Wimal admits to mass grave in North but rebuffed by Malwatte
Mahanayake

President
Maithripala Sirisena hosted a dinner for some leading civil society
activists and trade union leaders, at the President’s House, on
Wednesday night.
Leaders of the National Movement for a Just Society, Puravesi Balaya
and some prominent trade unions attended the event. Most of them were
instrumental in President Sirisena’s successful election campaign in
January, last year, and had strong links with the ruling alliance.
However, many civil society and trade union leaders had mixed
reactions about the government’s progress, over the past 16 months.
Although they unanimously agreed that the ‘January 8 change’ had made a
positive impact on the government, there were some concerns about the
national unity government’s commitment to some key promises given at the
Presidential election campaign. One of them was the government’s pledge
to take stern action on those who embezzled billions of public money,
under the previous regime.
‘It’s true that the government has made some steps to investigate
into those cases of corruption. But, we cannot be happy about the
overall progress of the inquiries.
There has to be a special mechanism to fast-track this process.
Otherwise, the people will lose faith in the government,” a prominent
civil society leader told others, before the arrival of the President.
However, they welcomed the verdict in the Bharatha Lakshman
Premachandra murder case, saying it restored the people’s faith in the
judiciary. The President ran late for the meeting as he attended the
launching ceremony of a book written by Parliamentarian Malith
Jayathilleke.
The Parliamentarian’s book was based on the ‘January 8 turnaround’
and the President seemed to be in a good mood when he walked into the
meeting at the President’s House.
Ministry allocation
 |
UPFA Parliamentarian Wimal
Weerawansa met the chief prelate of the Malwatte chapter,
Thibbatuwawe Sri Siddartha Sumangala Thera |
The civil society and trade union leaders, speaking to the President,
highlighted their key issues, including the composition of the current
cabinet.
They said the allocation of ministries had not been done in a
scientific manner. They were also of the view that the current
allocation of ministries had left space for underperforming ministers.
Therefore, they demanded an urgent reshuffle to tie up the ‘loose ends’
in the Cabinet of Ministers.
They also stressed the need for setting up a special judicial process
to look into cases involving large-scale corruption and abuse of power.
They said the current process was time consuming and the patience of the
public was wearing thin.
They also handed over a special letter to President Sirisena,
highlighting their key demands and grievances.
Addressing the gathering, however, the President did not give any
undertaking. But, he promised to look into the problems and take
necessary action to address the issues raised by the civil society
groups.
“I am not a perfect person. There can be mistakes on my part,” the
President said, addressing the gathering.
“Other presidents who ruled this country did not have many problems
during their initial phases. People allowed them to work. But my
situation is different. I had to face various issues since the day I
assumed office,” the President added, explaining his position. He also
said that nothing would stop him from delivering on the promises he made
at the last Presidential election.
“Some say it’s hard to get appointments to meet me. You don’t need
appointments to see me. Come to my Paget Road residence at 8.30 in the
morning, even without an appointment. That’s the best place to meet me,”
the President told the invitees.
Duminda
Before attending the meeting with the President, Prof Sarath
Wijesuriya, a stalwart of the National Movement for a Just Society,
stirred a hornet’s nest when he addressed a book launch in Battaramulla.
Speaking at the event, Prof Wijesuriya made a revelation about former
Parliamentarian Duminda Silva who was recently convicted for the murder
of Bharatha Lakshman Premachandra.
“There was a time when Duminda Silva’s family ran a boutique. I’ve
bought lunch packets from him. After joining politics, he became one of
the wealthiest politicians. Where did this money come from?” Wijesuriya
asked.
“It is this system that protects corrupt politicians. That’s why we
need to correct the system. For instance, Bharatha Lakshman
Premachandra’s murder case could have gone on for years if Hirunika
Premachandra did not have the civil power to push the process. In this
context, what is the plight of an ordinary citizen?” Wijesuriya said,
alarming the social activists on the current state of affairs in the
country.
The judgment against Silva, however, made it clear that everyone was
equal before the court of law and gone are the days when politicians
were larger than the judiciary.
Following the verdict, however, Hirunika Premachandra, the slain
politician’s daughter has now launched a fresh war against Duminda Silva
saying the latter misled the judiciary by giving false medical reports
on his injuries.
Duminda Silva was admitted to the Colombo National Hospital in
October 2011, following the shootout in which Premachandra was killed.
Hospital authorities at that point, said the parliamentarian’s condition
was critical as there were gunshot wounds to his head. After initial
surgeries in Colombo, Silva was taken to Mount Elizabeth Hospital in
Singapore for further treatment.
Silva recovered miraculously in Singapore and returned to the
country. He was later arrested by the Police while in a private hospital
and released on bail. After being granted bail, Silva, whose brain was
‘severely damaged’ following gunshot wounds walked out of the hospital,
smiling.
After his release, Silva led a perfectly normal life and he even
attended parliamentary sessions. He also applied to contest the last
parliamentary election on the UPFA ticket, but the party rejected his
nominations. Silva, however, remained an ally of the former President
who led the campaign of the party at the last Parliamentary election.
With the aim of questioning Silva’s medical reports, Hirunika
Premachandra on Sunday, published a picture of her father which was
taken shortly after the shootout. Premachandra was shot in the head and
the photograph clearly showed the cavity created by the gunshot.
