Thoppigala -the new symbol of national pride
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/569d6/569d665b8b1000883b6224e745ea6bcfeec52be8" alt="By H. L. D. Mahindapala"
First crack
If the year 2004 was bad for Velupillai Prabhakaran then the year
2005 was worse. The first crack in the seemingly indivisible monolith of
the LTTE appeared in April 2004 when Karuna, his most able commander,
broke away asserting his own regional rights in the east.
There were other factors like personal rivalries as well that made
them lock horns. But the underlying factor of regional differences
between the northern and eastern Tamils surfaced once again to divide
the Tamil separatists.
To create the political fiction of a pan-Tamil movement, stretching
like a single unbroken thread from Mannar in the western coast to Kumana
in the eastern coast, the eastern Tamils were recruited hastily and
opportunistically in the 50s and 60s by the vellahla leadership of
Jaffna with offers of some senior positions in the federalist/separatist
party. However, it was a movement that never consolidated itself into a
rock-solid front of all Tamil-speaking peoples in all regions.
To begin with, the Jaffna Tamils referred to the eastern Tamils as "Batticaloa
Tamils" - a label that immediately reduced the status of the "Batticaloa
Tamils" below that of the so-called superior "Jaffna Tamils". But the
vellahla elite needed the "Batticaloa Tamils" (and anybody who spoke
Tamils, including the estate Tamils and the Muslims of the east) to
serve their over-ambitious separatist goals by manipulating mono-ethnic
extremism, or better still, Jaffna jingoism.
The vellahla elite went all out to woo the Batticaloa Tamils by
throwing some scraps from their table to the lesser Tamil-speaking folk
from the east. Prabhakaran too beefed up his dwindling cadres with
Batticaloa Tamils who were treated as equals in sharing the anti-Sinhala
ideology but not in sharing positions in the Tiger hierarchy. Though he
was not a vellahla he handpicked only the Jaffna-based cadres whom he
could trust to key positions in his politico-military outfit. The
tendency of the separatist movement, whether in the hands of the
vellahalas, or the low-caste Tigers, was for the Jaffna-oriented
leadership to dominate with other Tamil regionalists playing a secondary
role. Consequently, the regional, economic, cultural and caste
difference failed to hold them together cohesively for long as one
community sharing one political destiny. The vellahlas of the north and
the mukkuvars of the east did not see eye to eye on many competing
issues.
Colonialism sharpened their differences. For instance, the vellahla
Jaffna Tamils dominated the government service and the professional
class with high political ambitions of creating a separate state with,
of course, the vellahla elite sitting on top of all other Tamil-speaking
people. The Batticaloa Tamils, however, were more from the agricultural
and fishing communities and their political orientation and ambitions
were neither directed nor congruent with the mono-ethnic extremism of
the politically driven Jaffna Tamils. Invariably, the Batticaloa Tamils
were recruited as aides by the Jaffna Tamils to serve their political
ambitions and goals.
These are some of the factors that combined to push Karuna out of
Prabhakaran's grip. When Karuna began to feel the heat of the northern
hegemony he complained loudly and quit crying discrimination. Much noise
was made then claiming that this split would be the end of Prabhakaran.
It didn't. Despite Karuna's blow, Prabhakaran was sitting pretty in
total control of the political bases in the north and east left intact,
thanks to the guarantees of borders underwritten by Ranil Wickremesinghe
in his disastrous Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) (2002). In fact, Prabhakaran
used the CFA to demand the disarming of Karuna. As for Karuna, he was
hoping to build his own base in the east but he did not have the
wherewithal to build a formidable base, let alone survive in the east.
Cruellest cut
In reality, Karuna's situation became precarious after President
Chandrika Kumaratunga accused Wickremesinghe of selling the nation and
dismissed him from three key ministries. The nation was hoping that she
would reverse Wickremesinghe's policies. But she did nothing of the
sort. The most pragmatic option was to exploit the divisions within the
LTTE to strengthen the Sri Lankan forces and to reclaim the arbitrary
and illegal hand over of land to Prabhakaran in the CFA. Instead, she
ignored military reports detailing the Tamil Tiger incursions into the
strategic bases in the east, particularly the areas guarding the mouth
of the Trincomalee harbour and turned a blind eye to the Tiger land
grab. The cruellest cut, in the fashion of "et tu Brute", came when she
joined hands with the Tigers and opened the passage across Verugal river
for the Tigers to attack Karuna's cadres from the rear, forcing Karuna
to retreat and even disband his cadres.
So both Wickremesinghe and Kumaratunga jointly and severally aided
and abetted Prabhakaran to consolidate his positiond in the north and
the east and to minimise the impact of Karuna's breakaway. Apart from
the initial shock of the sudden break up of what seemed to be the
unbreakable monolith it had no direct bearing on Prabhakaran's grip on
the territories granted to him by Kumaratunga and Wickremesinghe.
