Approach to mental disorders down the ages
by Nagalingam Kumarakuruparan
The recent massacre at New-town, Connecticut USA, where 20 children
and six adults in an elementary school were killed by a youth with an
assault rifle had shocked the world. Was this person suffering from any
mental disorders? Was he a neurotic? And if so, then what is the
essential difference between a neurotic person and a normal person? Is
this condition a disease? Is it curable? Can modern day psychiatry
answer the questions? What is the responsibility of a psychiatrist?
The task which concerns the psychiatrist today is one whose roots are
spread more widely than the foundations of medicine or even pure
science; yet from the time of Hippocrates onwards it has been the
combination of scientific and objective study with a sincere interest in
human beings as a whole which has led to the greatest advances and the
most sure methods in the practice of psychological medicine or
psychiatry.
The concept of normality is in fact fundamental to any study of the
abnormal; and yet when we examine the concept we see that there are more
ways than one of forming a judgement of what is normal in any field
which we agree to survey.
Our field here is the study of human personality and the scientific
basis for this. The theory and application of the science of human
behaviour and experience is called normal psychology. It bears the same
relationship to psychiatry as physiology bears to general medicine and
surgery.
Greek civilisation
Even before the blossoming of Greek civilisation, with its medical
tradition which has survived to this day, there is abundant evidence of
attempts to understand and treat mental illness the medical system of
ancient India, whose records are to be found in the literary heritage of
the Vedas as well as in other well-known treatises, included not only
the belief in demoniacal possession as a basic cause of mental
disturbance, but also the views of Susruta which even today remain in
advance of much of contemporary medical thought.
About a hundred years later in another and seemingly separate
civilisation, the ideas were to appear in the writings of Hippocrates.
Some strikingly similar to the more mystical speculation of the Indian
philosophers although not including the conception of the transmigration
of souls, characterised the later works of Plato and his pupil
Aristotle.
But while Plato and Aristotle were philosophers and their interest in
psychology was traditional and scholastic, Hippocrates was essentially a
physician and a practising clinician at that.
History of medicine
If we look into the history of medicine, in contrast to the
relatively smooth and sure development of medicine in the sphere of
tangible physical disorder, the story of affliction of the mind and
personality is indeed appalling charred with countless burning at the
stake, chequered with violence, cruelty and remorseless persecution and
dark not only with the gloom of ignorance and superstition, but also
with the despair of unlit solitary cell, stocks, bars, chains and brands
and all the sickening paraphernalia of torture.
Why should this be so? There is an echo of this attitude to mental
illness in the heart of everyone of us.
However, little we may care or be able to acknowledge it, but before
we can understand it better we shall need to examine as honestly and
objectively as possible something of the problem of mental illness
itself. Words are important here.
We object to the very terms 'mental illness' or mentally ill people,
preferring the more robust and traditional 'madness,' 'lunacy,' 'madmen'
and 'lunatics.' For these older words carry with them strong and in some
ways more satisfying emotional charge of contempt or horror or derision
or at least condescension, according to the way they are used.
They have acquired this emotional flavour from the time when such a
constellation of feelings was almost universal among some people towards
those less fortunate than themselves.
Attitude
Our attitude towards insanity is fundamentally one of contempt of
rejection of the lunatic as someone essentially separated from us, with
whom we desire as little contact and for whom we acknowledge as little
responsibility as possible or whether we can accept his plight as an
illness and him as a sickman with a claim upon our sympathies. The basis
of the distinction is, therefore, an emotional one; and this in turn
will govern our choice of words. But this does not end with the choice
of words.
The subject we have to examine includes the whole range of
disturbance of human emotion, judgement, action and personality.
Mental illness
Whenever this disturbance is sufficiently profound to be considered
abnormal, this range will extend from excessive anxiety, tension,
unhappiness, fear or confusion without apparent cause at one end to the
most bizzare forms of insanity.
At the other, somewhere along it must be found a place for simple
failure of mental development, failure to meet the requirements of
society, sheer personal inadequacy and the various short lived but
violent disturbances known as deliria; It must also include some other
disturbances of consciousness and memory whether due to structural
disease or damage to the brain or not. This aspect of human suffering in
all its manifestations we shall call mental illness.
It is with all this that the psychiatrist of today is concerned.
We must now turn back for a moment and remind ourselves that our
first object in examining the study of mental illness and its treatment
was to gain an understanding of its history in which, violence has
played so tragic a part, while the more decent and humane aspects of
medicine have been all too often eclipsed despite the isolated efforts
of outstanding individuals throughout the centuries.
