Sri Lanka among the world’s best in human rights - Vasudeva
Nanayakkara
By Uditha KUMARASINGHE
Vasudeva Nanayakkara, the firebrand of Sri Lankan left politics, is a
national leader who felt the heartbeat of the downtrodden. Vasu started
his political career in the 1950s as an active member of the Samasamaja
Youth Movement and soon became its leader.
In 1970 he entered Parliament for the first time representing
Kiriella. Since then, he represented the Ratnapura district in
Parliament on many occasions. He has been beaten, jailed and forced
underground due to his political activism which has won him the hearts
of the working class and the minority communities.
As the National Languages and Social Integration Minister, his
ultimate goal is to unite Sri Lanka by winning the hearts and minds of
diverse people who on the basis of equality struggling for democracy and
social justice have been the essence of Vasu’s political life and many
are the sacrifices he made to build a just society.
The Minister told the Sunday Observer that Sri Lanka is one of the
best countries in human rights practices. We have a functioning
democracy over the last so many decades since we became an independent
sovereign country while in South Asia, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal
had been going through dictatorships of kings and military leaders on
various occasions in contrast to our country. However, we should take a
serious note of any allegations made bonafide-not malafide.
The Minister said there are certain countries and international
organisations which are trying to spite us by raising various issues
which we should reject. We must see whether there is anything that we
should do towards bringing about standard for human rights to be
observed, human rights respect and human rights conditions to reasonable
levels of practice as being done in other countries.
Minister Nanayakkara said that a full-fledged Provincial Council for
the North would be the foundation stone for peace and reconciliation.
The actual operative democracy will come to life only with the PC
elections being held. In addition, if Provincial Councils are vested
with more powers, they would feel that the power-sharing is well
practised to help reach reconciliation and resolve problems faced by
them in the North and the East.
Excerpts of the interview:
Q: Some of the Provincial Councils are beset with internal rivalries
among its members, waste of public funds and the image-building
exercises as we are witnessing today. How could its functions be
regulated to make them more progressive bodies?
A: Even If the disputes are on the same side, the writ of the party
must prevail. If it is a political issue of a serious nature, the
discipline alone will not suffice.
Then you have to discuss the matter in depth on the political line
and reasoning and try to resolve it - the political disputes.
On the other hand the rivalries among the individuals of the same
side are not anything new. It has been there all the time under all
circumstances. We have to live with it.
That is personal ambition and conflict of personalities and a number
of things contribute to it, but no ideological depth. Therefore, there
is nothing to worry.
Q: The Government’s investment on infrastructure in the North is
unprecedented. Do you have your own priorities to add to this to promote
national harmony?
A: Yes. Principally the livelihood means, the people who were
resettled after terrorism in their own villages and the neighbourhood
should be provided the necessary facilities to the maximum possible
extent and it should only be an exception that they are relocated in
different places. An environment and atmosphere conducive to them to
live with confidence and feel at home as in normal times is also very
important.
Q: Opposition Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe has demanded a salary
increase of Rs.10,000 for Government and private sector workers to
cushion the impact of sky-rocketing costs of living. As a sympathiser
with the working class, how do you look at this demand?
A: They need an increment to their basic salary, not an additional
allowance as such that had been given previously. I propose that all
allowances so far given be added to the basic salary so as to give them
the advantage of their pension being enhanced and their overtime,
travelling and other perks too enhanced. In addition, their frozen cost
of living allowance, has to be paid.
Q: The education authorities have pointed out that overall funding
for education is quite adequate. If so, is the university dons’ demand
for six percent not reasonable or ill-advised?
A: I think the amount allocated for education is grossly
insufficient. We are a country which has free education from primary to
university level. Therefore, we are not comparable to any other country
which has to spend six percent where no free education is available.
However, the present amount allocated for education is insufficient.
To my knowledge, the necessary capital expenditure for Sabaragamuwa
Province for 2012 was Rs.1200 million.
This could only help get the essential repairs done and the essential
equipment provided to the large number of schools under the Provincial
Council. When the Provincial Council needs Rs.1,200 million, the Central
Government has provided only Rs.387 million.
This shows the inadequacy of the allocation at the Central Government
level. This is only one example. When you work out the provision for the
whole island, I think six percent is a just and fair allocation. But we
can’t proceed with it.
We have to gradually develop into it while mobilising funds for
Government revenue.
That doesn’t fall from the sky. So we have to tap the Stock Exchange
at least 15 percent from the capital gains and charge the due levies to
the Government fully like the plantation companies which pay a minimum
of about Rs.13,000 million per year as the rent doesn’t yield more than
Rs.487 million. If you collect these dues which are the entitlement of
the Government revenue, we could find the money.
Q: What is the impact of the FUTA action on education and the
university system? What can the authorities do to address this
situation?
A: It is unfortunate that the FUTA had to resort to strike action. It
should have been settled short of strike action. The strike action has
resulted in the closure of universities for three months which has hit
the student community, economy and our entire social fabric. Therefore,
the Government should have taken steps to prevent it from ending up in a
strike. Both parties should have been wiser.
