Reflections on a patriot and legend of our times
By Dr. Telli Rajaratnam
“Some men are born
great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them”
- William Shakespeare
Dr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa is a ‘born leader’ as he has exercised
effective leadership as Secretary of Defence and Urban Development.
‘Some achieve greatness’ denotes, above all, those whose greatness is
self-made. But all great leaders must be regarded as achievers, whatever
their advantages of birth and training.
 |
After surviving the
assassination attempt |
Alexander the Great was born to kingship and inherited a strong army.
With Aristotle as his tutor, he was perhaps the most privileged person,
educationally, that there has ever been. Nevertheless, what he achieved
in his short life was beyond anything that could remotely have been
expected of him.
Much the same is true of Julius Caesar. He was a young Roman
aristocrat whose career began as a demagogic politician, but who turned
out to be a military commander of genius. The trajectory of his career
could never have been predicted.
Napoleon is the supreme example of the utterly self-made leader - the
man who ‘achieved greatness’ by his own unaided efforts. When he was on
his way to St Helena, he was still slightly younger than John F. Kennedy
at the time of his assassination. And Napoleon was not a millionaire’s
son.
Gotabaya Rajapaksa was born on June 20, 1949. We now have freedom of
movement, development and more tourists coming into this beautiful isle.
Citizens of Sri Lanka and the citizens of other countries whose
citizenship of origin was Sri Lanka are coming to Sri Lanka after
several years owing to the peaceful situation created by the Defence
Secretary and President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
Gotabaya Rajapaksa assumed duties as Secretary, Ministry of Defence,
Public Security, Law and Order on November 25, 2005.
He joined the Sri Lanka Army in 1971, spent 20 years in service, and
held the appointment of Deputy Commandant of Sir John Kotelawala Defence
University in 1991 and, as a Lieutenant Colonel, was Coordinating
Officer of the Welioya area from 1990 to 1991.
Prior to that, he was the Coordinating Officer of the Matale District
and the Commanding Officer of the 1st Battalion, Gajaba Regiment from
1989 to 1990. He has also held numerous other positions in the Sri Lanka
Army such as Instructor, Adjutant and Staff officer to the Operations
Officer commanding contingents.
Fact file |
Born on June 20, 1949
Joined Sri Lanka Army in 1971
Commanded 1st Battalion of Gajaba Regiment in Vadamarachchi in 1987
Awarded President’s Commendation by President J.R. Jayewardene
Awarded Rana Wickrama Padakkama (RWP) and Rana Sura Padakkama (RSP)
by Presidents R. Premadasa and D.B. Wijetunga
Appointed Defence Secretary in 2005
Awarded Doctorate from University of Colombo |
During his military career, he has been awarded the President’s
Commendation letter by former President J.R. Jayewardene and medals for
valour in combat such as Rana Wickrama Padakkama (RWP), Rana Sura
Padakkama (RSP) – by former Presidents R. Premadasa and D.B. Wijetunga.
He has also received a commendation from the Commander of the Army for
his bravery in action.
Courage
Most who achieve anything in the world are ambitious and some have
exalted ambitions which they never have the chance to realise. A few
rise higher than they or anyone else could have imagined, and then prove
equal to the challenge. Like those born to great offices who prove,
against the odds, worthy to hold them, such people have ‘greatness
thrust upon them’.
Courage, fearless speech and absolute honesty are the tenets of Dr.
Gotabaya’s success. He cannot pretend. He is forthright with raw honesty
and speaks his mind and heart. This has been advantageous as well as
disadvantageous to him.
Of all the qualities required for leadership, only one is
indispensable - courage. Without it, all the others are more or less
useless. Courage has been shown by all who we recognise as true leaders,
from Alexander to Thatcher.
A leader must have the ability to take tough decisions and calculated
risks. Leaders have to give courage to others, while creating the
illusion that they know exactly what they are doing.
Gotabaya Rajapaksa was born great, achieved greatness and has
greatness thrust upon him by his absolute honesty. As all human beings,
we have short memories. More so, for patriotism.
People tend to forget the most important factors which have
historical value. The most memorable historical factor was winning the
war against terrorism. The joint effort of the Armed Forces under the
able directives of the Defence Secretary and the leadership of the
President rescued the nation from the evils of terrorism.
Anti-terrorist operations
He has commanded many anti-terrorist operations in the North and the
East in different capacities. Among them was his command of the 1st
Battalion of the Gajaba Regiment in the important Vadamarachchi
Operation in 1987 and Operation Thrividabalaya in 1990 respectively, to
rescue the Jaffna peninsula and Jaffna Fort from terrorist control.
He completed his basic officer cadet training at the prestigious
Military Academy at Diyatalawa and proceeded to Pakistan to complete the
Young Officers’ Course at Rawalpindi, and later the mid-career course at
Quetta. He had advanced training in Counter Insurgency and Jungle
Warfare at Assam, India. Later in his career, he graduated in Advanced
Infantry Training from Infantry School Fort Benning, USA.