Clearly, the political equation in the north and the east did not
alter one whit even after Karuna broke away because Prabhakaran was
sustained by the military and the political backing of Kumaratunga and
Wickremesinghe - the two key appeasers of Prabhakaran. Though
Kumaratunga protested loudly about not being consulted in the granting
of power and land to Prabhakaran under the CFA, it was a secret
fulfilment of her earlier dream, as she told TIME magazine, to hand over
the rule of the north and the east for ten years to Prabhakaran .
Karuna at this stage was almost helpless and looking for a way out.
The real impact of his breakaway that made a marked difference in
national politics came later under the leadership of Mahinda Rajapaksa.
(More of it later). The initial impact was more ideological.
First, he dealt an irreparable blow to the fictitious claim of
Prabhakaran to be 'the sole representative of all Tamils" and to the
myth that he is the "liberator" of the Tamils.
Second, the pan-Tamil movement, which never took off even under S. J.
V. Chelvanayakam, was buried once and for all by Karuna who resented
domination by the northern Tamils.
Third, the Tamil propagandists and their NGO fellow-travellers were
stunned by Karuna's accusations of discrimination not against their
common enemy, "the Sinhala-dominated government" but against "the Jaffna-dominated"
LTTE. It was ironical for the Jaffna-dominated Tigers who thrived on
claims of discrimination by the Sinhalese to be accused of
discriminating against their own Tamil people.
Intellectual hypocrites
With this accusation Karuna exposed the hypocrisy of the Jaffna
vellahla elite who were guilty of the horripilating crimes of
oppression, repression and discrimination of their own hapless low-caste
- almost 48 per cent of the Jaffna . This arrogant caste elite covered
up the crimes of their Tamil leaders by diverting their politicised
research on the Sinhala-Buddhist society. Neelan Tiruchelvam, Radhika
Coomaraswamy, Prof. S.J. Tambiah, Poi-kiyana-sothy Saravanamuttu, to
mention only a few, belong to this category of intellectual hypocrites
who never dared to look inside the cadjan curtain because it would
undermine the rationale of their successful political campaign which
projected the Tamils as the "victims" of Sinhala-Buddhist
discrimination. They too were reluctant to abandon Prabhakaran - the
prime source that generates foreign funds for NGOs - and did not put in
a good word for Karuna. To abandon Prabhakaran was to kill the goose
that laid the golden eggs.
So Prabhakaran continued to ride high and in terms of the physical
impact - or in terms of hurting where it hurt most - it was not Karuna
who did the damage. It was the tsunami of December 2004 that disjointed
Prabhakaran. Nature came down in all its fury on the naval and military
bases of Prabhakaran as if to remind Wickremesinghe and Kumaratunga that
if they were not prepared to do their duty there are others who will.
But defying the forces rising against him Prabhakaran decided to go
down the elusive path Evil-lam undeterred. Used to his ritual killings
("a pathological killer", Prof. James Jupp, ANU), most of which were
videoed or photographed for him to view at leisure in his Vanni hideout,
he feels it a blow to his ego and political status if he stops killings.
Nor was he capable of grasping the new realities closing in on him. In
hindsight, it is clear that he was heading for disaster.
The biggest blow came in 2005 when he voted to destroy his own
future. After taking everything he could get from Wickremesinghe he
cynically dismissed him by ordering the Tamils held in his open prison
not to vote in the Presidential election of 2005. It is, of course, the
greatest service he had ever rendered to save the forces he had been
fighting all along. It was suicidal from his point of view though at the
time he believed that it was a master stroke to fix the politics of the
south.
There is no doubt that Wickremesinghe deserved the mulish kick he got
from Prabhakaran. But this single fatal act isolated Prabhakaran
politically, diplomatically and militarily. He had already torn to
shreds the international contract that elevated him to the status of a
supreme commander of all what he surveyed in the north and the east. His
last remaining hope was in Wickremesinghe and Kumaratunga.
Despite all his bravado, a scrutiny of events will establish that
Prabhakaran was invariably saved by the Sinhala leadership - from
Premadasa to Wickremesinghe. But, for reasons best known to him. He
decided to send his two best backers in the south into the political
wilderness. It was a monumental miscalculation. But he hadn't yet begun
to slide down the greasy pole.
In the meantime, in London the most able salesman of Tamil atrocities
and Tamils killings Tamils, Anton Balasingham, was failing in health. He
was on his last legs. He used the standard theories available in the
ideological market to justify Tamil violence, particularly the
brutalities of Prabhakaran. All Tamil violence were justified as a part
of the "liberation struggle" and, therefore, valid as against the
violence of "the Sinhala-dominated government of Sri Lanka ". Of course,
he never lived to answer the question whether Karuna could use the same
slogan to "liberate" the eastern Tamils from the domination of the
northern Tamils. Though well read his theoretical underpinnings were
running out of validity with the escalating crimes against humanity and
war crimes committed by his leader, Prabhakaran.
