Monetary compensation for victims of police
wrongdoing:
NPC to get wider powers
By Manjula Fernando

Senaka Walgampaya
|
The National Police Commission (NPC) reconstituted in March this year
to 'Police the Police', says they have received nearly 500 complaints
against police officers within the past six months, with Gampaha and
Kalutara districts in the Western Province accounting for the highest
numbers.
The Chairman of NPC, Senaka Walgampaya a senior President's Counsel
Refuting the allegation that the Commission which has no powers to hold
disciplinary inquiries and effect dismissals, is similar to a toothless
tiger, says the mere presence is a deterrent to wrongdoing by corrupt
police officers. "A report from the NPC to the IGP will go straight to
the personal file and obstruct any promotions in the service. The
officers dread such blackmarks in their personal files."
The Chairman added that following a meeting with President Mahinda
Rajapaksa early last week, their powers are to be strengthened to give
them more teeth as an investigating arm and facilitate compensation to
victims of police wrongdoing.
Excerpts from the interview:
Q: The COPE committee is liable to report to Parliament by way
of an annual report which is almost simultaneously released to the
media. Is there a similar procedure governing the NPC?
A: Yes, we are obliged under the constitution to report to
Parliament. We are functioning for about six months now. At the end of
one year we will table a report in Parliament and then it will be in the
public domain.
Q: Earlier the National Police Commission had the powers to
effect appointments, transfers, hold disciplinary inquiries and handle
dismissals. But in the post 18th amendment phase, people allege that the
NCP has become a toothless tiger. Your comments?
A: We have realised that we lack power in certain areas. The
Commission has already drafted a Bill whereby we seek to get powers to
compensate victims of police wrongful action or inaction and to give
monetary compensation to the victims. If the Bill is enacted by
Parliament, we are seeking powers to take disciplinary action against
police officers.
We had a meeting with President Mahinda Rajapaksa and he directed us
to constitute a committee to study this in-depth and report back to him.
He directed that the committee should consist of representatives from
the Attorney General's Department, the IGP, the Defence Ministry,
Presidential Secretariat, the Treasury and the Public Service
Commission.
We will have a meeting with them within the course of the next week.
Thereafter within one month a report is to be handed over to the
President. Once we finalise a Bill, it will be placed before Cabinet and
thereafter it will go to the Legal Draftsman and the Attorney General
for their observations and clearance and then it will be presented in
Parliament.
Thereafter we can deal with the other powers given to us more
effectively. The NPC plays the role of a watchdog. Whatever the wrongful
acts police officers have committed we could report them to the IGP or
the Public Services Commission. They can take necessary action. Our role
is to 'Police' the Police.
Of the 191 complaints which we have finalised investigating, many
have been settled by just a telephone call. We call up the Police
hierarchy where the complaint has originated and they immediately attend
to it. Many of them have been resolved through negotiations.
Very recently in the Gampaha district, a complaint was received of a
bulldozer being parked by the side of a main road. It was there for more
than three years. The owner had close contact with a police OIC.
Residents made a complaint to the NPC. We took action and as a result
the bulldozer was removed.
Another day a person called the Secretary of the NPC and said, "Sir I
have been detained in the police station, without any charges. He was
not arrested or put behind bars but was simply kept there. Maybe it was
an attempt to take a bribe from the man.
I contacted the OIC of the police station and asked if a person by
this name has been arrested by them. He said 'No sir', then after
sometime the same guy rang me again and said 'sir I was released'.
The fact that the police know that somebody is watching their actions
and that people have access to the Police Commission, itself is a
deterrent. If we send a report to the IGP against a police officer, this
report goes to his personal file and that itself is a black mark and he
will not be considered for promotions after that. Hence, they don't want
any blackmarks in their personal files.
Q: You are going to seek additional powers for the NPC through
a draft Bill. With that in place will you get back powers to hold
disciplinary inquiries and effect dismissals?
A: No. If all those powers are to be restored, a
constitutional amendment is required. Under the 17th Amendment all the
powers of appointments, transfers, etc were vested with the NPC. Under
the 18th Amendment those powers were vested with the Public Service
Commission.
What we are asking through the Bill is to make provision to
compensate victims of wrongful action and wider powers to
investigate-free access to any police station, access to their log
books, to call for reports and summon police officers for
investigations.
In addition, when we make a determination, the IGP can take
disciplinary action based on our report. For the moment we cannot direct
the IGP to take action. The Department initiates their own disciplinary
inquiry based on the findings of a NPC investigation.
Q: What is the feedback you have got that the NPC has been a
catalyst in disciplining the police department, since its reactivation
in March this year?
A: We have got a lot of feedback by way of prompt action to
our mere inquiries, like for instance the release of the person who was
detained for no reason. If somebody complains to us that the Police is
doing something illegal, or if police inaction, we make inquiries. We
sought the police to release an officer on full time basis to attend to
our calls.