Hippocrates recognised the importance of the brain as an organ of
mind, he sought a physiological explanation of the various temperaments,
moods and emotional disorders he encountered in his patients and he
attacked vigorously the conception of divinely ordained and therefore
unalterable illness.
Hippocrates
Hippocrates, the physician and founder of objective and empirical
medical thought was far from being a materialist in the modern sense of
the word.
Many hundred years later, before the dark ages closed on medicine
there was to be one final torch blazing against the deepening shadows.
This was the contribution of the physician galen. Modern medical
historian Gregory Zil Boorg sums up the achievement of Galen by saying
that while he contributed nothing new to either the therapy or the
clinical description of mental diseases his total contribution was
monumental. His remarks that whereas political historians divide ancient
history from the medieval period by emphasising the decisive invasion of
Rome by the Barbarians in the latter part of the fifth century, the dark
ages in medical history began with the death of Galen in 200AD.
In the history of medical psychology during the period which lasted
roughly from AD200 until the latter part of the 18th century in Europe
thousands were put to death because of the wrong understanding of
insanity.
The blame for it was placed at the doorstep of the universal Church
of Rome. It was blamed for a great deal of the cruelty, intolerance,
persecution and terror of the times. Indeed there were no shortage of
teachers and scholars who could quote the scriptures in support of many
of the terrible things which were done. To seek out and kill mentally
abnormal people in the belief that they were witches or inhabited by
devils came to be regarded as a religious duty.
The intolerance and persecutory fervour which gripped the Middle Ages
was consistent not truly with religion but with the recurring pattern of
a totalitarian orthodoxy which bears the same sickening and horrifying
characteristics whenever it is seen throughout history, and whatever the
creed around which it is constructed. There are always the sincere
fanatics who elevate absolute conformity above individual worth or
dignity of man; and for their henchmen, willing bullies and torturers
are never found wanting.
The first formal execution of a witch took place in Europe somewhere
about AD430. How many hundreds of thousands were to follow will never be
known. Before the reformation period the principal authority for the
entire practice of the persecution of the insane or neurotic was a
treatise by two monks, Henry Kramer and James Sprenger entitled 'Molleus
Maleficarum' - the witches hammer.
They had been entrusted by Pope Innocent VIII with the duty of
preparing this treatise so that the believers' kingdom might be purged
of a tremendous invasion by demons, witches and the like. The Pope had
issued a bull on December 9, 1484 appointing them supreme inquisitors,
empowered both to inspect the existing arrangements for controlling
heresy and witchcraft and to advise upon the improvement. The Malleus
has been described by latter day historians as so insane, so raw and
cruel and leading to such terrible conclusions, that never before or
since did such a combination of horrible characteristics flow from human
pen.
Johann Weyer was the greatest contributor to psychiatry in the
renaissance period. He took great pains to describe the various types of
delusion and disturbances of behaviour which he had seen among patients.
A return to the Hippocratic objectivity led to further attempts to
find empirical means of treating mental illness. This laid the
foundation for the modern psychiatry the world has come to know. The
up-to-date knowledge of the problems of mental illness and abnormality
their causes and treatment.
Will the UN make a difference in Haiti?
by Kevin Edmonds
On December 11, the United Nations announced a long overdue
initiative to end the cholera epidemic which has devastated Haiti for
more than two years - taking over 7,750 lives and infecting 600,000
more. While the announcement by the Secretary General Ban Ki moon is a
welcome and much needed step, the ten-year plan is not without
controversy.

The UN’s latest new initiative to tackle the cholera epidemic in
Haiti is underfunded while it continued to refuse to take any
responsibility for its role in causing the problem. |
Perhaps most practically, the Initiative for the Elimination of
Cholera in the Island of Hispaniola remains largely unfunded. Of the
$2.2 billion price tag, only $238.5 million has been committed.
The initiative seeks to implement clean water and sanitation
infrastructure in addition to public education and capacity building
programs throughout both Haiti and the Dominican Republic. When pressed
about the lack of funding, Nigel Fisher, the UN Resident and
Humanitarian Coordinator for Haiti could only state that "I'm confident
that more resources will come".
Given that the only half of the $12 billion in pledges for the 2010
earthquake reconstruction effort have materialised or that a $30 million
emergency request made earlier in the year only raised one-third of the
intended amount, Fisher's words do not inspire a great deal of
confidence that more money is on the way.
