No-Confidence Motion come a cropper
Despite the 'drama' enacted by the Joint Opposition (JO) on the floor
of the House in moving a No Confidence Motion (NCM) against Finance
Minister Ravi Karunanayake, their attempt was finally in vain as the
Government legislators defeated the Motion with an overwhelming majority
of 94 votes. The JO members were keen to exert pressure on the
Government and make a big hue and cry, but the Government law-makers
defeated the Motion by clearly displaying their strength in Parliament.
Amidst speculation over the past couple of days, the UNP in
association with SLFP members in the Yahapalana rainbow coalition
thwarted the JO-sponsored NCM, the first such motion debated in
Parliament since the Government assumed office in August 2015. When 145
Government members voted against the Motion, the JO could muster only 51
votes. As a significant gesture, the JVP who played a leading role to
bring President Maithripala Sirisena to power and restore good
governance in the country also voted for the Motion while the 16 TNA MPs
were absent at the time of the vote. The notable absence of former
President and UPFA Kurunegala District MP Mahinda Rajapaksa, Ministers
Mangala Samaraweera, W.D.J. Seneviratne and several UPFA MPs could be
clearly witnessed during the vote.
The Government legislators who joined in the debate were critical of
the views expressed by the JO MPs. They alleged, instead of presenting
facts under the six charges in the NCM, the JO members were talking
about other issues which had no relevance to what was highlighted in the
Motion. Deputy Power and Energy Minister Ajith P. Perera pointed out
that none of the JO MPs ever spoke about a single allegation included in
the NCM. Being an economist, MP Bandula Gunawardena who moved the Motion
didn't utter a single word about the content of the Motion. Deputy
Minister Perera said charges against the Finance Minister, should have
been supported by clear evidence.
The previous day, Speaker Karu Jayasuriya had to adjourn the sittings
abruptly and postpone the debate on the NCM against Finance Minister
Ravi Karunanayake for the next day (June 9) following a technical hitch
in the microphone system of Parliament. It was the first time in Sri
Lanka's parliamentary history that such a mishap had occurred. When
Parliamentary sittings commenced on June 8 at 1.00 pm with the Speaker
presiding, around 1.33 pm the microphones stopped working and nothing
could be heard from the Chamber. The microphones stopped functioning
when Public Enterprises Development Minister Kabir Hashim got up to
respond to a question by Colombo District UNP parliamentarian S.M.
Marikkar. This led the government MPs to shout that they had been
deprived of their due facilities. They attempted to impress that there
was a conspiracy to switch off their microphones. Opposition MPs too,
shouted that their microphones were not functioning. Subsequently, both
Government and Opposition MPs came to the Well of the Chamber and
shouted that their privileges had been violated.
UPFA Colombo District MP Wimal Weerawansa was seen asking Finance
Minister Ravi Karunanayake whether he was afraid of the debate on the
NCM against him. Opposition MPs began to shout it was a plot hatched by
Minister Karunanayake and said he had spent money to get the officials
to harm the microphone system. Government MPs who responded to the
vociferous JO MPs, said had they plotted to prevent the debate, they
would not have indulged in such type of things. We have better options,
they said.
Minister Sarath Amunugama who joined the debate launched a scathing
attack on MP Bandula Gunawardena. He said the NCM provided an ideal
opportunity to the JO to show their ignorance, to the country. Citing a
series of progressive moves by the Government such as, increase of
public servant salaries, reducing the prices of fuel and increasing the
allowance to university students and elders, Minister Amunugama
questioned MP Gunawardena in lighter vein, whether they were opposed to
the relief measures given to the people and added, that is why they had
moved the NCM against the Finance Minister.
Winding up the debate, Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake said the
Joint Opposition front-liners, Mahinda Rajapaksa, Wimal Weerawansa and
Namal Rajapaksa had not even signed the Motion. The JO cannot tolerate
the clean and transparent government of President Maithripala Sirisena
and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. The Minister drew the attention
of the House to the failure on the part of former President Mahinda
Rajapaksa to come to Parliament to vote for the JO sponsored NCM.
Yet, another No Confidence Motion handed over to the Speaker by the
JO against the Secretary General of Parliament was not permitted to be
moved in Parliament as there was no reason to lose confidence in the
Secretary General. The NCM against the Secretary General of Parliament
that he should be removed from his post as he had failed to carry out
the decision on May 5, 2016 on the Supplementary Estimate vote, had been
handed over to the Speaker. However, the Speaker told the House on
Friday (June 10) that an oversight in the counting of votes in
Parliament had occurred, as in many other parts of the world. It was
wrong for some MPs to interpret the recent voting fiasco in Parliament
as unprecedented. Making a special announcement in Parliament, the
Speaker said that according to the Hansard there had been three earlier
occasions of mistakes in vote-counting in the Sri Lankan Parliament and
such errors had been rectified later. In the Parliament of Great Britain
there had been 11 instances of such miscounting. The Parliamentary
Affairs Committee met on Thursday (June 09) and took up the NCM
presented by a group of MPs against the Secretary General of Parliament.
The committee decided there was no need for further pursuance of the
matter, as there was no reason to lose confidence in the Secretary
General of Parliament.
|