Welcoming the Pope and shunning Dalai Lama
by Thalif Deen
When the United States established diplomatic relations with the Holy
See back in January 1984, a televangelist asked rather sarcastically:
when will Mecca send its own ambassador to Washington DC?
“It’s an odd fact of history,” ruminates Time magazine, “that the
world’s youngest empire, the US, established diplomatic relations with
the oldest, the Holy See, only a little over 30 years ago under
President Ronald Reagan,” who was long described as an advocate of
church-state separation.
Over the last 70 years of the UN’s existence, successive Popes,
representing more than one billion Catholics, have had the privilege of
addressing the 193-member General Assembly.
Pope John Paul II addressed the UN in 1979 and 1995 and Pope Benedict
XVI spoke to delegates in 2008. Pope Francis, who addressed the UN’s
highest policy-making body on Friday (25), will be the fourth to speak
before the UN.
But other religious leaders, including Buddhists, Hindus and Muslims,
have never been offered that privilege – except participation in
high-level forums.
Since Islam is not an institutionalized religion, it does not have
the equivalent of either a Pope or a Vatican — although there are more
than 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, perhaps far exceeding Catholics.
The Holy See is not a full-fledged UN member state but only holds the
status of a “non-member observer state” — like Palestine. Asked if there
were any other religious leaders who were known to have addressed the
world body, UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq told IPS: “It’s possible,
if a religious leader were a head of state.”
He still admitted, it was ‘hard to say.’ In July 1974, Archbishop
Makarios, first president of the Republic of Cyprus, addressed the UN
Security Council after his ouster following the invasion of Cyprus by
Greece.
However, what has been unequivocally re-affirmed over the last few
decades is that the Dalai Lama, the spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhists,
continues to be barred from the UN and virtually declared persona non
grata — primarily for political reasons.Tibet is currently under Chinese
rule but there are dissident groups, which want to break away from China
seeking independence.
But China, a veto-wielding permanent member of the Security Council
has taken a tough stand against Tibetan dissidents – and specifically
the Dalai Lama, although he would accept Tibet as a genuine autonomous
region within the People’s Republic of China.
Saying no to Dalai Lama
With various UN member states trying to keep dissidents and
separatists out of the world body, the battle has occasionally shifted
to the United Nations.
When the Dalai Lama was invited to address a religious meeting in the
late 1990s, the Chinese got wind of it – and the ambassador personally
registered his protest at the 38th floor of the Secretary-General,
ensuring the Dalai Lama would not address any gathering inside the UN
building. A similar episode took place earlier when the Dalai Lama was
barred from participating or addressing the UN Human Rights conference
in June 1993 in the Austrian capital of Vienna.
Joe Lauria, UN correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, told IPS:
“I recall when the UN Correspondents’ Association (UNCA) in May 1993
invited Chinese dissident Shen Tong to come to the UN and UN security,
on orders from then Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, blocked him
at the visitor’s entrance, where I stood to greet him on behalf of UNCA.”
“I brought him into the building eventually and all the way to UNCA’s
door where security guards wouldn’t let him go further. So we took him
back to the street where we held the press conference in front of the
gate. I remember it got lots of coverage all day.” But Lauria said he
does not recall the Dalai Lama being blocked from entering the UN
premises. Speaking on condition of anonymity, another longstanding UN
correspondent told IPS about the arrival of a delegation of ‘ordinary’
Tibetans for a meeting at the UN, many moons ago.
“They were Canadian citizens and came in wearing Western clothes.
Once in, they changed into traditional dress. The Chinese were furious
but there were no grounds to kick out Canadians,” he said. Another
ex-journalist and former UN Bureau Chief told IPS, the Dalai Lama has
never been allowed to address the UN — courtesy of China.
“I discovered this years ago when there was a conference of world
religious leaders.” He had to ‘cancel’ an appearance even at the
Cathedral of St. John the Divine on the Upper West side of New York
city.
“When I asked cathedral officials why they were allowing the
extraterritorial jurisdiction by the UN, they said lamely that the Dalai
Lama had other engagements and couldn’t make it. I always doubted that,
but Buddhists don’t come out shouting.”
Javier El-Hage, Chief Legal Officer, Human Rights Foundation (HRF)
told IPS that HRF believes, in order to truly be the voice of the
voiceless, Pope Francis should use the privilege of speaking at the
United Nations to speak on behalf of the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan
people, whose voices are routinely silenced by the powerful Chinese
dictatorship.
“Unfortunately, there is little hope that the highest representative
of Catholicism will do this, given that last year he declined to meet
with the Dalai Lama in Rome precisely in order not to upset China’s
rulers.”
Pope Francis should consider that, as with any other valuable asset,
a religious leader’s huge moral capital can go to waste when he fails to
use the opportunity to truly stand with the poor, the oppressed, the
downtrodden, and instead chooses to take friendly pictures with and
provide legitimacy to authoritarian leaders, he added.
-IPS
|