Imported milk powder still a contentious issue
As the imported milk
powder issue gathers momentum raising concerns and confusion among the
public, the Sunday Observer spoke to some of the main personalities
relevant to the milk powder issue for their comments.
Fonterra and Maliban refute allegations of
contamination:
ITI stands by its findings
By Carol Aloysius
As Fonterra Lanka Pvt continues to vigorously refute claims its milk
powder was contaminated, in the latest development to the milk powder
issue in Sri Lanka, a leading news agency Saturday, has said the New
Zealand dairy giant had suspended operations in Sri Lanka temporarily,
citing product bans, court cases and angry demonstrations over the milk
product. Fonterra CEO, Theo Spierings has been quoted as saying that the
temporary suspension of exports from New Zealand to Sri Lanka was a
safety measure for its 755 people working here.
Maliban Pvt Ltd whose products were also said to have tested positive
for DCD has also denied these charges. Executive Director ,Lakshman
Weerasooriya told the Sunday Observer, Friday, “We re-checked the
samples of non fat skimmed Australian milk powder that had tested
positive for (DCD) by the Industrial Technology Institute (ITI) at our
Singapore lab which informed us that there was no DCD or any bacteria
that could harm human health in our milk powder products or in any
Australian dairy products. This makes us to suspect that a third party
with vested interests may have deliberately inserted some contaminated
packages into our cardboard boxes in which the unbranded packages come
in.” Asked how this could happen, he said, “The milk powder comes packed
in cardboard boxes without any brand on them as the boxes carry the
brand name on the cover. So it is easy for anyone who wants to spoil our
image to introduce contaminated packages after removing the original
packs from the boxes in our warehouses.”
Denying reports that the company would be suing the ITI for damaging
its image, he said, “The ITI is a trusted institution in the country
with highly qualified people. So we are not contesting what they have
said about the tested samples.” He added however there could have been a
mix- up of the 16 samples tested.
ITI chairman, Professor W. Abeywickrama however said he stood by the
ITI tests as they were done scientifically leaving no room for error.
“It is upto Maliban Pvt Lanka to find out from where the source of
contamination originated – whether locally or abroad”, he said.
Weerasooriya however countered that the company was not manufacturing
the milk powder locally” We get it down from Australia.
The Australian government has certified that in the past century they
have not used DCD in their territory including Tasmania. He said if
anyone wanted to clarify this they should contact the Australian High
Commission.
Health Ministry clarifies banned milk brands
Health Ministry spokesman W.A.D. Wanninayake yesterday told the
Sunday Observer that the seven samples of full cream milk reported by
the media to have been banned , were in fact not banned, and orders had
been given to release them to the open market.
“ They were found to have no Dicyanadiamide ( DCD) and permission was
given to release these brands.” He said that the milk powders that were
banned were not branded as reported. “They were full cream milk powder
which came without a brand on arrival to the Port. The branding is done
later by the manufacturing or supplying company.”
Asked what steps the Health Ministry was taking about the presence of
whey protein concentrates, (Clostridium Botulinum) the virus carrying
the infective agent causing Botulism which could cause severe diarrhoea
and severe neurological effects, he said the seven member ministerial
committee appointed on a directive by the Health Minister to probe the
milk contamination issue which had met the Minister on Wednesday, had
decided to intensify the search for contaminated milk products in the
local market. The Food Advisory Committee of the Health ministry has
decided release ten brands of milk powder and infant formula as it has
found no Botulinum bacteria in them containing whey protein according to
a media release.
With regard to misleading advertisements on milk, he said a directive
was issued by the Health Ministry that anyone attempting to mislead the
public with false advertisements could face court action. “We can’t
force companies to withhold advertisements. But we expect them to act
responsibly as the public’s health is at stake.” He said, so far there
had been no misleading advertisements on milk products following the
court order.
Meanwhile Gampaha Additional District Judge, Indika Kalingawansa
dismissed the Enjoining Order earlier issued by her on Fonterra Brands
Lanka Pvt Ltd from selling or distributing its products through agents
as well as any form of advertising in a misleading manner.
Botulinum effects more harmful than DCD - Health official
The effects of infected whey protein concentrate (Botulinum) could be
more injurious to health than dicyanadiamide (DCD), according to a
health official.
“Upto now, DCD has no proven adverse effects on human beings
according to experiments by the PANAMUSA and WHO guidelines as well as
UK Toxbase . But there’s always a risk and experiments are continuing to
test the effects of DCD on the Reproductive system and central nervous
system,”, a spokesman for the Poisons Centre at the National Hospital,
Colombo, Dr Prasanna Karunanayake told the Sunday Observer.
However, adverse effects of Whey Protein (the first extract from
milk) which could cause Chlostridum Botulinium which is the infective
agent carrying the Botulism disease, had already been reported in china
and USSR which banned all dairy foods containing the ingredient ,he
said. “Botulism is a very dangerous disease acomplaints of DCD or Whey
product toxicity so far, he replied in the negative. “But the risk
factor is there”, he added.
Meanwhile, on a tip off Customs officials Wednesday, seized a large
haul of undeclared whey protein canisters from a warehouse in Wattala
containing unaccompanied luggage. |