As a staff officer, he completed his Staff Course at the Defence
Services Staff College in Wellington, India in 1983. He obtained his
Masters Degree in Defence Studies from the University of Madras in 1983.
He has also obtained a Postgraduate Degree in Information Technology
from the University of Colombo in 1992.
He is a revered figure in Sri Lanka for leading the military
operation which drove out the opponents from the entire Eastern Province
of the country. He survived an assassination attempt in December 2006.
He was the grundnorm for the victory of the 2009 war against the
LTTE. In recognition of the services rendered to the nation, the
University of Colombo conferred a Doctorate on him.
Our Air Force pilots have returned to base. The air strikes have
halted. The Naval boats have slowed their speed. The Army has slowed its
pace. Aggression against innocent people by the LTTE has been halted.
When the President ordered our Armed Forces into combat as the
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, he had three clear goals: To
enable the Tamil people, the victims of some of the most vicious
atrocities in the North due to terrorists and militant groups, to return
to their homes with safety; to destroy the LTTE; and to deploy the Armed
Forces to protect all the people of the North. Those goals were
achieved.
An unnecessary conflict has been brought to a just and honourable
conclusion. We have sent a message of determination and hope to the
entire world.
His doctrine
The doctrine of Gotabaya Rajapaksa is discipline, honesty, effective
strategies, straight talk, courage, wisdom and above all love for the
country before self.
Think of all the millions of innocent people who died in this bloody
century because democracies reacted too late to evil and aggression.
Because, the duty of the Defence Secretary was well performed, the past
is gone, not with helpless indignation, but with a hopeful affirmation
of human dignity and human rights.
In a world too divided by fear among people of different racial,
ethnic and religious groups, he has given confidence to the friends of
freedom and pause to those who would exploit human differences for
inhuman purposes.
History tells us that solidarity means strength, progress and
success. Peace, co-operation, development and progress are what the
entire international community is hoping and striving for. The
developing nations must continue to work closely together in the spirit
of solidarity and co-operation and raise their voice and strengthen
their position in international affairs if they are to secure their
fundamental interests.
UN
One of the magnificent achievements of the United Nations (UN) has
been the transformation that has taken place in global opinion on the
relationship that should form between the governing and the governed,
between the government and the citizen.
It was on the basis of the moral authority of the General Assembly’s
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the determined endeavours of
the Commission on Human Rights, that this transformation was achieved.
The dignity of the individual has now, largely as a result of United
Nations leadership in the field of human rights, been placed, as it
should be, among the priorities of national and international attention.
The Universal Declaration on Human Rights is not limited in scope to
ensuring the observance of human rights by governments alone. It has a
far wider purpose: The observance of human rights by all governmental
and non-governmental parties alike.
Article 3 of the Universal Declaration, which requires that everyone
has the right to life; and the provisions of Article 30 of the
Declaration prescribes that: “Nothing in this Declaration may be
interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to
engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of
any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein”.
An act of terrorism by a non-governmental entity against civilians is
surely a violation of the human rights of its victims and, surely, a
crime against humanity as well.
We know the horrific consequences of terrorism: The horror; the
thousands of unsuspecting innocent lives lost or maimed, the thousands
of families then left to grieve; the countless personal tragedies that
terrorism leaves.
The horrors of terrorism have devastated the country and have cast a
heavy burden on successive governments and the nation including all of
us and on humanity as a whole. There are also the larger disruptions of
national stability and order as well; of the economy and the customary
ways of life.
We remember the bombing of the Central Bank, the adjacent buildings,
the Temple of the Tooth Relic and other temples, the buses and trains in
Sri Lanka where numerous people of all communities were killed, injured,
the numerous innocent civilians who were killed and each of us would
have a story to tell about the injuries sustained or the deaths of our
loved ones.
Gotabaya Rajapaksa, as Defence Secretary, directed the Armed Forces
to go ahead with their assertive, offensive and defensive action which
led to victory over the LTTE. It is in this connection that the
President liberated the Tamil people.
The exodus was like Moses giving freedom to the Jews from Egypt. But
the difference is that the Tamil people were liberated by President
Rajapaksa, while some of our friends overseas have, from time to time,
been misled by those marketing terrorism for their own corporate
interests. We should therefore not be surprised that allegations of
civilian casualties in the present times generate from certain corporate
interests involved in international terrorism and their complex trade
beneficiaries.
Military necessity
For over 30 years, we have been unable to solve this problem. We
required a balance between the need to achieve a military victory and
the needs of humanity. In this sense, necessity has been viewed as a
limitation to unbridled barbarity.
The application of the doctrine of military necessity makes use of
the principle of proportionality as a mechanism for determining the
positioning of a fulcrum between these competing poles. Using
proportionality thus gives effect to the recognition that the choice of
methods and means of conducting war or armed conflict are not unlimited.