Of the funds that did make it to Haiti after the earthquake, only 10
percent was directed towards government programs and public
infrastructure.
Mark Weisbrot, Co-Director of the Centre for Economic and Policy
Research, stated that "It is unclear where the money for this is going
to come from, and whether the international community, which has
chronically underfunded responses to disasters in Haiti, will treat this
any differently, and actually put up the cash to stop needless deaths."
In addition, Weisbrot put forward a practical solution in order to
fund the initiative - by redirecting the money away from the highly
controversial and unnecessary United Nations Stabilisation Mission in
Haiti (MINUSTAH).
While the Secretary General made no mention of this, negligent
screening protocols and sanitation practices introduced the cholera
outbreak into Haiti.
This has been proven through various independent scientific studies,
the Center for Disease Control, and numerous high level UN staff such as
Bill Clinton, and Dr. Danielle Lantagne, top U.S. cholera expert hired
by the UN In October, Dr. Lantagne said "We can now say that the most
likely source of the introduction of cholera into Haiti was someone
infected with the Nepal strain of cholera and associated with the United
Nations Mirabalais camp."
Weisbrot added that "There is no conflict there. The Mission's $676
million budget should be spent instead on eliminating cholera."
This view has also been widely echoed in Haiti. MINUSTAH is widely
considered to be a destabilising occupying force, and given their
consistent human rights violations, they are not popular with either the
Haitian people or the politicians.
A February Security Council Report argued that Haitian
"Parliamentarians shared frank and mostly critical views on MINUSTAH.
They called for the mission to compensate cholera victims and to swiftly
punish those within MINUSTAH responsible for incidents of sexual
exploitation and abuse of Haitians."
A January survey revealed that a large percentage of respondents
believed that MINUSTAH troops are or have been engaged in criminal
activities such as violence, theft and rape.
At his last address to the United Nations Security Council in April
2011, former President Rene Preval said that the dangers of violent
confrontation in Haiti were over and that "peacekeeping operations did
not quickly enough adapt to the new situation" - and as such, tanks
should be replaced by bulldozers.
-Third World Network Features
Motivation, study habits determine growth in maths achievement
It's not how smart students are but how motivated they are and how
they study that determines their growth in mathematics achievement.
That's the main finding of a new study that appears in the journal Child
Development.
"While intelligence as assessed by IQ tests is important in the early
stages of developing mathematical competence, motivation and study
skills play a more important role in students' subsequent growth,"
according to Kou Murayama, post-doctoral researcher of psychology at the
University of California, Los Angeles (who was at the University of
Munich when he led the study).
Murayama and colleagues looked at six annual waves of data from a
German longitudinal study assessing math ability in 3,520 students in
grades 5 to 10. They investigated how students' motivation, study
skills, and intelligence jointly predicted long-term growth in their
mathematics achievement over five years.
Intelligence was strongly linked to students' mathematics
achievement, but only in the initial development of competence in the
subject.
Motivation and study skills turned out to be more important factors
in terms of students' growth (their learning curve or ability to learn)
in mathematics. Students who felt competent; were intrinsically
motivated; used skills like summarising, explaining, and making
connections to other materials; and avoided rote learning showed more
growth in mathematics achievement than those who didn't. In contrast,
students' intelligence had no relation to growth in mathematics
achievement.
- MNT
Toddlers' language skills predict less anger by preschool
Toddlers with more developed language skills are better able to
manage frustration and less likely to express anger by the time they're
in preschool. That's the conclusion of a new longitudinal study from
researchers that appears in the journal Child Development.
"This is the first longitudinal evidence of early language abilities
predicting later aspects of anger regulation," according to Pamela M.
Cole, liberal arts research professor of psychology at Pennsylvania
State University, who was the principal investigator of the study.
Angry outbursts such as temper tantrums are common among toddlers,
but by the time children enter school, they're expected to have more
self-control. To help them acquire this skill, they're taught to use
language skills like "using your words." This study sought to determine
whether developing language skills relates to developing anger control.
Does developing language ability reduce anger between ages 2 and 4?
Researchers looked at 120 predominantly White children from families
above poverty but below middle income from the time they were 18 months
to 48 months. Through home and lab visits, they measured children's
language and their ability to cope with tasks that might elicit
frustration.
In one lab-based task, children were asked to wait 8 minutes before
opening a gift while their mothers finished "work" (a series of
questions about how the child usually coped with waiting).
- MNT
|