Government dealings are always transparent - Minister Nimal Siripala
de Silva
By Uditha Kumarasinghe
A one-time senior lawyer who had a lucrative practice in the Colombo
courts for years, the Leader of the House and Irrigation and Water
Management Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva joined the SLFP at a crucial
period when it was undergoing political vicissitudes. He was the first
ever Asian to be elected President of the World Health Assembly and
Chairman of the Executive Board of the World Health Organisation when he
was Sri Lanka's Health Minister. To his credit, he never performed
political somersaults but remained overtly loyal to his political
ideology. The Minister in an interview with the Sunday Observer said the
Government is very transparent in everything it does and it has nothing
to hide. The Government is happy that within a short span after the
terrorism was eradicated it has done much in resettlement and
reconciliation and whatever is left out would be done soon.
The Minister said the Government invited UN High Commissioner for
Human Rights Navaneetham Pillay to see for herself the human rights
situation in Sri Lanka, the vast development programs launched in the
North and the East and the resettlement scheme implemented in the
North.” However she is making statements in Geneva without coming here.
This clearly shows, how biased they are”, he said. All Commonwealth
parliamentarians who came to Sri Lanka to attend the recent Commonwealth
Parliamentary Association conference flew to Jaffna and Kilinochchi. The
Government permitted them to go all over the country and gather
information without any restriction. In fact they saw for themselves the
ground situation in Sri Lanka.
Excerpts of the interview:
Q: Would you comment on the latest British Channel 4 theatrics
which coincides with the ongoing Human Rights sessions in Geneva?
A: We had said from the beginning that there is a conspiracy
against Sri Lanka in the international arena. Earlier too they had
brought this Channel 4 drama to coincide with the previous UNHRC
meetings. They had side-meetings in the UNHRC where I was also present.
We had some experts flown from here to Geneva and explained that these
are creations by the LTTE upfront organisations and there is no truth in
them.
Then that issue was over and nobody spoke about Channel 4 for the
last one year. Now they have created another video. We believe it is a
mere creation and not an exact happening. Today, in the present world,
people can create many things with the help of cameras, photos and
technology. Sometimes when people see them, they believe them it. These
emotional pictures being shown, are not real and are mere creations.
The Armed Forces have vehemently objected to the visuals. They
categorically deny such incidents occurred during the last few days of
the war against terrorists. It confirms the magnitude of the
international conspiracy against Sri Lanka and the Rajapaksa Government.
Q: Is there a sinister agenda behind the Opposition Leader
Ranil Wickremesinghe's recent 'Sathyagraha' in Jaffna urging the
Government to vacate High Security Zones? Would you elaborate on this?
A: I think the Opposition Leader is trying to gain political
mileage. He had gone to Jaffna and staged a 'Sathyagraha'. We have to be
mindful of the security of the country and the land which has been
liberated from the clutches of terrorists. We have to ensure that peace
is preserved and the seeds of terrorism are not germinated again on the
Jaffna soil.
To protect the liberated land from further terrorist spells, we need
a very close monitoring of the area. Therefore, the Security Forces need
some lands for their presence there. I made a statement in Parliament
recently with regard to the issue and I categorically said in the case
of private lands, we would pay compensation. In the case of Government
lands, it is the right of the Government to use it for a purpose which
the Government needs. Many people have forgotten the fact that the
government has resettled thousands of families in the North with better
living conditions.
Q: Minor incidents affecting inter-religious harmony are mere
isolated cases confined to one place or the other. Is the Opposition
trying to blow them out of proportion and create chaos?
A: I appealed to the Opposition Leader in Parliament not to
inflate the situation. We have to ensure that these situations are
defused because they are mere isolated incidents created by some unruly
elements which we don't condone whether they stem from the Buddhists,
Muslims, Christians or Hindus. If any of them are engaged in extremist
activities, we are not condoning them. From whatever quarter it comes,
it is wrong and we have to defuse the tension soon. We have to take
rational decisions. If we become emotional in the issues, it will not
produce any long-term good results. Emotion is sometimes resorted to, to
catch votes from here and there. Emotions may work, but the ultimate
danger it causes will be great.
Q: The Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa at a recent
seminar held at the Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute said it would be
prudent for the Western world to see for themselves the mega development
launched by the Sri Lankan Government in the North and the East without
simply depending on the sinister disinformation campaign of INGOs, NGOs
and interested parties. What is your comment?
A: It was the policy of the Government. We invited the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights Navaneetham Pillay to see for herself the
human rights situation in Sri Lanka, the vast development programs
launched in the North and the East and the resettlement program. But she
is merely making statements in Geneva without coming here. It clearly
shows, how biased they are. We have invited the American, British,
French and German people to see for themselves the significant
development in the country. All Commonwealth Parliamentarians who came
to Sri Lanka to attend the recent Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
(CPA) conference flew to Jaffna and Kilinochchi. We permitted them to go
all over the country and gather information without any restriction.
This Government has nothing to hide. We are transparent in all our
dealings. We are happy that within a very short period after eradicating
terrorism, we have done a great deal of work in the context of
resettlement and reconciliation and whatever is left will be completed
in due course.
Q: CHOGM augurs well for the country. Why have certain
countries invoked the bogey of human rights to scuttle this event of
common interest?
A: I think it is part of the international conspiracy. We had
the CPA conference in Sri Lanka recently. Nearly 700 to 800
Parliamentarians from Commonwealth countries attended. They were happy
with the arrangements and the prevailing situation in the country. They
saw for themselves the ground situation. So why not CHOGM be held in Sri
Lanka? The CPA conference was represented by all Commonwealth countries
and the Speakers of their Parliaments. If the Speakers could come, why
can't the Leaders come for CHOGM?
