Film Review:
'Vidu' marks complete volte-face in style
Thulasi MUTTULINGAM
Asoka Handagama's latest venture in filmdom might surprise many. It's
dubbed a 'children's film'.
His target audience in the past have hardly been children. Although
dubbed a children's film, the latest release Vidu is not the typical fun
and frolic genre of film in the 'Home Alone' model. Far from it, in
fact.
The main protagonist of the movie is a young boy called Vidu. He is
very intelligent and aspires to learn but his mother is unable to enroll
him in a good school. She is a prostitute who has had Vidu out of
wedlock and the boy's lack of a birth certificate as well as a paternal
figure, marks him at a distinct disadvantage.
However, his mother has coached him at home to read and write and his
English skills are better than his contemporaries who study at school;
he has picked up the language by speaking to tourists on the beach.
Street smart and worldly wise for his age, he is able to fend for
himself whenever life throws him a curve but there is also a poignancy
about him; he senses that he has been given a raw deal in life and
watching his beloved mother, with whom he shares a close bond, struggle
to make ends meet in whichever way it takes and humiliated in the
process, causes him much pain.
The plot revolves around the boy, his mother and a politician
(possibly the boy's father) who seeks to exploit the boy's oratorical
skills to his own advantage.
How much children will identify with this children's film remains to
be seen. Although a departure from his usual style, it still has
elements that children would not or should not, ideally understand. Not
unless they, like Vidu have been unfortunate enough to be exposed to the
harsh realities of a poverty stricken life from a young age and have had
to grow up beyond their years.
It is not a happy and uplifting children's tale with a 'Happily Ever
After', although it does end on an upbeat note.
The movie could be called poignant at best. The boy who plays the
character of Vidu certainly does an excellent job; for so young a child,
he seems to have understood his character very well and acquits himself
as a very, talented actor.
The only times when he goes slightly off is when he is required to
speak in English (although this is possibly more an oversight of the
director than any fault of the child's).
The scenes require the child to be fluent in English because he has
picked it up from foreign holiday makers at the beach. Unfortunately,
his diction sounds rehearsed and strained rather than easy and fluent.
However, he performs excellently in the crux of the movie when he
steals a microphone laid out for a political rally and addresses the
public at large, perched high up on a tree, where he seems to have
retired to hide himself.
He is supposed to show himself as a very good orator and he plays the
part excellently. That said, it must be noted that the movie, though it
addresses problems in society, doesn't seem to have a coherent message.
What exactly it is that Homagama wants to portray is open to question.
The characters haven't been sufficiently developed and display some
contradictory facets to their natures. The movie also doesn't lead to
anything ultimately concrete or coherent.
It is worth a watch, if only for the acting talent of the two young
boys in it, but one could wish that the storyline was a little more
concrete and engaging.
|