Q: The Eastern Provincial Council is already functioning and
elections are due for the Northern PC. What is the importance of having
a full-fledged PC for the North in terms of peace and reconciliation?
A: Democracy. It is the foundation stone for peace and
reconciliation. The actual operative democracy will come to life only
with the PC elections being held. In addition,
Provincial Councils are being given more powers so that they would
feel that the power-sharing will help in a very big way to reach
reconciliation and resolve the national question.
Q: What is the importance of all parties coming together for the
Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC)? Should the UNP, JVP and TNA have a
more positive attitude towards this process?
A: They are actually subverting and undermining the process. The JVP,
UNP and TNA say that they have no confidence in it. Then what do they
propose? They have no alternative proposals.
They propose a dialogue between the Government and the TNA. That
would not surprise. All parties that have formed the UPFA and all other
parties in the Parliament should be present when it is a national issue
where a formula has to be worked out on a consensual basis.
Therefore, the obstinate refusal of the TNA, JVP and the UNP to
participate in this select committee causes greater harm to the ethnic
relations which could have been settled earlier.
Q: There seems to be another push by certain countries to probe human
rights issues in Sri Lanka. What kind of impact can this have on our
reconciliation process?
A: No problem. We should have discussions on human rights. We should
review our own human rights records. We should take seriously any
bonafide allegations. There are certain countries and international
organisations which are out to spite us by raising various issues. We
should reject them outright. But we should see whether there is anything
that we could do towards bringing about any standard for human rights to
be observed, or human rights conditions to reasonable levels of practice
as is being done in other countries. I think we are one of the best
countries in the human rights practice, because we had a functioning
democracy over the past so may decades since we became an independent
and sovereign country.
Even in south Asia-Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal had been going
through dictatorships of kings and military leaders at various instances
very much in contrast to our country. Therefore, human rights practice
is a normal thing except during disturbing times or insurgencies.
Then of course, the whole thing becomes upset by the conditions that
require the restoration of peace and cessation of violence which will
have excesses. Undoubtedly in such situations we must address the
excesses and try to remedy them.
Q: How do you evaluate your national languages and social integration
programs or projects in the context of national reconciliation?
A: I think we are doing very well and we are taking a leap forward in
teaching Sinhala and Tamil in the entire country, to public officials in
particular and eventually foster relations between different ethnic
communities in a cordial atmosphere.
In addition, we want to bring back the marginalized people into the
main stream of society. So we are conducting a series of activities on
the language, social integration and ethnic relations which would
produce very good results in time to come. We believe we should be able
to reach our goals within the next two to three years.
That is to bring about bilingual literacy to the whole country and
possibly trilingual literacy with the support and guidance of the
Presidential Task Force in charge of trilingual project.
Q: What is the success of the trilingual program for MPs (Tamil
classes for Sinhala MPs) and why is trilingualism essential for Sri
Lanka?
A: It’s continuing. They have finished the course and they want to
continue further. So we will continue the Tamil classes if they want
them anymore and conduct discussions in spoken Tamil to the Sinhala MPs.
If there are Tamil MPs who are in need, we would do the same. Now
English is being provided for the MPs who want English literacy.
Q: Will not the current worldwide technological revolution render
communism, socialism or other political theories obsolete and ensure
better living standards for the people?
A: No. Technology does not change the society on class divisions.
Technology changes only the productivity. Productivity being increased
does not erase the class lines of the society and the social
fragmentations.
Therefore, this ‘trickle-down’ theory has not worked so far and the
technology is not going to do better. Socialism will be the one solution
even for the future of the entire humanity, since the present neoliberal
economy has proved to have failed and today we are witnessing it. From
1970s we see a downward trend in the economic output, under-capacity
economies running into crisis, unemployment rising, growth rates falling
and debt crisis resulting in the bankruptcy of states.
So all these are a part of the neoliberal economy and the high
technology has not been able to resolve this crisis.
High technology on the contrary has bred more corruption and more
deceit which has reflected in the debt crisis and the crash of the banks
in America.
Q: As a leftist politician what is your contribution to promote the
lot of the working class and uphold their dignity?
A: I have been in the trade union movement. As a chairperson of one
of the trade unions, we try to achieve a better living standard for
workers through the parity of wages to the cost-of-living, - the actual
expenditure worked out on the basis of inflation to keep the
cost-of-living and wages parallel. On the other hand, the real income of
the workers is being kept at the level of real expenditure. Then we
should be able to at least maintain their living standards. If it is not
improved, we will have to ensure a higher income for workers than the
real expenditure.
Q: Politician “Vasu” is looked upon as one who does not indulge in
politicking or compromising his principles. Are you satisfied with your
political odyssey or still persist in your political aims?
A: I am satisfied as far as my conscience and my convictions are
concerned.
But it is left to others to judge me and I will always examine their
judgement with all seriousness. |