a subject at
school level. Most of the students take dance just as a normal subject
to gain a credit pass or to got a distinction at the GCE examination,
without considering the aesthetic value of the art form. Teachers also
teach the subject as a routine without taking much efforts.
Earlier the dance teachers were good vocalists, and they had a very
good knowledge in the classical music. The knowledge of classical music
is very much needed for a dance teacher. Today the knowledge of
classical music is very much lacking among the dance teachers. Most of
the teachers are using the tape music or CD players for the practices,
as well as for the recitals.
Like other educational faculties distance education programme has
also penetrated in the teaching technology in the dance field. Today you
can earn a degree, or diploma in the classical dance forms. Instead of
performing the dance, the present generation of students is always keen
on earning a degree or diploma. Their aim is to get an employment.
The students who are following the distance education in dance are
learning through the printed theory materials, as well as through CD
demonstrations. It is not a healthy method for learning dance because
performing art should be learnt under the guidance of a Guru.
|