The means and methods of conducting war operate to achieve a
particular military objective, which consequently assists in achieving a
larger political objective. While necessity might determine the
legitimacy of the armed attack, proportionality determines the amount of
force that might be used. In a sense, necessity operates at a macro
level, while International Humanitarian Law operates at a micro level,
though both might lie on the same continuum given the difficulties in
the transition.
This difficulty is most apparent when the principles of necessity and
proportionality have been incorporated into conventional international
law, particularly international humanitarian conventions. The
development of these conventions and the application of these principles
require some consideration if one is to arrive at an understanding of
their application in a modern armed conflict.
Military necessity has been described as “a basic principle of the
law of war, so basic, indeed, that without it there could be no law of
war at all.” The acceptance that, while the object of warfare is to
achieve the submission of the enemy, which may require the disabling of
as many enemy combatants as possible, this should only be achieved in a
manner that does not cause any unnecessary suffering or damage. This
limitation to the means of waging war is not, however, necessarily
humanitarian in nature and much of the early restraints were based on
economic, political and military considerations. However, the need for a
balance between the considerations of humanity and the military actions
necessary to win a war is regarded as defining the very nature of
International Humanitarian Law, making military necessity a central
principle in this balance.
The ‘principle of distinction’ is fundamental to humanitarian law,
but its precise content varies according to the kind of conflict. In
national liberation struggles - and international armed conflicts - the
distinction is between ‘civilians’ and ‘combatants.’ Combatants have no
right to life under humanitarian law. Every individual is classified as
either a combatant or as a kind of protected person, such as a prisoner
of war (a captured combatant) or a civilian. An individual’s rights
change when his classification changes. A civilian has the right not to
be targeted for attack and the right to receive some protection from
attack. If the civilian joins the armed militants, he exchanges the
rights of a civilian for the rights of a combatant. A combatant has the
right to take part in hostilities.
UDA
The Urban Development Authority now comes under the purview of the
Defence Ministry. The Development Plan for the City of Colombo, the
theme of the Sujatha Jayewardena Memorial Speech by Dr. Gotabaya
Rajapaksa at the Sri Lanka Foundation Institute, was presented in a
coherent and scholarly manner and was well-received and ably
strengthened public aspirations for the transformation. The desire to
move toward a sustainable eco-city to optimise the quality of life for
its community gained significant momentum soon after the end of the war
against terrorism and dividends of peace in Sri Lanka.
By encouraging the innovation of green architecture and technology,
he lucidly clarified the way in which a coherent framework for applying
sustainable design to all sectors of society in developing the Colombo
City would enhance the quality of life of the community, making the city
vibrant and modern. The rate of unprecedented population growth over
years increased the urban population while thinning the rural
population.
Urbanisation was a major cause for increased urban dwellers living in
poverty. The cultural, social and political consequences of this
transformation are enormous and the long-term effects difficult to
foresee and therefore difficult to plan for.
Urbanisation is inherent in economic and cultural development and the
trends are common. Local conditions may temporarily speed up or slow
down the process, but urbanisation can neither be stopped nor reversed.
Ways to meet the challenges and manage rapid urban growth and mitigate
subsequent economic despair have become important and imperative to
smooth the progress of equitable income distribution and creating wealth
for the nation. Modernisation of the city provides opportunities and
benefits and the rapid transition over time with good governance
overcomes inherent urban problems and poverty. Increase in per capita
income comes with the modernisation of the city, which could contribute
even more to the national economy, thus reducing poverty and creating
more habitats, health, clean water, prosperity and happiness.
Spontaneous shanty towns sans essential services where conditions are
depressed are also the products of failed policies of the past, bad
governance, inappropriate legal and regulatory frameworks, dysfunctional
markets, unresponsive financial systems, corruption, and a lack of
political will.
Developing the Colombo City in an environmentally-sustainable manner
in Sri Lanka may require action by both the private sector and civil
society and political leadership that support laissez-faire including
proficient and essentially transparent urban councils.
Planning, developing and managing our urban environments better will
benefit health and improve environmental outcomes. Public health
intervention to reduce dependence on motor vehicles thus improves air
quality, locating jobs, services, schools and shops close to where
people live, promoting active modes of transport (walking and cycling)
and providing mass transit options. This is good for the environment
because it reduces carbon dioxide emissions and is good for business
because it reduces the cost of traffic congestion. Mass transit is
particularly good for young people, the elderly and the disabled, who
may not have access to a motor vehicle.
The profile of our population and their needs and aspirations will
also be very different in the future. How can Colombo continue to be a
special place for its community, a home that offers hope and
opportunities, a home that offers a high standard of living and above
all, a city that is socially inclusive, where no one is left out?
Concluding his deliberation, Gotabaya Rajapaksa appealed for national
consensus to make that vision a reality.
This is the moment when we must come together. Let’s commit to share
our knowledge to build the ‘Grand City’. The scale of our challenge is
great. With courage, with heart and hand, let us all get together to
take Sri Lanka forward. |