Q: There are countries which have openly violated the UN
charter, human rights and territorial integrity of other nations, but
escaped without being hauled up before the UNHRC. Why is this
discrimination only against third world developing countries?
A: The general perception is that today the UNHRC has become a
highly politicised body, because various political forces are playing a
greater role there. They are politically divided. If they want to punish
a country politically, they get together. We don't see UNHRC as an
independent organisation which takes into account the true facts and
circumstances in arriving at a decision. When they vote, the whole
European community vote as a block. There may be differences of opinion
within the European community as well. However, they have no say. This
is how the UNHRC is structured and how they vote. Therefore, we can't
accept the verdict of the UNHRC, because mostly it's a political
decision. Human rights violations in Iraq and Afghanistan and in most of
the developed countries, are simply ignored and they don't dare to bring
resolutions against those countries. Other countries are being
influenced by these strong countries.
Q: One cannot understand the logic of the countries guilty of
serious human rights violations pontificating on human rights to others.
Why can't Third World countries mobilise their strength in fighting this
gross injustice at the UN forum?
A: Of course there are non-aligned countries. But most
developed countries are aligned with economic ties. So it is very
difficult for third world countries to emerge. Fortunately we have China
and India in the Asian region which are emerging as economic giants. A
time will come when we can defeat these Western powers. So it all
depends on the economy, trade and technology. We were behind most of the
European countries in technology several decades ago. But now Asia is
becoming a giant in technology and economic development. This change is
now taking place.
Q: India's Janatha Party Leader Dr. Subramanian Swamy, an
eminent scholar has spoken of a positive outcome for Sri Lanka at the
UNHRC presumably after eliminating the LTTE. In the light of this, what
would be India's attitude towards Sri Lanka this time?
A: We know India's attitude. According to reports it is not
positive towards Sri Lanka. That is also political, we have to
understand the problem the Indian Government is facing. At present the
Congress Party enjoys no majority within the Government. Hence it has to
depend on many of its allies from Tamil Nadu and other parts of the
country.
Their decision is very much influenced by small regional parties and
their MPs. So the main Indian Government has a problem. We have to
understand it. Sometimes they won't come and support Sri Lanka and
thereafter see that the Government is fallen. First we have to survive
politically. Therefore, this problem is there. I think Sri Lanka and
India have to understand each other.
Q: People are utterly helpless when 'accidents' such as the
death of a child at a private hospital and law student Achala's
amputation due to the alleged medical negligence occur. What is the
course of action open to the victims? What action could be taken to
check them?
A:When I was the Health Minister, I brought the Private
Medical Institutions Act to ensure a quality service to the people and
also to ensure that patients are not exploited. I should say that
various forces in the country including some medical professionals did
not allow me to implement this act. That is an unfortunate situation.
When I tried to frame regulations the GMOA objected to some of the
regulations. If the regulations and the Act had been properly
implemented and the doctors doing private practice were registered under
the Private Medical Institution Act, there would have been a better
health care and less negligence.
Q: It is reported that over 150 garment factories have been
closed by now and speculation is rife that the Government will negotiate
for the resumption of the GSP facility. Could you enlighten us on this?
A: The GSP facility was there earlier and it was later
withdrawn, but still garment factories in Sri Lanka are doing very well.
We have to compete with other countries. Our garment industry is mature
enough to enter the competitive market and compete with others from
different parts of the world and continue to engage in the industry. I
don't think that's a problem.
Q: The UNP has already tabled a No-Confidence motion against
Foreign Employment Promotion and Welfare Minister Dilan Perera due to
the failure to save Rizana. Would you comment on this?
A: I think this is now history, Minister Dilan Perera
explained in Parliament the steps taken by President Mahinda Rajapaksa,
the Minister himself and the Government to save Rizana. An Indonesian
maid was killed in Saudi Arabia. Both are Muslim countries. When it
comes to the Sharia law, they are not bothered whether one is a Buddhist
or Hindu.
They enforce the law. There may be certain flaws in their legal
system itself which we think are cruel and inhuman. It is the law of the
land. So what can we do about it? We can't change the laws of Saudi
Arabia. We can't change the Sharia law.
A large amount of blood money was offered by Minister Dilan Perera
and the Foreign Employment Bureau to save Rizana's life. According to
information, even the Saudi King himself tried to persuade the father
and mother of the dead child to accept the blood money and release
Rizana. They were so adamant that they didn't accept the money. So how
can the UNP put the blame on Minister Dilan Perera or the Foreign
Employment Bureau for that? This is cheap political publicity which the
Opposition is looking for. I think mature and right thinking people of
the country will vehemently reject this attitude. As the Leader of the
House, I will ensure that we would defeat this No Confidence motion with
a large majority.
Q: You have completed 30 years in Sri Lankan politics. Would
you like to retrace the ups and downs of your political odyssey?
A: There had been ups and downs of my political life. Through
hard work, I started my political career as Opposition Leader of the
Colombo Municipal Council on May 18, 1983. In the 1989 General Election,
I was elected to Parliament having secured 38,000 votes from the Colombo
district. I have held important ministerial portfolios and it was my
destiny that gave me the opportunity to serve the people. I brought
honour to Sri Lanka as the first Asian to be the President of the World
Health Assembly and the Chairman of the Executive Board of the World
Health Organisation. I am quite content with my political career. I was
also the Chief Peace Negotiator at the Peace Talks with the LTTE.
President Rajapaksa has extended his fullest support and cooperation and
appointed me as the Leader of the House. I am grateful to the President
and happy that I have served the Badulla district, especially
Uva-Wellassa where our ancestors had suffered repression. I would help
support those people and the country as well. When I was the Health
Minister, I developed the country's health sector and raised the Health
Index of Sri Lanka.
|