World Heart Day:
Prevention of ischaemic heart disease
By Dr. Ruwan Ekanayake
Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading cause of death in many
countries including Sri Lanka. However, a curious discrepancy is
observed when considering the epidemiology of IHD in the developed
western countries and developing countries such as Sri Lanka, India and
Thailand. In the USA, the incidence of IHD shows a definite downward
trend. This beneficial effect began to show up in the latter part of the
20th century but statistics indicate that during the past 10 years or so
this downward trend has continued. This drop in the incidence is seen in
the UK, Australia and Norway too.
We must remember that this reduction in IHD is seen in spite of the
rise in the incidence of diabetes mellitus, which is a major risk factor
leading to atherosclerosis and subsequent heart disease.
What is the explanation for this marked reduction of IHD in the
western world? Epidemiologists and community medicine experts attribute
the major credit to health education, in that the population is better
aware of risk factors for IHD and the necessity of life style change. On
the other hand, countries such as Sri Lanka show a constant upward trend
in the incidence of IHD which is true also for all developing countries.
In fact, it is in the third world countries that IHD is now reaching
epidemic proportions.
Many reasons can be recruited to explain this explosion of disease in
the third world scenario. Unhealthy life style is the prominent factor
which is incriminated. The stresses and strains of living affects all
strata of society in the 3rd world where the basic necessities for
civilised living have to be obtained by long hours of poorly paid work.
The mental stress which ensues is compounded by indiscipline in
society and lack of social security. This stressful background is
fertile soil for the seeds of chronic non communicable disease to
germinate. As a result, the 3rd world is showing a marked increase in
IHD which, even there, is most seen in the lower socioeconomic levels of
society.
Controlled
The lesson we learn from the developed countries is that IHD can be
curtailed. This is became the risk factors can be controlled. The
traditional risk factors for causation of IHD are, smoking, high blood
pressure, diabetes mellitus, obesity, high blood lipids, lack of
exercise, mental stress, male sex and genetic predisposition. Consider
these nine factors.
Except for the last two (male sex & genetic predisposition) all
others are within an individual’s control. Hence they are subject to
restriction by motivated persons. This is where educating the public
becomes so vital. Only a well informed public can bring about a
reduction in the burden of non communicable disease.
Legislation and other controls will be of secondary importance. The
risk factors mentioned before are called ‘modifiable’ risk factors for
obvious reasons. New risk factors are being currently discussed which
are largely non modifiable. These generally need costly investigation
and continuous medication for control but will be applicable primarily
in the high risk group of patients, as there is little or no evidence
that mass scale action well lead to appreciable reduction in the
incidence of IHD as the numbers involved are too few to make a
statistical impact on epidemiological parameters.
Cigarette smoke is important as many young people still consider it
as a status symbol. The deleterious effect of passive smoking on the
health of female family mrmbers and born and unborn children need
reiteration.
Good control of high blood pressure and blood sugar levels give
marked benefits in terms of reduction of strokes, kidney disease and
heart attacks. Unfortunately a misconception is perpetuated within
society that drugs given for these diseases lead to irreversible kidney
damage and liver failure. This is wholly untrue. The current drugs are
safe when used under the guidance of competent medical care.
Physical exercise has come to the forefront of many life style
behavior modifying programs, as it rightly should. Exercise not only
reduces atherosclerosis plaque formation but also contributes towards
the formation of new blood vessels to the heart which is called
neo-vascularisation. Thus it has a marked effect in reducing the
incidence of IHD and ischaemia related deaths.
High blood lipids have an established place in the prevention of all
vascular diseases. The term “Cholesterol” has entered the vocabulary of
the least educated individuals who equate cholesterol and heart attacks
as one and the same. The problem with cholesterol is as to how much is
too much?. The normal values for cholesterol recommended by official
organisations show such wide disparity that even health care providers
are at times wondering whether to treat a given level or not.
The confusion is mainly due to the fact that we now work on two ideal
values, one for those who have had no heart disease and another for
those who have already become heart patients. It is wrong to label all
patients with high cholesterol as heart patients. The appropriate value
for a given individual must be decided by the treating physician.
The group of drugs called “Statins” used commonly for the control of
blood lipids are generally extremely safe except for muscle damage
(manifesting as muscle aches and pains) and liver effects (manifesting
as a rise in certain liver tests). These drugs can be used continuously.
No irreversible organ damage has been reported if used under proper
physician guidance. Large doses are now used which also cause much
anxiety to patients but the benefits are thought to be significant.
A basically vegetarian diet, supplemented by fish or chicken as
desired seems to be the best diet that can be recommended. It is however
now known that purely being vegetarian is not of much help if the
calorie load is high. Thus a vegetarian who consumes a large quantity of
food will suffer from obesity and thus have a higher risk of IHD and
diabetes mellitus.
If the excess fat is stored in the centre ( as in the abdomen ) the
risk seems to be greater. On the other hand even a meat rich diet which
does not lead to weight gain may not be as deleterious as over eating
vegetarian food. Hence the recommendation is to be aware of both the
quality and quality of the food consumed.
