For efficient co-ordination:
Diplomatic service to be strengthened - Neomal Perera
By P. Krishnaswamy

Deputy External Affairs Minister Neomal Perera |
Deputy External Affairs Minister Neomal Perera told the Sunday
Observer in an interview that his Ministry is working round-the-clock in
coordinating with the President's office, the Defence Ministry and other
relevant ministries to keep our foreign missions informed of decisions
taken in Colombo and to prove them with guidelines on how they should
react to specific situations. The country already has very competent
people in the foreign service but, as is the practice in any
institution, the possibility of absorbing more accomplished career
diplomats into the service is also under consideration, he said.
Being a former Deputy Minister of Fisheries, he also expressed his
views on permanently resolving the cross-border issue of fishermen
across the Palk Strait.
Excerpts of the interview:
Q: Are there moves underway in your Ministry to strengthen the
foreign service with more talented and competent career diplomats in the
wake of the current situation?
A: There is no question of lack of competence. The present situation
calls for much more than competence. We are planning to improve
coordinated efforts with the President's office, the Defence Ministry
and other relevant ministries on deciding what our ambassadors should do
and what they should say on specific occasions to counter any efforts to
tarnish the image of the country. Accordingly we provide them the
guidelines. The people in the foreign service are competent enough. But,
however, we are trying to get better people into the service as any
institution would do to improve its efficiency.
The country has emerged from a three-decade-long civil war after
eliminating the most ruthless terrorist outfit. We are trying to
introduce new systems in the light of the present day requirements. We
are now working round-the-clock providing all necessary information to
our foreign missions on the position of the President, the relevant
ministries and security authorities on specific matters.
Q: The UN has now requested us to set up our own investigation into
the purported war crimes and HR violations?
A: We set up the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC)
over one year and six months ago. The LLRC has been in the process of
holding inquiries, investigations and recording statements of all
interested and affected persons. The right approach for any institution,
may it be international or local, is to intimate the LLRC of the
complaints they have received so that the LLRC can act in an appropriate
manner to ascertain the veracity of it and take suitable action. Those
institutions should not take upon themselves the responsibility of
conducting their own inquiries or investigations. They do not have the
right to do so. Ours is a democratically-elected government, we have a
competent judiciary and we can, on our own, ascertain the veracity of
any complaints relating to our internal affairs. The LLRC has recorded
evidence and statements from very prominent persons, including those who
held high Government positions, those affected and those living abroad.
Q: Would you rule out influence of sections of the Tamil diaspora,
who provided support and all assistance to the LTTE, in relation to the
report of the UN Panel?
A: All comforts and influence which the particular groups of diaspora
are enjoying overseas is at the expense and exploitation of the innocent
Tamils of those countries. Many of them were smuggled into those
countries by these diaspora groups for their own ends. They were able to
enjoy all comforts, collect funds, procure weapons for the LTTE and
extend other forms of support by the making migrant Tamils to work in
sub-human conditions in unknown and far-away lands. Their ulterior
motive is money and power. They exploit people of all communities
irrespective of whether they are Sinhalese, Tamils or Muslims but
outwardly say that they are championing the rights of the Tamils. So I
would not rule out such possibilities.
Q: Some of the Western media also levelled various unfounded
accusations on the Sri Lankan Government and the Armed Forces?
A: It is the normal function of the media to give publicity to any
significant or sensational news or occurrences. It is up to us to
ascertain whether they are true or deliberately fabricated to tarnish
our image.
Again, the LLRC is engaged in this process. Many persons who gave
evidence before the LLRC had accused the Government forces. It is upto
the LLRC to decide on the veracity of such accusations. So the LLRC is
the right authority to which such matters should be referred. If it is
not referred to the LLRC but only seeks to get publicity, then we can
assume that there is a mischievous motive. There is a justice system
effectively in force in this country and even a convicted criminal has
the right to appeal. So nothing is conclusive unless it is referred to
the appropriate authorities for proper verification.
