Attenborough urges 'moral change'
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbb03/cbb03c2b4153ef8d0d698ec0fa34f8180cbc9a53" alt=""
Sir David Attenborough
|
Television naturalist Sir David Attenborough has called for a "moral
change" among energy consumers to cut waste and reduce pollution. He
told the Commons environment committee there was "no question" that
global warming would worsen.
"What we can do is make the situation deteriorate less than it's
going to." Sir David said "a general moral view" that wasting energy was
wrong - such as there had been over wasting food during the Second World
War - was needed.
'Real change' The government-commissioned Stern Review, published in
October, said carbon emissions had already pushed up global temperatures
by half a degree Celsius.
If no action was taken on emissions, there was more than a 75% chance
of global temperatures rising between two and three degrees Celsius over
the next 50 years, it added.
It doesn't matter whether it's a tiny bit or a big bit: it's in the
general attitude to this Sir David Attenborough Sir David, whose series
include Life on Earth, The Blue Planet and Planet Earth, said: "I'm
hopeful that there's a real change taking place in moral attitudes that
it's not to do with saving pennies here and there but it's morally wrong
to waste energy because we are putting at risk our grandchildren."
He added: "People do look at 4x4s in central London and curl a lip
already." Sir David also told MPs: "I grew up during the war and during
the war it was a common view that wasting anything was wrong.
"It wasn't that we thought we were going to defeat Hitler by eating a
lot of gristle in our meat but it was actually wrong not to eat our
food."
There needed to be a similar "general moral view that wasting energy
is wrong", Sir David added. Melting glaciers He said: "Everything we do
goes up there and stays up there for 100 years, in terms of carbon
dioxide. "Therefore it doesn't matter whether it's a tiny bit or a big
bit: it's in the general attitude to this."
Sir David told MPs he had had doubts about climate change until
attending a lecture by a US expert which proved that recent climate
change was man-made, rather than part of the cycle of nature.
Now, he added, he was sure there was "not only climate change but
humanity is responsible for that". Sir David said he had been struck by
the melting of glaciers in the Arctic and Antarctic.
He added: "The big changes that we see are primarily to do with
pollution. "We can see perfectly clearly that there are movements and
increases in distribution of animals coming from warmer parts of
Europe."
Dave Reay, an environmental scientist from Edinburgh University, told
the committee that if people were to move towards more environmentally
friendly behaviour, the information available had to become "personal to
them".
For instance, consumers had to be made aware which cars gave out the
fewest carbon emissions and how much energy could be saved by turning
televisions off at the plug - rather than leaving them on standby. Dr
Reay said: "It's making the message more personal: that's the key."
(Courtesy: BBC NEWS)
|