“Every time I see this picture I don’t think it’s real, because I
only remember his handsome face with a smile on. For the first time in
my life I am posting this picture, not for your sympathy but for you to
understand this is how a ‘shot in the head’ looks like. It’s impossible
to live even a second after a shot like this... something to think
about,” the Parliamentarian posted, while publishing the photo. Her
remark was directed at former parliamentarian Silva who also claimed
that he was shot in the head by Premachandra’s supporters. Her post went
viral on social media platforms over the weekend and many websites
reproduced the photograph.
By making the statement, Premachandra has requested authorities to
investigate into the conduct of Dr. Maheshi Wijeratne, a Consultant
Neurologist who treated Duminda Silva after the incident. The
Premachandra family has indicated that they will proceed with their
battle against Silva and his allies.
Surgery
A day after Premachandra published the photograph of her father,
Dilini Silva, Duminda Silva’s sister, published some photos of Silva,
taken during a brain surgery. She said Silva had to go through an open
skull surgery after the shootout and was under medical supervision. It
was clear that Silva’s sister was trying to respond to Hirunika’s claims
by publishing several pictures of her brother.
Speaking to our sister paper, the Daily News, after Dilini Silva’s
response, Premachandra said she was glad that the former went on to
publish the pictures of her brother’s surgery.
“There were doubts about his medical reports. Many people assumed
that he would not be able to lead a normal life, after being shot in the
head. That was why certain questions were raised about his health
condition,” Premachandra said, commenting on the matter.
“On the other hand, there were questions about the conduct of the
doctor who treated him. In that context, we had a doubt whether she
concealed information,” she added.
“Therefore,” she said, “I am glad that Duminda Silva’s sister
published the pictures of her brother’s brain surgery. It is a positive
development. We can now ascertain the veracity of the reports before the
country’s judiciary.”
Meanwhile, Duminda Silva’s lawyers were doing groundwork to file an
appeal against the verdict. They will challenge the High Court’s verdict
before the Court of Appeal and seek bail for the former Parliamentarian.
Weerawansa debacle
UPFA Parliamentarian Wimal Weerawansa ran into a trouble when he met
the chief prelate of the Malwatte chapter, Thibbatuwawe Sri Siddartha
Sumangala Thera, last week to discuss about the government’s plans for a
new constitution.
Weerawansa, speaking to the Mahanayake Thera, said the new
constitution was being drafted to fulfill the needs of separatist
elements, including the Tamil National Alliance.
He also said, through the new constitution, the government was trying
to allow foreign judges and prosecutors to examine into war crimes
during the final phase of war.
He urged the Mahanayake Thera to intervene the government’s efforts
to formulate a new constitution, dubbing it as a great threat to the
country’s sovereignty.
It looked as if the Mahanayake Thera did not even take Weerawansa’s
arguments seriously. “The new constitution has not been even drafted
yet,” the Mahanayake Thera said, responding to Weerawansa’s allegations.
“The President and the Prime Minister have reassured, multiple times,
that they would not cause any harm to the country by introducing a new
constitution. So, what’s the point in panicking unnecessarily at this
stage?” the Mahanayake Thera asked. His question, without doubt, put
Weerawansa on the ‘back foot’.
“Apey Hamuduruwane, please look at this matter with an open mind. We
are not trying to create an unnecessary fear over the new constitution,”
Weerawansa told the Mahanayake Thera, in a desperate attempt to save
face.
Mass grave
In his efforts to convince the prelate of the necessity to stop the
current government from changing the Constitution to allow an enquiry
into the final phase of the war, former MP Wimal Weerawansa
inadvertently let slip the location of a mass grave his former bosses -
former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and former Defence Secretary Gotabaya
Rajapaksa – used to bury bodies from the end of the war.
“For example,” the former MP told the devoutly attentive prelate, “a
camp was moved out of Kilinochchi recently…Now that ground was what was
used, during the end of the war, to bury the LTTE. Now there is the
possibility they will dig up this area. The minute they dig it up they
will find thousands of bodies. Who can prove if these are the bodies of
LTTE cadres, or others?”
The former MP said that by moving people out of camps there was the
danger that these mass graves would be unearthed and proof be gathered
to support the accusation that war crimes were committed by the
Rajapaksas at the final stages of the battle with the LTTE.
Weerawansa went on to add hype to the situation by telling the
prelate, Ven. Thibbatuwawe Sri Siddhartha Sumangala Thera, that should
evidence be gathered from this grave to support the accusation that the
Rajapaksas committed war crimes, it would be enough to have the North
separated from the rest of the island - “Much like Serbia and Kosovo.”
“Under the current constitution there is provision for war crimes,”
he said.
“But it is not applicable to the past. What they are doing is
changing the Constitution to allow war crimes to be tried on events from
the past,” before telling the prelate that he was presenting ‘true
facts’ and would in no way ‘even dream of lying.”
However, the Mahanayake Thera did not seem convinced and the entire
exercise bounced back on Weerawansa and his supporters.
Undeterred by the incident, Weearawansa’s party is now preparing to
hold seminars across the country to make the public aware of the
government’s new constitution. |