Awareness and knowledge of new Companies Act vital
by Elmo Leonard
If you wish to interact in the local corporate sphere, then, do what
is vital and acquire an awareness and knowledge of the new Companies
Act, which will come into force shortly.
The new order will contain very important features and will be larger
in content than the running rule, some provisions of which have changed
drastically, Dr. Harsha Cabral PC said. Some of the persons mentioned
below directly involved in the corporate world are architects in framing
the new Companies Act: K Kanag-Isvaran, PC, chairman Company Law
Advisory Commission; Dr. Harsha Cabral; J.M. Swaminathan, Naomal
Goonewardena and Suren Rajakarier.
The local branch of The Institute of Chartered Secretaries and
Administration (ICSA) International held a seminar on the new company
law last week, attended largely by secretaries and directors of
corporates. ICSA UK is the only professional examining body of chartered
secretaries. It is the sole regulatory body which governs and lays down
professional guidelines in corporate secretaryship.
The current corporate law is based on the English law of 1848. At
that time, company directors in England were considered honourable
gentlemen who did what was best for their corporates and the country at
large. They were thus not challenged in court, it was explained to
participants. In time, many amendments were brought into the English
law.
At that time corporates in USA were growing and there was a diversion
from the English norm. In time, the services of a Canadian expert on the
subject, L.C.D. Gower was sought. Gower took into consideration the
shareholder. In time, changes in company law took place in New Zealand,
Australia and other parts of the world which have had bearings in the
company laws applying in different countries.
It is the duty of directors to act in good faith, was one of the
aspects taken up by Dr. Cabral. He must do what he believes is in the
interest of the company. He can also act in the interest of a subsidiary
company, he is not a director.
A director of a company shall not act in any manner reckless or
grossly negligent, expected of a person of his knowledge and experience.
An attorney-at-law on a board cannot be heard to say that he did not
know the law.
A director can rely on information and advice, on disciplines he is
not versed in. However, such reliance is subject to the director in
question acting in good faith, making proper inquiries if necessary and
has no knowledge that such reliance is unwarranted, Dr. Cabral said.
Some new aspects bought out by Naomal Goonewardena include:
* There will be no nominal or par value on the share
* The consideration on the issue of shares has to be reasonable to
the company and to all existing shareholders.
* The consideration for which a share is issued may take any form
including cash, promissory notes, future services, property of any kind
or other securities of the company
* Rights of pre-emption on new issues of shares which ran pari passu
or above existing shares recognised.
At the panel discussion it was made out that the compulsory payment
of a dividend in accordance with profits earned by the company,
following the budget, could be further completed, with the new law
coming into force.
[email protected]
|