Disturbingly realistic
A review of Somalatha Subasinghe's 'Vikurthi':
by Dilshan Boange
"Tuition-bio, tuition-pure, chemistry, physics, chemistry, bio,
tuition bio..." was a chorus I heard first in the early 90s on TV. Back
then I only knew it as a song from a stage drama. But at the Lionel
Wendt last week, watching Vikurthi, the Sinhala play written by the late
Somalatha Subasinghe, I was served a wholly realistic perspective about
how education has been perverted to serve the sole purpose of
overambitious parents driven to seek upward social mobility at the
expense of their children's emotional wellbeing.
The torment through 'tuition' in the life of schoolchildren is
nothing new in Sri Lanka. Caught up in the rat race of West
influenced/driven consumerism and hyper competitiveness, one of the main
casualties are children whose childhood is tethered to a 'strive to win'
attitude in an ever increasingly competitive battle to get the 'best
deal' 'life' has to offer. A pivotal trump card in this game is
university education, which is a very crucial upward mobility factor for
the masses.

Priyangani (played by Geetha Alahakoon) with her parents
(played by Kaushalya Fernando and Prasannajith Abeysuriya) |
Vikurthi, which generally translates to English as 'deformed' is a
well thought-out theatrical critique of where Sri Lankan society is
heading in the aftermath of the open economy that began after 1977. It
shows the unwholesome 'obsession' some parents have to make their
children doctors or engineers. It shows the price at which parental
aspirations for the child may come true, and questions what really
constitutes happiness in life. Running in the veins of this play are the
drilling questions what is the worth of education today? And what is the
role of education in social mobility? Does happiness rely entirely on
achieving material success as mainstream society sees it?
Hilda played convincingly by Kaushalya Fernando represents the
typical, ambitious mother who desperately desires a 'better life' for
her children and determinedly pushes her eldest daughter, Priyangani,
brought to life endearingly by Geetha Alahakoon, to qualify and gain
entry to the medical faculty to become a doctor. Hilda as shown by her
actions and the criticisms at her by her own husband, played commendably
by Prasannajith Abeysuriya, is a quintessential player in the game of
'keeping up with the Joneses'.
Priyangani's predicament is not particular to her alone. The rich kid
Jagath, and Saranapala the poor village lad who gets a scholarship to
Royal College Colombo, but fails to reach the height of prosperity
everyone expected of him, are all hapless victims of the perceptions
society holds about what university education should serve as a 'self
serving purpose'.
Tuition marketplace
Some of the notable aspects of the creativity in the narrative craft
in this 'partly musical play', which is ripe with song and dance, can be
scenes like the 'tuition market place'. It very cheekily and wittily,
captures through rhythm the sound of singular 'labels' assigned to
education for the purpose of being marketplace products.
The musicality of it is striking and contains an element of tasteful
humour although made merely of words and is delivered in the simplicity
of a form where 'subject labels' alone are like song 'lyrics'.
Do people become artists by birth or by choice? I have often asked
that question from myself and this play nuances that question
strikingly. Priyangani and her friends are all inclined towards the
pleasures of the arts, but except for Sampath, played commendably by
Mayura Perera, whose mother is a dancing teacher, there is little
parental encouragement to pursue their heart's desire after finishing
schooling. Education should not be torture but enjoyable. However for
some, attending Medical College or studying engineering could be at the
cost of abandoning their heart's desire of engaging in the arts. In the
face of the 'prestige' and economic gain that professions like medicine
and engineering provide, what is the worth of an education in the arts
is a question that is assiduously highlighted in the play.
The scene where Priyangani, after being forced to retake the A/L exam
on her mother's insistence, is strapped to a regimental study schedule
and trapped in a state of mental anguish and battered by mounting exam
pressure, is shown being attacked by demonic personae symbolising the
A/L syllabi that wrecks her psychologically. This is a pivotal point to
understand the 'internal' disfiguration or deformation that takes place
in the artistically inclined carefree soul that is Priyangani, unbeknown
to the world outside.
The final outcome is a tragedy. I shall not do the disservice to the
theatregoer yet to watch this play, by stating the ending and the form
of the tragic finale. If you are a parent with fledglings who are yet to
spread their wings and discover their own aptitudes and talents, and if
you enjoy theatre and believe theatre can teach us something
reflectively of what we are as 'society', then, Vikurthi will offer you
food for thought. On the matter of the overall performance and
production, the acting was commendable from all the payers in general,
while the lighting deserves some special applause for being well
devised, managed and effective to symbolise the moments of derangement
in the students' psyches.
Vikurthi although a play from the 'last century' has much to offer
the parental generation of today on whether an unending cycle of
maniacal consumerist goals should be continued and engrained in each
succeeding generation of children. After all, the generation that was at
the threshold of adulthood at the time this play first came out is now
at the helm and parentally positioned to steer the future of their
children. |