Rising military expenditure spiking world poverty
Not surprisingly, world military spending is not only on the upswing
but is being led by the US. According to Stockholm International Peace
Research Institute (SIPRI) findings, such spending has spiked by 37
percent over the past 10 years. Today global military expenditure stands
at an unsettling 1.2 trillion dollars, making the world seem a very
dangerous place to live in.
The continuing 'war on terror' has, no doubt, enabled the US to
remain at the top of this spending league, accounting for 46 percent of
military spending last year and for 62 per cent of the total increase.
The US was followed by Britain, France, China and Japan, each accounting
for four to five percent of the expenditure. What is particularly
revelatory is that the top 15 countries account for 83 percent of the
expenditure. The close bearing military expenditure has on national
power is thus established.
The most thought-provoking SIPRI finding, however, is that rising
military spending of states has gone hand-in-hand with growing national
affluence and wealth. China is a case in point. While Chinese military
spending outstripped that of Japan for the first time last year, it "is
the prime example of a country where a booming economy, amongst other
factors, has allowed a steep rise in military expenditure," the SIPRI
report said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00017/00017ababcbc33fda6becc0944523ba3f8948975" alt=""
The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) Robert S.
Mueller speaks to attendees of the International Conference on
Combatting Nuclear Terrorism in Miami, Florida 11 June 2007. AFP |
The case of China is of particular salience because it has always
identified itself with the Third World and has espoused the most vital
causes of the latter.
China's budgetary outlay for social spending is not known to this
writer but the chances are that the more a state is committed to
expanding its military budget, the less financial resources there would
be for social welfare. This is certainly true of many Third World
countries which are intent on bolstering their military spending.
Poverty has increased in direct proportion to war expenditure, for
instance.
Even the US could be guilty of this distorted sense of priorities.
The world is now told that New Orleans is still to recover substantially
from the ravages left behind by Hurricane Catrina a couple of years ago.
Apparently, social spending is not reaching the desired levels in all
parts of even the US, but its military expenditure is continuing to
soar.
The finding that emerges is that social concerns would take second
place to national power and security considerations, which are the sole
preoccupation of states whether they be powerful or powerless. In South
Asia, amid burgeoning military budgets one finds vast populations sunk
in poverty. It must be remembered that both, India and Pakistan are
nuclear-powered.
The disquieting point is that this frenzy for military power would
only grow relentlessly. It would grow in tandem with new threat
perceptions emerging mainly among the world's rich and powerful. Take,
for instance, the alarm triggered at the recent international conference
in the US on a perceived "global terrorist nuke threat." At the
conference held under the aegis of the Global Initiative to Combat
Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT), there was a near consensus on US FBI director
Robert Mueller's pronouncement that "nuclear terrorism is a global
threat that requires a global response."
It was widely believed that the power of the West would be at stake
if terror outfits, such as the Alqaeda, availed of the "international
nuclear technology black market" and went in for "weapons of mass
destruction."
What all this means is that the military spending of particularly the
West would only spiral in the days ahead in response to these threat
perceptions, increasingly imperilling the future of the world and
plunging more and more humans into the poverty trap.
[email protected]
|