The IGP has agreed to assign a designated person at the Police
Headquarters, with whom we could communicate any time and take up the
issues with relevant police stations. A lot the complaints we receive
are matters we could resolve on the spot. Sometimes we don't need
extensive inquiries or investigations.
Of all the complaints we have received so far, 130 are on instances
of police inaction.
Q: Any complaints of a serious nature, such as police officers
conniving with criminals and failing to protect the interests of
ordinary citizens?
A: There are complaints of that nature but as soon as the
cases goes to Courts, we cannot get involved in it. As soon as the
matter becomes subjudice, we have no authority to investigate or inquire
into it. There were complaints like that.
They complained that they were arrested over a private feud and
police officers introduced narcotics into their person and produced them
in court. As soon as they were produced in Court, the court has to
decide whether it is a genuine complaint or not.
Q: What is the role played by the NPC in the North and the
East. Have you strengthened your presence in the conflict affected
areas?
A: We have two provincial directors in the two provinces.
Earlier we felt, that our mission is not communicated well to the North
and the East since the Newspapers printed in Colombo did not reach the
people of these provinces.
Therefore, we issued media releases, especially to vernacular
newspapers printed in the North and the East to create awareness on how
people can get our help. People can get through to us over the 1919
hotline. When they get calls they immediately forward them to us.
Q: We have come across instances when a crime is committed the
police say that they did not receive a complaint to initiate an inquiry,
especially if it involves a politician. Can the NPC intervene in such a
situation?
A: The police does not have to wait for a complaint, if a
crime is committed they have to investigate immediately. As far as we
are concerned the Constitution says that we have to act on complaints.
So we cannot initiate things.
But sometimes we have initiated inquiries in response to newspaper
reports. But in ordinary circumstances we need a complainant who would
cooperate with the NPC and tell us what happened.
If there is something in the newspapers we direct our provincial
directors to contact the police stations concerned and ask if the report
is correct.
Sometimes they initiate inquiries based on our inquiry. If it
involves a rape case where police inaction has been reported, a mere
call from the NPC gets the police into action. We have received a lot of
complaints from the Hong Kong based Asian Human Rights Watch (AHRW).
They have given names and addresses of people allegedly being
harassed by the police.
We wrote to all the people mentioned in the AHRW report. We wrote
asking for their cooperation to investigate the complaints.
But except for just one person, no one has responded to our letters.
We have written back to AHRW saying it is not useful if the complainants
do not help us to inquire into the cases. Sometimes such complaints are
made to get unnecessary publicity.
If they are scared of being exposed the complaint can be made through
a third party. We have observed a pattern to receive complaints.
Complaints are higher in number from educated sections of society and
from densely populated areas.
The people from remote areas and the less educated are scared to
stand against the police.
This may be due to the fear that if you complain against the police,
the police will retaliate and the situation will get worse. But a time
will come when people will get over this and will not hesitate to report
wrongdoing.
Q: The NPC plays a role in enhancing public-police relations?
A: We are planning in fact to conduct seminars and draw up a
program to educate the police, to get public cooperation. In fact the
President has mentioned of having people's vigilance committees.
To get the involvement of prominent people in the village - school
principals, Weda Mahattaya, Chief Incumbent of the temple, and the
police officers in these committees . We are trying to work on that now,
to allow space to resolve minor issues among the community. There is a
whole spectrum of issues to be addressed when enhancing police-public
relations.
One is to clear the fear inflicted by a long drawn conflict. Another
is the standard maintained when recruitments were made during the height
of the conflict. It was done haphazardly, the officers' job was to fight
terrorism not keeping the peace. A lot of wrong people have got in as a
result.
In the old days the recruitments involved the screening of the entire
family history for convicts. But during the past 30 years, standards
have dropped.
Q: How many complaints have you received up to date?
A: The Commission was reconstituted in March. A total of 451
complaints have been received so far out of which, 191 inquiries have
been concluded. We have set up provincial offices and appointed nine
directors to each of the provinces. In addition we have set up two
district offices in Gampaha and Kalutara because most of the complaints
are received from these areas.
Q: What action has the NPC has initiated against these
complaints?
A: If we find a police officer guilty of wrongdoing in our
investigations, we report the matter to the IGP and to the Public
Service Commission and we leave it to them to take necessary action. At
the moment the NPC is not vested with any power to take disciplinary
action against Police officers.
Q: What is the criteria to recruit investigative officers to
ensure they act impartially?
A: Except for the Northern Province, in Jaffna, where we recruited a
retired SSP, in all other places we have got the top rung of the public
service. We have appointed nine provincial directors and two district
directors.They are people of the highest integrity. They are all from
the public service, such as retired government agents and additional
secretaries of ministries. They are all Class One or Special Class
officers in the Public Service.
NPC Secretary T.M.K.B. Tennakoon was also associated with the
interview.
|