Q: We have been dealing with the most ruthless terrorist outfit in
the world whose cadres mostly disguised as civilians and were capable of
blowing themselves up to cause mayhem. Are the international
organisations that are pointing an accusing finger at the Government
aware of the true nature of the LTTE?
A: The international organisations measure the so-called freedom
movements, many of which were found to be terrorist organisations, with
a different yardstick than the democratically-elected Governments.
The UN Convention has a clause specifying the quantum of explosives
and landmines that a' freedom movement' can use in its struggle against
its undemocratic country. During the final stages of the war, and during
the humanitarian operations launched by our forces on May 19, 2009, the
LTTE used civilians as human shields. When the Security Forces made
loud-speaker announcements telling the civilians to go away isolating
the LTTE and they responded the LTTE slaughtered them point blank. The
number of casualties in such attacks was very high. The forces were
caught between the LTTE and the civilians. Had it not been for the
timely humanitarian operation launched by the forces, the armed conflict
would have continued for more years posing a security threat in the
whole region. They were involved in the smuggling of humans, arms and
drugs. Everything stopped abruptly after their defeat.
Q: Observers of international affairs have commented that the UN
interest in safeguarding HR is not genuine?
A: Our country is also in the UN membership and the general
understanding and principle is the safeguard of HR all over the world.
As regards the report of the UN Panel, this is a matter that should have
been entrusted to the LLRC for inquiries and investigations into,
instead of being given publicity for publicity sake.
We are willing to investigate on any evidence that they may have but
through the LLRC .
Q: Will the countries in the membership of the Non-Aligned Movement
(NAM) give us a moral support?
A: Many of the NAM countries are also in the membership of the UN.
They can support a just cause.
Q: The Indian small vehicles find a very good market in Sri Lanka
while the signing of the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA)
remains in abeyance. Your comments please?
A: India is a very good partner to do business with. When it comes to
investments we promote Sri Lanka. Under the CEPA and the Free Trade
Agreement, investments will come to Sri Lanka for them to produce and
re-export . In my opinion we will benefit because there is a huge market
in India while ours, for India, is very negligible. With more better
terms at promoting trade balance, the CEPA should benefit our country
immensely.
As regards small vehicles, India is exporting them not only to Sri
Lanka but also to Europe, America and even Japan. India is manufacturing
very good quality vehicles.
Q: You were Deputy Minister of Fisheries in the previous cabinet.
Your views on permanently resolving the cross-border issue between the
fishermen across the Palk Strait?
A: My personal opinion always is that we should promote sustainable
development and sustainable resources. I believe in working very closely
with the regional interests. Security is the first priority. It
encompasses security of food, health, environment and the like. The
protection of freedom of speech and the protection of the different
communities and their cultures in the region should be the second
priority. In the SAARC region we have a sustainable fisheries breeding
ground. This should be protected.
The Mannar basin and the Palk Strait have fertile breeding grounds
for countries in the whole region because fishes are migratory. So
sustainability is important.
The South Indian bottom trawler fishing methods, nylon nets and other
illegal fishing methods have contributed to the debilitation of fish
stocks and breeding grounds. We have banned it.
This is a problem that has to be addressed very soon. The level of
pollution in the fishing areas in the Indian ocean is comparatively very
low and the fish are healthy and palatable.
So we have to protect it in the interests of our future generation. I
am personally aware that some groups have carried out attacks on the
fishermen of the two countries with the ulterior motive of causing
tension between the two countries.
They are also destroying fishing nets and boats and letting loose
other forms of violence. Mutually accusing without finding out what
actually is happening will not serve any useful purpose. Satellites,
radio facilities and modern communication facilities which are now
available should be taken advantage of to identify those who are behind
these and to keep track of the movement of the fishing vessels.
These communication and radio equipment cost very little, in the tune
of about Indian Rs. 10,000 or less. There is no use making accusations
without placing a system in place.
This is one issue, among others, that should be taken up for
discussion with India. Fishing grounds in the region should be common to
all but it is the question of destroying the breeding grounds and
impairing the sustainability that have to be discussed and sorted out
permanently. |