Hard-earned peace will not be compromised
The United Nations (UN) has come
out strongly against human rights violations and its Human Rights
Council (UHHRC) has been exerting undue pressure on Sri Lanka,
highlighting only the final phase of the country's battle against
terrorism.
While turning a blind eye to the human rights violations of the
US-led NATO forces in Afghanistan and the American drone attacks in
Pakistan like a toothless tiger, UNHRC chief Navi Pillay has evinced
extraordinary concern about the human rights violations of the LTTE
terrorists killed in action.
At a time the impartiality and transparency of the UN has been
questioned by many around the world, the staff of the United Nations
have now accused the world body and its Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon of
violating their human rights.
The worldwide Staff Union representatives of the UN took up these
issues when they met the Secretary-General in the US last Wednesday.
The UN commemorated Human Rights Day this week amidst damning charges
that the world body is unilaterally proposing drastic changes to the
working conditions and salaries of staffers without due consultation,
thereby violating their basic rights.
The Geneva-based United Nations Staff Union is protesting against
"the withdrawal of the right to union recognition by Secretary-General
Ban Ki-moon and his refusal to honour negotiating rights for elected
representatives of his employees".
The US has proposed an eight-percent pay cut while the UK, the
largest contributing country, has asked the Secretary-General to slash
costs further.
The UN's Geneva Staff Union President Ian Richards, in a letter to
his colleagues, has said that the discussions on pensions have included
a proposal to increase the staff contribution by one percent, reduce the
organisation's contribution by one percent and review the two-track
system.
Apart from Pillay, British Prime Minister David Cameron waxed
eloquent on human rights and campaigns against Sri Lanka. To cap it all,
he even went to the extent of unilaterally setting deadlines for Sri
Lanka.
Jean-Baptiste Poquelin, better known by the stage name Moliere and
undoubtedly France's greatest playwright, had identified hypocrisy as
the most protected by vices. This indeed is food for thought when one
considers the Western hypocrisy on Sri Lanka.
Last month, more light was shed on the circumventions in Whitehall
and Washington delaying the publication of the findings of Sir John
Chilcot's marathon inquiry into the background of the Iraq invasion.
The UK's Chilcot Inquiry was convened under the then British Prime
Minister Gordon Brown, to sanction the decisions taken by the UK
government and military, pre- and post-invasion. It ran from November
24, 2009 to February 2, 2011 at an estimated cost of 7.5 million
sterling pounds. The unpublished report is believed to run into
1,000,000 words.
The British Prime Minister, during his tour to Sri Lanka for the
Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting 2013, unleashed an undiplomatic
public tirade, alleging that his host country was guilty of war crimes
during the battle against the LTTE.
Surprisingly, these accusations come from the very man who covers up
the genesis of massacres of genocidal magnitude - and who enjoined in
the near destruction of Libya, the resultant lynching of the country's
leader, the murder of his sons and small grandchildren and others in
another decimation of a country which had threatened no other, according
to an article published in the Global Research.
Moreover, Cameron is also accused of backing funding for the
cannibalistic-orientated insurgents in Syria, the beheading,
dismembering, looting, displacing, kidnapping, chemical weapons
lobbying, child killing, infanticide-bent crazies, including those from
his own country.
Cameron demanded that Sri Lanka ensures "credible, transparent and
independent investigations" and said if this did not happen by March
2014, the deadline he arbitrarily imposed, he would press the UN Human
Rights Council to hold an international inquiry. Cameron has perhaps
ignored the fact that Sri Lanka, in spite of its battle against
terrorism, is the only country in South Asia to be rated high on the
Human Development Index while the UK and its allies' recent victims -
Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan barely make it to the bottom.
Cameron is at sixes and sevens as to how he could evade telling the
truth to the Chilcot Inquiry whether he had read a letter from writer
Lesley Docksey in The Independent of November 18 or not.
These are only a few instances where the UN and British leaders have
shown their true colours, contrary to what they preach to countries such
as Sri Lanka.
Archbishop Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith has said that foreigners "should
not tell us what to do. We are not a pack of fools". He has called upon
the TNA to arrive at a political settlement with the Government so that
there would be no room for foreign intervention.
The Archbishop has warned of a possible foreign intervention unless
Sri Lanka worked towards reconciliation and address allegations of war
crimes during the battle against LTTE terrorists. This is precisely what
the Government is engaged in at present.
Based on the recommendations of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation
Commission (LLRC), a census is now under way to ascertain the exact
number of persons killed, injured, victimised and the losses from 1982
to 2009 during the height of LTTE terror.
Needless to state that Sri Lanka is making a sincere and determined
effort in reconciliation and implementing the key recommendations of the
LLRC Report. The West should not impose anything on Sri Lanka and expect
miracles overnight.
There is no need whatsoever for any international investigations as
it would pose a serious threat to the country's sovereignty. The
international community should bear in mind that barely four-and-a-half
years have elapsed since Sri Lanka crushed three decades of brutal LTTE
terrorism.
The Government has spared no pains to uplift the living standards of
people in the North and the East who had been liberated from the
clutches of LTTE terror. More importantly, people of all ethnic and
religious persuasions are now living in perfect peace and harmony in all
parts of the country. A population of nearly 21 million people -
Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims and Burghers, who had been subjected to
mass-scale indiscriminate bomb explosions are now enjoying the dividends
of peace.
The West should take cognizance of these positive developments as Sri
Lanka marches towards new horizons. Harping on the human rights of Tiger
terrorists killed in action would get us nowhere. Perhaps, some Western
leaders may be doing so to appease the Tamil Diaspora and increase their
vote bases through their adopted Tamils.
Be it Cameron or any other Western leader, nobody has the right to
challenge a sovereign nation such as Sri Lanka. The masses have reposed
implicit faith in President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the UPFA Government at
successive elections. The Government is only answerable to the people of
Sri Lanka and certainly not the Western politicians who sing hosannas
for the LTTE rump.Sri Lanka has come a long way with the end of
terrorism and set new world standards in resettlement. In this scenario,
is it fair for the West to expect Sri Lanka to perform miracles and
achieve more than any other country after such a bitter battlefield
experience with a ruthless terrorist outfit?
Nobody should be permitted to rob Sri Lanka's hard-earned peace on
the pretext of protecting human rights.
|