Private sector participation in HIV mitigation vital
It had been estimated that around 4,200 HIV infections, two new
infections a week and 260 AIDS deaths took place in 2011. Can we still
ignore this issue? Asks Chairman, Lanka Business Coalition on HIV and
AIDS, (LBCH), Kishu Gomes.
HIV and AIDS risk mitigation
Private sector employees, number over five million people out of the
country's total workforce of approximately nine million. If you look
around the world for recent examples of economic growth, you would find
that it is due to technology, trade, land and natural resources, capital
investment and people resources. While we have all these factors in
limited quantity, the biggest asset we have is people. Therefore, we
stress the need for business leaders to recognise the magnitude of the
issue with two new HIV cases reported every week.
While Sri Lanka is considered a low prevalence country, given that
the country's economic growth is centred around tourism, foreign
employment, trade, sports marketing and export related travelling, our
workforce has become highly vulnerable.

In this backdrop, we business leaders have to work together to
mitigate this huge potential risk our workforce is faced with.
Think beyond social responsibility
There have been many individual success stories in business response
to the epidemic, but this is not enough. Partnering the national
response to HIV and AIDS needs to be an intrinsic component of the way
in which a company operates.
Isolated centres of expertise, resources and material are available
within the business sector, but there is a lack of engagement by
corporates to access resources and best practices. The triple bottom-
line focus with adequate attention to people is the way forward and we
need to protect our people if we are to honour our commitment as
business leaders.
The social and economic costs of HIV and AIDS to the global community
are stark and well documented. In the Asia Pacific region alone, around
10 million people could now (2010 statistics) be living with HIV and
AIDS.
The International Labour Organisation estimates that close to one
million people in the region are unable to work because of AIDS related
illnesses. The annual financial loss to the region associated with the
disease has been estimated by the Asian Development Bank to be over US $
17.5 billion. The best we can do as business leaders is to learn and act
with commitment to minimise the social and economic impact it would
otherwise have.
The epidemic has the potential to undermine sustained growth of the
Sri Lankan market because it strikes at the most economically active age
groups - the workforce, people aged from 16 to 49. These costs are not
just a concern for public policy makers; they are a matter of serious
concern to all businesses operating in the country.
The business community should respond to HIV not just out of
humanitarian concern but for sound economic reasons. The lead role in
fighting diseases like HIV and AIDS one could argue, should be borne by
the government. However, there are now many examples from around the
world of better outcomes when the public and private sector work in
partnership to achieve an important development goal.
Businesses and business leaders can and should play a vital role, by
proactively acting now.
Implications to business
Let's learn from countries with a high prevalence of HIV and AIDS.
Business organisations in those countries are paying for their own
mistakes and ignorance. We should not make the same mistakes in Sri
Lanka. At individual company level it makes sense to develop an
effective prevention plan. Look first at the bottom line. HIV cuts into
planned company expenses by increasing costs of employee healthcare,
recruitment and training.
Companies with employees who become HIV positive are likely to see a
reduction in productivity as staff become ill. As prevalence levels rise
profits are impacted as expenses increase, service delivery fails to
adhere to planned schedules, and customers change their purchasing plans
because of the HIV expenses they incur. Given the magnitude of the issue
and complex action needed, joining all other governmental and
non-governmental organisations with a collaborative approach is a must
in my view.
CEOs and Senior Managers of successful companies view their workforce
as their most important asset. They are therefore unlikely to be so
short sighted as to not want to protect their employees' health. Leading
companies are aware that their responsibility goes beyond producing a
satisfactory return for their shareholders and to have a positive
interaction with the broader community of which they form a part. |