As is well known, fatty food must be restricted. It is, however, true
that fat confers much desired tastiness to food. This must be kept in
mind.
Hence fat is not totally taboo but may be used in restricted amounts.
Generally speaking, two to three teaspoons of a fat (solid or non solid)
is appropriate amount of intake, specially if the poly unsaturated or
mono un-saturated fats are used.Trans fats have recently been
highlighted although their deleterious effects have been known for
several decades. Always look at the label on the carton as western
countries now require by law that the transfat content be displayed in
processed foods.
The trans fat component in natural foods is almost negligible. Only
on processing food that trans fat form, which are atherogenic as well as
carcinogenic. For this same reason, the poly unsaturated foods must not
be repeatedly reheated as they transform into “trans” form in the
process.
Finally a word on mental stress would appropriate. Even genetically
identical twins seem to show different tendencies to develop IHD if the
mental stress component is different. The twin living in a less stressed
environment did better on IHD scores then his/her twin living in
mentally stressful situations. Thus, lifestyle modifications must
necessarily involve relaxation techniques which must be multifaceted to
be universally beneficial.
The writer is Consultant Cardiologist, National Hospital of Sri
Lanka.
Choline may influence gene expression
Just as women are advised to get plenty of folic acid around the time
of conception and throughout early pregnancy, new research suggests
another very similar nutrient may one day deserve a spot on the
obstetrician's list of recommendations.Consuming greater amounts of
choline - a nutrient found in eggs and meat = during pregnancy may lower
an infant's vulnerability to stress-related illnesses, such as mental
health disturbances, and chronic conditions, like hypertension, later in
life.
In an early study in The FASEB Journal, nutrition scientists and
obstetricians found that higher-than-normal amounts of choline in the
diet during pregnancy changed epigenetic markers - modifications on our
DNA that tell our genes to switch on or off, to go gangbusters or keep a
low profile - in the foetus. While epigenetic markers don't change our
genes, they make a permanent imprint by dictating their fate: If a gene
is not expressed - turned on - it's as if it didn't exist.
The finding became particularly exciting when researchers discovered
that the affected markers were those that regulated the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal or HPA axis, which controls virtually all
hormone activity in the body, including the production of the hormone
cortisol that reflects our response to stress and regulates our
metabolism, among other things.
More choline in the mother's diet led to a more stable HPA axis and
consequently less cortisol in the foetus.
As with many aspects of our health, stability is a very good thing:
Past research has shown that early exposure to high levels of cortisol,
often a result of a mother's anxiety or depression, can increase a
baby's lifelong risk of stress-related and metabolic disorders.
- MNT
Why women are into ‘self-harming'
By Harshani A. Pinnawala
In general, ‘self-harming’ is the result of an inability to cope with
problems in healthy ways. A person might have a hard time in regulating,
expressing or understanding her/his emotions.
‘Self-harming’ or ‘Deliberate self-harming’ is also known as
‘self-injury’ which is a term given to those who deliberately harm
themselves. The most frequent form of self-injury is skin-cutting.
Normally, the cuttings are not too deep. In addition, it includes
burning, overdose, scalding, punching, banging, or bruising their body
in some way. Some pull out their skin and pick their skin.
Self-harming might bring a momentary sense of calm and a release of
tension, yet, it follows the feelings of guilt and shame and the painful
emotions might return after the particular incident.
Causes of self-harming
There is no definite cause for a person to act like this. It is more
or less like a symptom of other mental disorders. According to DSM-IV-TR
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), ‘self-harming’
categorised as a symptom of Borderline personality disorder which is a
subtype of Personality Disorders. It can also be due to physical abuse,
sexual abuse or eating disorders, low self esteem and perfectionism.
Often the person does not feel pain or distress during the act, but,
often feelings of relief and satisfaction have been described as soon as
the act has accomplished the desired effect. Someone who cuts themselves
habitually might say that they feel overwhelming feelings before the
event, feels no pain during the cutting. But, they get a great relief
once blood has been drawn. The person does not mean to do themselves
serious injury. However, in certain occasions, the damage can end up
being life threatening if overdose is severe or blood loss is
great.Reasons given for self-harming have included feeling useless and
desperate, having feelings of guilt or being ashamed, great sadness, a
loss of reality or simply feeling numb towards life in general. Whatever
the reasons given, most individuals have their own unique experience,
motivation, emotional backgrounds for wanting to harm themselves.
Reason
For most individuals there will be some sort of underlying reason for
this problem. This may be that they have suffered some sort of abuse in
the past, be in an abusive relationship, and have got extremely low
self-esteem for some reason or that they feel deep guilt caused by their
previous behaviour or actions.
‘Self-harming’ is widespread than most people think. It is a subject
that is mostly connected to females. The reason might be the different
techniques that both men and women apply to cope up their matters. For
example, the way of men expressing the strong feelings such as anger,
irritation, and annoyance are different from the way of women expressing
themselves. Most often men act violently and talk harshly, while women
remain in silent and calm. Evidence has found that women are up to four
times more likely than men to self-harm. Several myths are there with
regard to ‘self-harming'. One might think that it is a failed suicide
attempt. This is not exactly true since it is one way of carrying on
with life, not of dying. Furthermore, it is not that the person is
seeking only attention from others, but, their expected final outcome is
to release the tension and pain that they are unable to cope.
