When a leader missteps a world can go astray
A second chance :
In the months before the American invasion of Iraq, Zbigniew
Brzezinski, former national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter,
was one of the few members of the foreign policy establishment (along
with Brent Scowcroft, former national security adviser to President
George H. W. Bush) to speak out strongly about the dangers of going to
war unilaterally against Saddam Hussein, and to warn, presciently it
turns out, of the possibly dire consequences of doing so without a
larger strategic plan.

Zbigniew Brzezinski
|
In August 2002, as the current Bush administration was already
hurrying toward an invasion, Mr. Brzezinski cautioned that war "is too
serious a business and too unpredictable in its dynamic consequences
especially in a highly flammable region to be undertaken because of a
personal peeve, demagogically articulated fears or vague factual
assertions."
In February 2003, just weeks before the invasion, he added that "an
America that decides to act essentially on its own regarding Iraq" could
"find itself quite alone in having to cope with the costs and burdens of
the war's aftermath, not to mention widespread and rising hostility
abroad."
In his compelling new book, "Second Chance: Three Presidents and the
Crisis of American Superpower," Mr. Brzezinski not only assesses the
short- and long-term fallout of the Iraq war, but also puts that grim
situation in perspective with the tumultuous global changes that have
taken place in the last two decades.
He dispassionately analyzes American foreign policy as conducted by
the last three presidents George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George H. W.
Bush and he gives the reader a sobering analysis of where these leaders'
cumulative decisions have left the United States as it now searches for
an exit strategy from Iraq, faces potentially explosive situations in
Iran and North Korea and copes with an increasingly alienated Europe and
an increasingly assertive China.
"Second Chance" is, in some respects, a continuation of the author's
earlier books "The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership"
(2004) and "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Imperatives" (1997), which examined the responsibilities and perils of
global leadership facing America as the one superpower in a
post-cold-war world.
As in those books, Mr. Brzezinski employs a brisk, no-nonsense style
here, using his erudition in history and foreign policy to lay out his
views succinctly.
A confirmed realist (a school of thinking willfully dismissed by the
idealists and ideological hawks in the current Bush administration), the
author writes with a keen understanding of the ways in which military or
political actions in one part of the world can affect developments in
another region, as well as a shrewd appreciation of the fallout of a
global zeitgeist that is increasingly anti-imperialist, anti-Western and
anti-American.
What this book does most strikingly is remind the reader just how
drastically things have changed since the fall of the Berlin Wall in
1989 and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union.
At that point, Mr. Brzezinski writes, America was "globally admired"
and "faced no peer, no rival, no threat, neither on the Western front
nor the Eastern front, nor on the Southern fronts of the great cold war
that had been waged for several decades on the massive Eurasian
chessboard."
This precarious situation, Mr. Brzezinski says, means that "it will
take years of deliberate effort and genuine skill to restore America's
political credibility and legitimacy," placing enormous importance on
the diplomatic and strategic skills of the next president "to fashion a
truly post-cold-war globalist foreign policy."
"Nothing could be worse for America, and eventually the world," he
writes at the end of this unsparing volume.
NYTIMES
|