Eleven years after the 2004 tsunami:
The risk of undermining risk
by Ranil Wijayapala
Eleven years ago, many Sri Lankans who did not know the word tsunami
- added the Japanese word to their vocabulary; a single word associated
with devastation and descriptive of the biggest natural disaster the
island faced in recorded history.
Tsunami means 'harbour wave' or high sea waves caused by an
earthquake or other disturbance.

Deep harbour waves developing against the Sri Lankan coast
(eosweb.larc.nasa.gov) |
Together with the tsunami came a costly lesson for the unprepared
island; about massive human loss and property destruction. Over 30,000
lives were lost in an hour while damages to property were estimated to
be close to US$ 1 billion. The trauma caused to the population in
addition to other forms of loss, remains incalculable.
Eleven years on, it seems that there are many lessons still to be
learnt: the reason for Sri Lanka, a coastal nation considered at low
risk, to still commemorate the December 26 tsunami, in a bid to keep the
idea of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) alive.
According to Anoja Seneviratne, Director Mitigation, Research and
Development, Disaster Management Centre, since the 2004 tsunami, Sri
Lanka's awareness levels have improved in leaps and bounds. In addition,
emergency operation mechanisms and early warning systems have been
quickly put in place. What is disappointing is the public response to
keeping their 2004 memories alive to stay safe.
The first step in post tsunami was to appoint a Parliament Select
Committee to look into the disaster management systems available in the
country. From that flowed a second initiative of formulating the
necessary institutional and legal framework to manage future disasters.
Policy initiatives
Five months later, a National Disaster Management Act was introduced,
creating an apex body - the National Council for Disaster Management
-headed by the President.
The Disaster Management Centre (DMC) was established to implement
decisions taken by the National Council and the process was laid out
through a new Disaster Management Policy.
"The National Disaster Management Policy promotes human safety as the
first priority and minimum damage to the physical and mental health,
reduction of damages to infrastructure and properties as well as the
development process," Seneviratne added.
Following the legislative and institutional framework, a National
Disaster Management Plan, National Emergency Operations Plan and
Disaster Management Plans for all the ministries and public institutions
were created. The DMC-the central co-ordinating body was set up with 25
Disaster Management Coordinating Committees in all districts.
Accordingly, the country now enjoys the institutional framework to
ensure 'disaster risk reduction, disaster management, disaster response,
disaster risk management.'
At present, there are 77 Tsunami Early Warning Towers, covering the
entire coastal belt. DMC is linked to the international tsunami
monitoring and early warning systems, including the Indian, Australian,
Japanese and Pacific early warning networks.
The DMC works closely with the administrative mechanism at the level
of District Secretaries and Divisional Secretaries, to reach the
grassroots. The dissemination of warnings is generally carried out with
the help of the army, police and communication networks.
Infrastructure protection
An important aspect in DRR is the attention paid to damage to
infrastructure, especially in the coastal areas.
"There is new building construction and maintenance guidelines to
ensure the structures are tsunami-safe and resilient. We support new
technology, use of construction methods and use of material that can
help create disaster-safe buildings, both public and private," added
Seneviratne.
"Buffer zones were created to regulate the coastal areas where
private homes and business structures. We have a thriving coastal
tourism industry. The buffer zones are key to ensuring the protection of
the people and structures. It's the first line of defence," explained
Seneviratne, who said, it was a constant battle to educate protesting
citizens as to why a buffer zone is necessary.
"We also request them have their buildings insured to mitigate
financial loss and reconstruction costs."
Though a main feature in keeping the public informed and updated, a
key problem faced by the authorities is the conversion of mock drills
into a mockery by populations at risk. "Often, only women attend the
tsunami drills, making it a redundant exercise. Most men in the tsunami
prone areas don't attend drills, making it difficult for us to keep
entire communitiews risk-prepared," Seneviratne lamented. |