China, Russia cast rare veto against US on Myanmar
UNITED NATIONS, (Reuters)
China and Russia on Friday vetoed a U.S. resolution calling on
Myanmar's military junta to stop persecution of minority and opposition
groups, killing the measure in the U.N. Security Council.
The vote was 9-3 in favor of the resolution, with three abstentions.
But two of the negative votes came from permanent members with veto
rights.
Both Russia and China, which had not cast a double veto since 1972,
made the point the United States needed to listen to their complaints
carefully. They argued that human rights violations were not the purview
of the Security Council unless they endangered regional or international
peace and security, which Myanmar did not.
"I hope some of our partners also learned some lessons in the course
of this entire process," Russia's U.N. ambassador, Vitaly Churkin, said.
China's envoy, Wang Guangya, told reporters the United States acted like
it was the only permanent council member.
South Africa also voted "no," while Qatar, Indonesia and Congo
Republic abstained. Voting with Washington were Britain, which
co-sponsored the draft, France, Belgium, Italy, Ghana, Peru, Panama and
Slovakia.
To supporters of the failed resolution, pressure from the United
Nations and elsewhere has had little effect on the junta, which
cooperated a bit more with the world body only after the Security
Council put Myanmar on its agenda.
The measure urged Myanmar, formerly Burma, to release all political
prisoners, move toward democracy and stop attacks against minorities,
many of whom are used for forced labor.
"The people of Burma should not feel disheartened by this. This was
an effort to bring the situation to the attention of the world community
and to send a clear signal that we have not forgotten you. And we won't
forget you," Acting U.S. Ambassador Alejandro Wolff told the council.
He argued that refugees were pouring over the border, the trafficking
of people had increased and AIDS was spreading.
Myanmar's U.N. ambassador, Kyaw Tint Swe, said cooperating with the
United Nations was the cornerstone of Myanmar's foreign policy.
Ibrahim Gambari, head of U.N. political affairs, visited Myanmar
twice last year and met with Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, under
house arrest or in prison since her National League for Democracy won
elections in 1990.
"There are many issues that deserve - in fact, demand - the immediate
and undivided attention of the Security Council," he said. "Myanmar by
no stretch of the imagination is among them."
The military has run Myanmar in various forms since 1962 and no one
has denied its abusive policies, which have been condemned by the
192-member General Assembly. At issue was whether the Security Council
had the mandate to deal with the issue rather than the assembly and
other U.N. bodies, whose resolutions carry less weight. "Myanmar must
respond to the imperative of restoring democracy and respect for human
rights - that is a matter of principle," Indonesian Ambassador Rezlan
Ishar Jenie said. "But it is a matter of principle ... whether this
council is the appropriate body to address the problem of Myanmar."
Beijing has only used its veto four times in the past, the last time
in February 1999 on extending a peacekeeping force in Macedonia because
of the Balkan's nation's ties with Taiwan, over which China claims
sovereignty. Russia last used its veto in April 2004 on a Cyprus
resolution for technical reasons.
Britain's U.N. ambassador, Emyr Jones Parry, who co-sponsored the
resolution, told reporters he could look himself in the mirror for
pushing the measure.
"I want tomorrow morning to be able to reassure myself that we did
the right thing, the right thing by the people of Myanmar," he said.
"They have had 50 years of the most abject misery."
|