Grim prospects for asylum-seekers
By Dhaneshi YATAWARA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/127b8/127b8771c217e042a7b45e3c59b32a768f633cf2" alt=""
A ferry transporting asylum seekers |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f62a3/f62a3d360207d760ff849a630ff013cb7e7c1fd7" alt=""
A group of refugees |
Last Friday 26 Sri Lankan asylum-seekers arrived at the Bandaranaike
International Airport after being deported by the United Kingdom.
Certain agency reports said some of them had links with the LTTE. The UK
Government’s decision to deport then to Sri Lanka was heavily resisted
by numerous west-based human rights watchmen although two-years have
already passed since the end of the three decade long terrorism. Though
this is supposedly the first time Sri Lankan asylum-seekers were
returned to Sri Lanka this may not be the last too.
On June 14, news reports from Ottawa, said that the Canadian
Government is poised to re-introduce anti human-smuggling legislation
that would include measures to punish asylum-seekers who pay smugglers
to take them into Canada. The news came into limelight with the arrest
of four men in Toronto by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in
connection with the MV Ocean Lady, the freighter that brought 76 illegal
immigrants to Canada’s West Coast over an year-and-a-half ago. The
arrests are the first stemming from RCMP investigations into human
smuggling networks in Southeast Asia that have brought hundreds of Sri
Lankan refuge seekers to Canada, aboard two freighters.
A second ship, the MV Sun Sea with nearly 500 passengers, arrived on
the shores of British Columbia last August and prompted the Canadian
government to table human-smuggling legislation two months later. The
bill went nowhere in the House of Commons because opposition parties
rejected some of its proposals. According to Canadian news reports, the
Canadian government’s intention is to send a warning to people hiring
human smugglers and letting them know that if they arrived in Canada it
would not be possible to immediately sponsor family members to join them
as part of a reunification program.
With the social and economic turbulence that erupted due to the rise
of the LTTE atrocities, many Tamil people flew abroad seeking asylum or
on refugee status. According to the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) since January 2010, about 2,900 Sri
Lankan refugees have returned home with UNHCR assistance. Be it asylum-
seekers or refugees, it is time to pay attention to this situation
developing in the country, specially tomorrow (20) being the World
Refugee Day.
Geetha, a 42 year old Tamil woman, who recently returned from Tamil
Nadu voluntarily, does not get much of this news though she lives in
Colombo. Yet even if she does, it only adds to her misery. To protect
her true identity we will name her Geetha, in support of her and her
family’s struggle to settle down in their motherland and in respect of
their strength that survived against LTTE terrorism. In 2008 Geetha her
husband and their two kids entered Indian soil seeking help to live a
peaceful life. This was the final effort of their line of struggle.
Their first attempt was to settle down in Colombo leaving their home
town, Jaffna. Geetha was born and brought up in Jaffna and later she got
married and enjoyed a wonderful family life blessed with two kids. Yet,
the family got struck with the outbreak of the terrorist war. Squeezed
by the iron clutches of the LTTE the family tried many times to escape
to Colombo. Once they had to pay money to the LTTE for their escape
which eventually failed. During the ceasefire in 2002 the family settled
down in Colombo and the happiness lasted only a few years. With the
outbreak of the Eelam War IV this family, like many families that
enjoyed a decent life in Colombo had to encounter death threats and
abductions for ransoms and extortion from LTTErs and their accomplices.
The menace grew into a large mafia and it was hell for Geetha and her
family. Returning to Jaffna was not practical for them and as such they
decided to go to India. No sooner the LTTE terrorism ended in Sri Lanka,
the family returned and Geetha’s husband tried to seek a job in Canada.
Before going to India the family looked at the option of migrating to
Canada as refugees. Yet the human-smugglers demanded Rs. 6.5 million per
head, irrespective of age.
It was a rigorous and a deadly journey through many points such as
Peru and, Mexico. They valued their lives more and gave up the
unpredictable journey. According to the Office of the United Nations
High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), around 46,000 Sri Lankan
refugees are in 64 countries including India, France, Canada, Germany,
UK, Switzerland, Malaysia, Australia, the United States and Italy of the
total number of voluntarily returned refugees, the vast majority have
returned from refugee camps in Tamil Nadu and small numbers from
Malaysia and Georgia. As at November 01, 2010, according to Indian
government statistics, there are 70,354 Sri Lankan refugees living in
about 112 camps in Tamil Nadu and 32,467 outside the camps.
The UNHCR stated that at least another 2,000 refugees have returned
on their own without help and registered with UNHCR field offices.
However, the number of refugees returning on their own may be higher
since all refugees do not register with UNHCR on their return. Tens of
thousands of internally displaced people are returning to their homes in
the North and it seems that some refugees abroad are also willing to
return. The UN Refugee Agency earlier said that they expected an
increase in the number of returners.
According to the UNHCR both Pakistan and the Islamic Republic of Iran
continue to host some of the world’s largest refugee populations, with
1.7 million Afghan refugees living in Pakistan and another million in
Iran. Having defeated one of the world’s most ruthless terrorist
organisations today Sri Lanka has faced different problems.
Since the thinking patterns of the people are so complicated
sometimes there appears no difference in the behaviour of refugees and
asylum-seekers. |