‘Self-harming’ is also not a sign of madness, yet, it is a sign of
distress and a sign of a person who is trying to cope with her or his
life as best she or he can. These patients do not harm others as many
think. Therefore, the fear which most of us have is irrelevant.
Self-harming is a complicated problem that affects many women in
Europe than in Asia. This does not mean that it is a rare disorder in
Asia. Experts estimate that about 1 percent of the population has
self-harmed.
Treatment
First, it is very important to know that if a person starts
self-harming, it is very difficult to stop it since it is an addictive
behaviour. Therefore, the patients need to seek professional help and
treatment initially, it is important to treat the injury whether this be
controlling severe bleeding, treating infection or undertaking an
overdose. Once the immediate medical problems have been dealt with, the
underlying, psychological problems must be addressed. To treat the
person properly, he or she should be able to admit that he/she has a
problem and want to discover the source and address the problem in a
different way.
The use of behavioural therapies, group therapies, counselling or
other proven method of addressing psychological problems could be used.
These will have a greater success rate if they are addressed using
professional guidance from those who are specially trained in this area.
Cognitive-behavioural therapy might help a person to realise the reason
of doing it. It also helps to cope up with their problems without
hurting themselves physically. Eye Movement desensitisation and
Reprocessing therapy (EMDR) which is a form of psychotherapy used to
help with post-traumatic disorder.It may be beneficial to the persons to
gain confidence in their own abilities and also by ensuring they have a
supportive network around them. This can be done through their friends
and family or the person who is helping them overcome the problem.
Communication plays an important role while addressing the problem and
the person should not be embarrassed or ashamed of confiding their
deepest feelings with others whom they cannot trust. Drugs might also be
helpful up to a certain limit. Some drugs might be very addictive.
However, it is important to know that the type of treatment which is
most effective is different from person to person.
- The writer holds an MSc in Psychology
Large donors force WHO to reform
The current practice of large donors is forcing the World Health
Organisation (WHO) and the World Bank to reflect on how to reform to
remain more appealing to the wider set of stakeholders and interests at
play, according to Devi Sridhar from the University of Oxford writing in
this week's PLOS Medicine.
Sridhar argues that since the priorities of funding bodies largely
dictate what health issues and diseases are studied, a major challenge
in the governance of global health research funding is agenda-setting,
which in turn is a consequence of a larger phenomenon - “multi-bi
financing.”
This term refers to the practice of donors choosing to route funding
- earmarked for specific sectors, themes, countries, or regions -
through multilateral agencies such as the World Health Organisation and
the World Bank and to the emergence of new multistakeholder initiatives
such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and the
GAVI Alliance.
Sridhar says: “These new multistakeholder initiatives have five
distinct characteristics: a wider set of stakeholders that include
non-state institutions, narrower problem-based mandates, financing based
on voluntary contributions, no country presence, and legitimacy based on
effectiveness, not process.”
Sridhar argues that the risk of multi-bi financing is that difficult
choices about priority-setting in health will be made in the marketplace
of global initiatives, rather than in the community that will have to
live with those choices.She says: “The shift to multi-bi financing
likely reflects a desire by participating governments, and others, to
control international agencies more tightly.”However, Sridhar adds: “one
major impact of multi-bi financing has been to shine a clear light on
how and where multilateral institutions, such as the World Bank and the
World Health Organisation, might do better.”
MNT
Scientists hope gene breakthrough could help men with breast cancer
Scientists have found a gene which can increase the risk of male
breast cancer by 50 percent, after the world's largest study into the
disease.
Screening of the genetic codes of more than 800 male breast cancer
patients, mainly from the UK, has revealed that mutations in one
particular gene play a role in the disease, and could herald the
development of new treatments specifically for men. Very little is known
about the causes of male breast cancer, which is diagnosed in 350 men in
the UK every year, compared with 48,000 women.
Previously researchers uncovered that faulty BRCA2 genes are involved
in around 10 per cent of male breast cancer cases but they have now
established that faulty RAD51B genes, which have also been found to
increase the risk of breast cancer in women, also play a role in the
disease in men.
Dr Nick Orr, a group leader at the Breakthrough Breast Cancer
Research Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and one of
the study's authors, said, “This study represents a leap forward in our
understanding of male breast cancer.”
The research published today in Nature Genetics will help doctors
predict whether men are more at risk of developing breast cancer. “
For a general man in the population this latest news isn't that
significant because the risk of breast cancer in males is already so
low,” Dr Orr said. “But for people who are already at high risk of
breast cancer, for example men who have mutations in the BRCA2 gene,
having this extra information could really help our ability to predict
whether they are going to get the disease or not.”Scientists from the
Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre were part of an international
research team involved in the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS),
which investigated 447,000 alterations in the DNA of participants as
part of a wider four-year-long study.Scientists now hope to build on the
success of the GWAS’ findings to identify further causes of both male
and female breast cancer.
- The Independent
|