David Hicks pleads guilty at Guantanamo

Australian David Hicks is seen in this family handout photo taken
Dec. 13, 2001. Australia's foreign minister said Tuesday, March 27,
2007 he expected an Australian Taliban fighter would return home
soon to serve a prison sentence after he pleaded guilty at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to a terrorism offense.
-AP
|
Australian David Hicks pleaded guilty Monday to material support of
terrorism, securing a symbolic victory for the Bush administration in
the first war crimes trial since World War II.
After a day of legal wrangling in which two of Hicks' three defense
lawyers were barred from representing him, the 31-year-old Muslim
convert and soldier of fortune told the military judge in a specially
reconvened night session that he had aided a terrorist group.
Bedraggled and appearing irritated, Hicks showed little emotion at
the prospect of potentially leaving Guantanamo Bay after more than five
years in military detention. Under an agreement between Washington and
the Australian government, Hicks would be allowed to serve any sentence
in an Australian prison.
The tribunal's presiding officer, Marine Col. Ralph H. Kohlmann, is
expected to hear the details of what Hicks has admitted to this
afternoon, and the 10-member military commission could gather by the end
of the week to determine a sentence, said spokeswoman Maj. Beth Kubala.
The tribunal is formally known as a commission. Hicks was captured in
December 2001 by Afghanistan's Northern Alliance fighters while
attempting to flee the country in a taxi.
He was turned over to U.S. forces and flown to Guantanamo Bay in
January 2002.He faced allegations of using a gun to guard a Taliban
tank, conducting surveillance of the empty U.S. Embassy in Kabul,
attending Al Qaeda training camps and fighting American forces in
Afghanistan.
Although she proclaimed herself a neutral party in the Pentagon's
newly reconstituted war crimes process, Kubala said Monday's proceedings
demonstrated that "this is a process that is transparent, legitimate and
moving forward."
Hicks was the first detainee to be prosecuted among the nearly 800
men who have been brought here as so-called enemy combatants since
January 2002, and the only one charged formally with a war crime. He
also was one of 10 suspects charged under tribunals enacted by President
Bush in November 2001 that were deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme
Court nine months ago. About 385 detainees remain in the Guantanamo Bay
prison.
Under the evolving rules of the Military Commissions Act passed by
Congress in September, the defense and prosecution can cut a plea
bargain, as in a civilian court, and recommend a negotiated sentence to
the tribunal members, who act as judge and jury in meting out
punishment.
Hicks changed his mind about entering a plea after more than four
hours of pretrial procedures in which his main defense lawyer, Marine
Maj. Michael Mori, was unable to persuade Kohlmann that he needed more
time to prepare.
Mori was left alone at the defense table with the defendant when
civilian criminal defense lawyer Joshua Dratel was barred from
participating because he refused to promise to adhere to procedural
rules that had yet to be defined."
I can't sign a document that provides a blank check on my ethical
obligations," Dratel told Kohlmann, saying his obligation was to his
client, not to the military process. "You can't make it an
all-or-nothing proposition. I can't buy a pig in a poke." Kohlmann also
declined to approve a second civilian lawyer, Rebecca Snyder, on the
grounds that commission rules allowed civilians only if their
representation incurred no expense to the U.S. government. Snyder is a
Pentagon employee.
Legal analysts were critical of the opening day of the reconstituted
war crimes tribunal." These trials are the United States' chance to
restore its moral authority and reputation as a leading proponent of the
rule of law.
Instead, today's antics highlighted the illegitimacy of a hastily
crafted process without established precedent or established rules,"
said Jennifer Daskal, a lawyer observing the commissions for Human
Rights Watch.
"It appears that Mr. Hicks was strong-armed into pleading guilty
after two of his counsel were thrown off the case." Kohlmann had
adjourned the arraignment hearing, in which Hicks chose to put off
entering a plea until other preliminary matters were decided.
But the presiding officer called the tribunal back to order at 8:25
p.m., and Hicks pleaded guilty to the part of the charge accusing him of
supporting a terrorist organization, though he denied committing any
specific violent act.
The split plea was probably negotiated with the government to justify
a lighter sentence than the 20-year term the chief prosecutor had hinted
would be in order if Hicks were tried and found guilty.
The charge can carry a life term, but the prosecutor, Air Force Col.
Morris Davis, had said Sunday that he doubted a conviction would warrant
the maximum sentence. Davis said the prosecution would take into
consideration that Hicks' plea spared the government weeks of testimony
and presentation of evidence.
Hicks, dressed in tan prison garb, stunned his family and court
spectators with his initial appearance: He was scruffy, wore his hair
halfway down his back and had gained at least 30 pounds since he was
last seen at a Guantanamo Bay proceeding in November 2004.
Terry Hicks, the defendant's father, said his son told him during an
emotional morning reunion in a court anteroom that he didn't trust the
U.S. military forum to live up to a pledge by the Bush administration to
transfer Hicks to Australian custody at the end of the proceedings."
Will they allow him to go home?" Terry Hicks asked with skepticism.
"They've held him for five years. Who would you trust who held you for
five years!"
In Australia, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer told the Associated
Press today that the government expected Hicks to be returned to
Australia soon under the agreement with Washington.
Terry Hicks and the defendant's sister, Stephanie, were boarding a
State Department plane for a trip back to Washington when tribunal
officials learned of the decision to enter a plea.
The two were given an opportunity to return to the courtroom across
Guantanamo Bay from the airstrip but declined, a senior military
official here confirmed on the condition that he not be identified.
Kohlmann asked Hicks whether his exclusion of Dratel and Snyder had
influenced his decision to plead guilty. Hicks said it had not. Lawyers
were prohibited by tribunal authorities to discuss more about the plea
deal than was revealed in court.
Hicks' protracted stay in U.S. custody ? he was among the first
Guantanamo Bay prisoners to arrive ? has become an issue in Australia,
where Prime Minister John Howard's Liberal Party faces a tough
reelection campaign this year."
There's no reason for this to happen except that political
considerations are driving the schedule," said Ben Wizner, a lawyer for
the American Civil Liberties Union. "Every time, these proceedings
reveal themselves to be political and not legal."
The Pentagon set a 30-day deadline for arraigning Hicks when it
charged him March 1, just after Vice President Dick Cheney visited
Australia and was urged by Howard to dispense with further delays
Agencies
|