Most issues amicably settled:
PORT CITY gathers steam
by Ranil Wijayapala
The controversial Colombo Port City project which sailed through
stormy waters, has finally reached a peaceful solution, with issues
being amicably resolved following many months of discussions between the
Sri Lankan government and the Chinese investor.

Nihal Rupasinghe |
Certain issues, however, regarding the project were still unclear to
the public. The Sunday Observer met veteran engineer Nihal Rupasinghe,
now the Secretary to the Ministry of Megapolis and Western Region
Development, the new client of the Port City project regarding the
present status of the project.
Q:Now the Colombo Port City project is under the purview of
the Ministry of Megapolis and Western Region and not under the Ports
Authority. How did this happen ?
A: After this government took office, the Colombo Port City
project was halted on the basis that proper approval had not been
obtained.
The Attorney General had said the Ports Authority did not have the
authority to sign agreements as it was not authorised to do anything
outside the port and the agreement that was signed become illegal.
The Urban Development Authority(UDA) was then contacted but it too
didn't have any authority to claim new land. Then the government decided
that the Ministry of Megapolis, as being the client as the UDA comes
under our purview.
The official client is now the Ministry of Megapolis. When land is
reclaimed, the UDA will take over the project under its purview.
Q:The government suspended the project, saying that it had not
followed proper procedure when obtaining approval for the project. Have
all the legal barriers been cleared regarding the project?
A: According to the law, permission to fill the sea can only
be given by the President. We are now getting approval to make it within
the legal framework .
Q:Have all the environmental issues been addressed now?
A: Some of them were not properly addressed under the previous
client - the Ports Authority. Issues such as sand mining and boulder
transportation were not addressed in the former Environmental Impact
Assessment(EIA) report. We did a thorough study regarding these issues.

Graphic: Wasantha |
We handed over the report to the Coast Conservation and Coastal
Resource Management Department(CCD), the approving agency for the
project.
The CCD after evaluating the report and calling for public views,
gave the required permission setting out 72 conditions. This is not
abnormal.
This procedures should be adopted during construction. The Beiral
Lake outfall also comes under the Port City and these issue too have to
be addressed. Engineering studies regarding the issue of the Beira Lake
outfall have also to be done.
Q:What is the next step ?
A: After obtaining the required environmental clearance from
the CCD,the Cabinet has appointed me as the Secretary to the Ministry of
Megapolis and Western Region and as the new client to authorise the
recommencement of the project.
The contract was earlier signed by the Ports Authority for six months
before it could be made valid. I issued a letter that they could
commence the project under these conditions.
Q:Have they started now?
A: The Chinese contractors have started the project. They have
not commenced in a big way. The 72 conditions laid out have to be
followed. We have to issue the licences.
Quarries for metals and boulders and sites for sand mining have been
identified. For deep sand mining, testing is being done in the deep
seas.
Q:But there were negotiations between the government and the
Chinese investor regarding the sharing of land and other related
matters. The public do not know anything about this?
A: The Government signed two agreements with the Chinese
investor. One is the development agreement and the other is the
concession agreement.
This is a commercial agreement and a claim of a 125 million US dollar
claim has been made for halting the project.
Compensation is claimed when the work is stopped. This is the extra
cost of mobilising machines, keeping the staff and loss of time. But we
said the contractor is also responsible for stopping work because they
are the contractors as well as the investor. They should be aware that
the approval was incomplete and should share the responsibility.
Q:Do you think that the Government has to pay compensation?
A: Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe also said the request
for compensation could be entertained. An amicable solution could be
reached soon without payment to the Chinese company.
Their lawyers will come to Sri Lanka in another two to three weeks
and we can achieve a favourable response.
Q:There is a perception that the 500 million Yuan grant
pledged by China to Sri Lanka is to cover that cost of compensation. Is
there any justification?
A: No. There is nothing like that. I think we can settle the
issue without making any compensation to the Chinese company.
Q:Is there a final agreement over the issue of sharing the
extent of reclaimed land between the government and the investor?
A: We have done the EIA for the extended land of 262 hectares.
On this issue also I think we can settle it amicably. Differences are
less now with both parties.
They want the agreement as it is. There was a proposal to reduce the
land extent.
But they did not like that. We are discussing the issue and can
amicably settle that as well.
Land given to them will be on 99-year lease and not on a free hold.
Earlier they claimed the land for commercial reasons. |