Make a moral choice
The subject of ethics or moral science has been studied since the
time of the ancient Greek philosophers such as Socrates, Plato and
Aristotle. It has been influenced and shaped by the ideas of religious
teachers and philosophers. Thus the subject of ethics has evolved over
time. Although it has been refined by generations of thinkers and put
into shape, we seem to pay scant respect to it. For instance, ethics is
no longer a subject for the local General Certificate of Education
(Advanced Level) examination. No wonder, we see a lot of unethical
practices in the business world and in society as well.
In a society driven by crass consumerism, ethics is no longer a
popular subject. Kohlberg who has done an in-depth study of the
situation gives us a six-stage model of moral development. In his highly
acclaimed study, he suggests a hierarchy of ethics. A brief look at the
model will throw some light on the current situation which might be
changed with some effort. He believes that people can be taught to use
this model to help them develop their sense of ethics or morality.
In the six-stage model of moral development, the first two elements
are termed 'pre-conceived morality'. For instance, people obey orders
simply to avoid punishment. If there is no system of punishing offenders
by law enforcement authorities, there will be many crimes in society
leading to anarchy. Secondly, in a consumerist society people are driven
by a kind of marketplace morality. If you put it very simply, everybody
wants to maximize their pleasures and minimize their pains.
 |
Sir William Berkeley |
The next two elements in the six-stage model, 'Conventional morality'
plays a major role. Kohlberg sees groups of people follow group norms.
When people find themselves in a group, they try to behave well. For
instance, they will help an injured man lying on the road or protect
innocent children or women from unruly elements. But these group norms
are forgotten when each member is left alone. If he sees an injured man
lying on the road, he might look the other way and proceed on his
journey. If he is driven by desire, he will even pick somebody's pocket.
On the other hand, people generally focus their attention on preserving
the law and order in society. As a group they know that if there is a
breakdown in law and order, nobody will be safe.
Kohlberg names his third category as 'Post-conventional morality'.
Under this category he sees people who practise a kind of principled
morality. They pay their electricity and water bills on time. They never
hesitate to support the government by paying their income tax.
In fact, they are law-abiding citizens. Unfortunately, most people
progress up to this stage and do not proceed to the next phase known as
'Universal morality'. Some people, of course, go back to their early
stages without making any progress. Universal morality demands that you
should not torture your enemies or condemn them to death without giving
them a fair hearing. However, with terrorism raising its ugly head in
several countries, the question arises whether it is possible to
practise these lofty ideas. When a small group of people is hell-bent on
destroying the social fabric, law-abiding citizens and their elected
representatives have no time to waste listening to the explanations of
terrorists. As a result, universal morality is something difficult to
achieve in the modern context.
It seems that the market has no sense of ethics when it comes to
business dealings. If business people have some sense of ethics, we will
not hear of Sakvithi and Golden Key scams. However much you preach
morals, unscrupulous businessmen will resort to malpractices every now
and then. To arrest this trend, we need to have stringent laws and law
enforcement authorities who can be trusted to deliver the goods.
Insufficient regulations have seen the collapse of many business
organizations in the recent past. Therefore, an ethical framework should
evolve in society to prevent further unpleasant situations taking place
in the future.
As a general rule, moral reasoning improves with age. But this seems
to operate at individual level because even some elderly people are
involved in fraudulent activities in the financial sector. An individual
can, if he so desires, follow lectures, read books and become a moral
person. However, when it comes to groups of people, this does not
happen. They have to develop through their dynamic relationship with the
environment and other people. Another factor is that their ethics will
be influenced by the organization in which they work. For instance, if
the head of an organization is up to corruption, his employees will not
follow ethical rules. This acts like a virus which cannot be destroyed
easily.
Greed, fraud and corruption are regrettably very much alive in our
midst, more so in the corporate sector. Just like people, even business
organizations can be at different stages of ethical development.
The renowned Irish philosopher Sir William Berkeley once said, "At
heart ethics consists in striking the right balance between two basic
human feelings: Concern for one's self and concern for others." We must
not forget that even in business, sincerity, honesty, truthfulness and
keeping your promises are still valid. That means ethics is good for
individuals and business organizations as well.
In Plato's Republic there is a debate about the function of rules
within society. If everyone acts from selfish motives, then all will end
up suffering in some way, exploited by others. Therefore, conventional
rules imposed by society are a way of protecting everyone from the basic
selfish desires of everyone else.
According to Plato, all elements in society need to work together for
the general health of the whole. He says that justice offers the
happiest life, because it is the expression of health. On the other
hand, injustice is a sickness.
Whether it is your personal or corporate life, you have to make a
moral choice. Are you going to accumulate wealth through unjust
enrichment, or are you ready to listen to your conscience and make
ethical decisions? As the renowned German philosopher Immanuel Kant
said, if you are in a dilemma, follow your conscience.
|