DIALOG sees Sri Lanka’s cricket future today
When corporate giants display leadership by helping to promote sport
at the national level, it provides a huge boost to the particular sport
that is being sponsored. And so it is for Sri Lanka Cricket where the
giant mobile company Dialog Axiata PLC has been magnanimous in in its
sponsorship. Since padding up to serve sport, Dialog has met with
resounding success in that it sees Sri Lanka’s
cricket’ future today’ echoing the company’s tag line the Future
Today!
Realising the value that could accrue to the company, Dialog stepped
into sports sponsorship with a rare passion. And if the company was
looking for a Return on Investment, then it can draw ample satisfaction
from the fact that sports from cricket to rugby improved and it did not
take long to hit the big time.
Fortunate to have two great sports promoters in Dr. Hans Wijesuriya
as Chairman and Amalie Nanayakkara as Group Chief Marketing Officer,
Dialog’s sponsorship has enabled sport to attain new heights and more
importantly breathe new life into the sport the promotion of which were
being hampered by lack of strong sponsorship.
Cricket - number one sport Dialog gave cricket the number one sport
in the country a great fillip when they took over the sponsorship of the
national team for a mind boggling sum and now made cricket their own by
agreeing to sponsor the annual cricket awards show.
Not only cricket, Dialog is quick to spot sports that deserve
sponsorship and have over the years sponsored athletics, wheel chair
athletics, rugby and also the primarily poor man’s sport football.
With the cricketers and ruggerites delivering, Dialog have got the
mileage they were looking for and with more sponsorship these two sports
will soon hit big time which will do the country proud.
ASHES leaves much heartburn
Since the beginning of the ASHES cricket series between the two
cricketing giants in the world – Australia and England never has a
series left so much heart burn, controversy and ill feeling as the one
that was just completed in England.
True, the bodyline series in 1931 with Australia who were at the
receiving end of Harold Larwood’s stingers accusing England of not
playing the game which nearly ended the cricketing ties between the two
countries.
But thanks to the cricketing gods, saner counsel prevailed and the
Ashes series continued and still continues with the game being played
with no quarter asked or given. It was no different with the ASHES
series just concluded.
But never before has the Ashes series left a bad taste in the mouth
like the one that was just concluded. The pot was boiling over with
controversy, ill feeling, allegations and accusations, poor umpiring and
cheating allegations.
Winning at all costs that matters
Obviously all these ill feelings, apparently stems from the fact that
in the context of the game today, it is the winning at all costs that
matters, with the time honoured and sacred axiom – that it is not the
winning or the losing that matters but how one played the game – being
hit out the grounds.
The ASHES series is the ‘mother of all battles’ in the game. There
was much hype before the series began, with Australia and England
promising to go for each other’s jugular which built the series into a
crescendo.
England were the holders of the Ashes having comfortably beaten
Australia in their own den and being the holders they were expected to
stuff the Aussies and hug the Ashes urn.England did hug the urn beating
the Australians 3-nil in the Five Test series winning the First, Second
and Fourth Test with the Third and the Final Test being washed out by
rain.
England was the better side
That England was the better side there was no doubt. In addition they
had the conditions and the wickets in their favour and were expected to
win without having to raise much sweat and above all not having to
resort to tactics that were not cricket.But some of their tactics were
inexplicable , especially that of all rounder Stuart Broad who refused
to walk when, it was obvious to everyone that he had nicked a catch to
Michael Clarke in the slips off a rebound from wicketkeeper Brad
Haddin’s gloves.The Aussies had exhausted their referrals and they swear
that had Broad walked, they would have won the First Test which they
lost by just 14 runs and which victory would have given them the
momentum to fire all cylinders in the remaining Tests and probably
regain the mythical Ashes.
Australian coach Darren Lehmann belatedly took Broad to task for his
unsportsmanship, calling on the Aussie spectators to give Broad the
‘works’ when he tours Australia in December for another round of Ashes
series.
Lehmann slapped 20 per cent fine
Lehmann’s comments warranted that he be slapped a fine of 20 per cent
of his match fee for his outburst. Former stormy petrel of Australian
cricket and captain of the successful teams of the 1970s Ian Chappell
felt the urge to pitch into Lehmann for his remarks and call him a
hypocrite.
Chappell said Australians, who’ve traditionally always waited for the
umpire’s decision, were in no position to complain about opponents who
did exactly the same thing. ‘I don’t like to be called a cheat and
basically he (Lehmann) is calling all people who don’t walk a cheat,
which would include himself’, Chappell had told BBC Radio Five.‘Cheat is
not a word you should use very light-heartedly, and even if you are
being light-hearted that’s a word you should steer away from’ added
Chappell. Chappell it must be admitted was a captain marvel, leading
with success and in the manner born.Incidentally Chappell was arguably
the best player of spin bowling that Australia had produced. Seeing the
present crop of Australian batsmen especially left handers such as Phil
Hughes, Usman Khawaja and Chris Rodgers and Michael Clarke and Shane
Watson falling easy prey to off spinner Graeme Swann, had Chappell been
there he would have hammered the daylights out of Swann.
Ian Chappell best player of spin
Chappell a dashing right hand batsman made former West Indian off
spinner Lance Gibbs look ordinary in the series in the 1970s. He was a
firm believer that spin bowling is best played using the feet and
getting down to the pitch of the ball and not treating it manacled to
the crease.
Incidentally it would also be of interest to readers to know that
Chappell is not one who advocates ‘walking’ after having snicked a
catch. In the 1970s during a series against the West Indies, he tickled
a delivery from Michael Holding to the wicket keeper and stood his
ground.Holding who was quite young and making his first tour ‘down
under’ stood in bewilderment when the umpire turned down the appeal and
Chappell quite nonchalantly stayed put. Holding went on his knees
imploring the umpire to give Chappell out, but to no avail.
So it will be seen Chappell has not forgotten that incident and so
his taking to task Lehmann for taking to task Broad for not ‘walking’
which action by Broad deprived Australia of victory in the First Test.
Aussies looking for consolation win
Back to the Ashes, and like the Third Test the rains came down to
spoil the final Test at the Kia Oval in London. In an attempt for a
consolation win, Clarke made a bold declaration on the final day setting
England 227 to win in 44 overs.
England who had already pocketed the urn, made a bold bid for
victory.
But with 21 required off 24 balls and with five wickets in the Bank,
umpires decided that the light was bad even with the floodlights on and
called off the match.Also during the series one noticed the preparation
of wickets to suit the home team bowlers, especially off spinner Graeme
Swann. From the first morning Swann was able to get enormous spin.The
Aussie batsmen have over the years shown a distinct weakness against off
spin. A case in point was the devastation caused by Jim Laker in the mid
fifties when he had the Aussie batsmen in a flat spin claiming 19
wickets in a Test.Although there is an unwritten law, home curators are
known to make wickets to suit the home tram bowlers. It happens in all
countries and it was no different even in Sri Lanka.
[email protected]
|