Prabhakaran's isolation
In his last days Balasingham, however, may have had a glimpse of what
was coming. He lived to see the devastating impact of his own arguments
being rejected out of hand by the international community by turning the
screws on the Tiger diaspora. At the negotiating table he was lording it
over, with the blessings of his boozing buddy, Erik Solheim, on the
assumption that they had parity of status with the Sri Lankan government
based on "military balance". He lived just long enough to witness the
battle of Mavil Aru (August 2, 2006) firing at his contentious "military
balance" and blowing it to smithereens. But by December 14, 2006 he
passed away leaving a gap in the international politics of the Tigers.
His absence and silence fitted the new political climate, realities and
the needs because everything he worked for was coming apart. His death
completed Prabhakaran's isolation. "Bala Anna" was not there anymore to
spin yarns to cover up "Thamby's" colossal sins.
In their heyday, Prabhakaran and Balasingham were able to strut the
international stage, with diplomats queuing up at his door in Vanni,
because of the refusal of Wickremesinghe and Kumaratunga to confront
Prabhakaran and expose his hollow claims of being militarily invincible.
Wickremesinghe-Kumaratunga negotiations were based on the assumption
that their national forces did not have the capacity to fight and win.
Paralysed by the failures of the past they feared to risk a face-to-face
confrontation with Prabhakaran, thus reinforcing the myth of a military
giant who must be appeased. Peace negotiations which only moved in the
direction of surrender never brought hope to the war-weary Sri Lankans
or strength and stability to the Wickremesinghe-Kumaratunga duo who were
competing with each other to appease their Sun God, Prabhakaran.
Though this duo was lending their hand to Prabhakaran, Prabhakaran
was not helping himself. In a perverse way, he was bent on inflicting
wounds to his body politic - all of which were beginning to take its
toll by 2006. He had fire power but obfuscated by obsessive megalomania,
he lost the brain power to turn the events that came his way to his
advantage.
Throughout his career he had risen to considerable heights by hitting
indiscriminately in all directions.
Violence constituted the be-all and end-all of his politics. But by
2006 he had come to the end of the line of his violent politics. He had
to change tack but there was no one to tell him that his day has come
and there is no future in violence.
It is in this frame of mind that Prabhakaran prepared to face the
presidential elections of November 2005.
His calculation was to defeat pro-Western Wickremesinghe, acceptable
to the international community, and replace him with his rival, Mahinda
Rajapaksa, who Prabhakaran thought, would be rejected by the West for
his anti-Western, pro-nationalist approach. The media too was projecting
Mahinda Rajapaksa as "a hardliner" and a pro-Sinhala-Buddhist
"chauvinist". With such adverse factors stacked against Mahinda
Rajapaksa it was assumed that Prabhakaran would have a cake walk to his
next stage of winning Eelam.
In other words, Prabhakaran chose his own opponent in the next rounds
of confrontations - and it was fateful. Not only did he pick Mahinda
Rajapaksa he was pushing him, needling him, provoking him from the word
go, testing his mettle. Rajapaksa, who was feeling his way around,
reacted cautiously.
Light at end of tunnel
Wickremesinghe-Kumaratunga duo was waiting in the wings hoping that
Rajapaksa would fail, opening the way for them to recapture their lost
power. Neither Prabhakaran nor the Wickremesinghe-Kumaratunga
combination was ready to accept the will, the skill and thrills of what
came in the wake of the new Commander-in-Chief, Mahinda Rajapaksa, who
changed the political map with a finality that is beginning to show the
light at the end of the dark tunnel.
It began with Mavil Aru and the BBC announced that the Tigers
occupied the high ground and the advancing forces would be sitting ducks
for the Tiger marksmen.
The diplomatic community was not fully convinced either. Sucked in by
superior Tamil propaganda they were expecting the Tigers to give a
bloody nose to the Security Forces which would then force the Sri Lankan
government to return to the negotiating table. Hardly anyone (except, of
course, the courageous and heroic forces) expected the army to move
swiftly down from Mavil Aru to Thoppigala within weeks and clear the
east.
When that victorious day dawned President Mahinda Rajapaksa was not
the only proud Sri Lankan sitting on top of Thoppigala. The whole nation
was sitting with him dancing for joy. Thoppigala was like the fabled
pinhead on which millions of angels dance simultaneously for their own
happiness and glory.
Despite its detractors, Thoppigala will rise above all modern icons
and shine, in the Mahavamsa tradition, as the undying symbol of the
indomitable spirit of a nation that stood on its own two feet and
fought, against all foreign and local enemies, with courage and heroism
to lift a fallen nation from the ashes to new heights of pride and
dignity.
To all those self-sacrificing soldiers, sailors and airmen, who put
their lives on the line without squabbling for spoils of power and
prestige, I raise my cap off, from across the other side of the Indian
Ocean and say: "Ye gods look down/And from thy sacred vials pour thy
graces" upon these noble sons and daughters of Sri Lankan soil.
To be continued... |