Loss of innocence caused by social media a rash assumption |
Why fret over Facebook?
By Kalakeerthi Edwin Ariyadasa
“The key to
helping youth navigate contemporary digital life isn’t more
restrictions.
It’s freedom -
plus communication. What makes the digital street safe is when teens and
adults collectively agree to open their eyes and pay attention,
communicate and collaboratively negotiate difficult situations...”
- Dr. Danah Boyd.
To begin with, this is not at all a self-pleasing ego-excursion. I
need to aver, with all the earnestness I can muster, that my
preoccupation here, is to raise the alarm.
This urge is brought on by a series of soul-searing tragedies that
have deeply scarred the collective soul of the Sri Lankans.
The self-imposed deaths of a number of our innocent children in the
recent past, have devastated the totality of our national conscience.
Implicit in this gloomy and sorrow fraught episode, there is a facet,
that should alarm us all, as a nation. Some irresponsible and
thoughtless people almost cynically and casually attribute the cause of
this profoundly moving catastrophe, to external influences.
Perspective
But, if we adopted the right perspective, we would be pointing an
accusing finger at our own selves.
To be specific there are some who attempt to place the blame for this
unhappy episode, on social media - Facebook being the most prominent
among them.
On the other hand, such a rash assumption is not quite warranted.
When the communication and media landscape at global level, was
undergoing change at a surprising clip, we were not quite prepared to
absorb these vast and fast fluctuations.
Many of the elitist intellectual leaders in our land did not fully
appreciate that the future will come at us, with this swiftness. They
were not ready for it.
They did not heed the compelling words of media sages and prophets.
The greatest communication seer of our age - Arthur C. Clarke resided
among us.
Facebook now has over 140 billion recorded friendships |
The God-father of the communication satellite forecast, as far back
as 1970, that someday, satellites would bring the accumulated knowledge
of the world to our fingertips.
Prophets
The domestic prophet’s earth - shaking prophecies did not awaken most
of us to this dramatic future.
In the same year futurist author Alvin Toffler, presented his
impactful work Future Shock, to the moderns, to prepare them to what was
in the offing.
At numerous academic lectures, seminar presentations, group
discussions and related events, I kept on speaking about Toffler’s
Future Shock. I was keen to drive home to those who listened, that if we
are not adequately prepared to meet what was coming, we will suffer a
Future Shock.
I am not being wise after the event. Nor am I keen to derive an
unseemly delight, with a cynical “Didn’t I say so.”
Way back, in November 6, 2010, the “inaugural meeting to launch the
data-bank for the Diploma Holders of the Journalists Course at the
University of Colombo,” was held (of all places) in the canteen of the
Sri Lanka Foundation Institution unlikely meeting place was arranged at
very short notice, by the academic in-charge of the Diploma Course at
the time - Kamal Waleboda. The quick shift of venue was a tribute to his
enterprising thinking.)
At that assembly, I presented to Media Minister Keheliya Rambukwella,
the chief guest, a report of suicides of teenagers, who were the victims
of social-media hectoring. The minister was moved.
I have been alert to the urgent need to prevent a future shock, to
avoid grief and tragedy and to derive the vast benefits offered by
Facebook, Twitter et al.
Today Mark Zuckarberg’s Facebook realism has burgeoned into a
relationship-based databank of at least 140 billion recorded
friendships. (Report dated 8/15 July 2013).
On the 10th anniversary of Facebook - in January M.Z. was quoted as
saying, “Facebook was started not just to be a company but to fulfil a
vision of connecting the world.”
WWW (the world wide web) came into being just 25 years ago, (March
12, 1989) through a proposal written by Tim Berners - Lee who felt that
his idea could be implemented throughout the world.”
Today the number of websites exceeds 600 million. The search volume
per day is over three billion.
Given such a world of mind-boggling information and multi-million of
friendships, one can imagine how bewildered users would be if they are
not fully disciplined in the ethic of their utilisation.
Evolution of Facebook |
It is here that we should once again consider the imperative of
self-searching.
What have we done in any substantial way to prevent the innocent
children of our land falling victim to these massive digital oceans,
when they try to swim there without the proper discipline and the right
mechanism to absorb the treasures they can offer.
In a praiseworthy public pronouncement, President Mahinda Rajapaksa,
insisted on the need to attune the users to the rigid discipline
essential to enrich from the universe of knowledge the social media are
ready to offer-mostly free.
“Futurism” should become a compulsory area in all the institutions of
Sri Lanka’s educational system.
I heard that in an extremely remote area in Sri Lanka, Dambane,
students from relatively underprivileged social backgrounds, derive
extensive benefits from the Internet and social media, as they have
received the proper guidance and due discipline, in the utilisation of
knowledge machines.
Imputing the fault on external influences, is not at all the right
way to do so. In the immediate slip-stream of the tragic losses of
children’s lives, an immediate national policy has to be implemented to
prevent a “culture shock” and litanies of tragic outcomes.
Discipline - the key
This is how, supreme spiritual leader the Dalai Lama responded to the
crucial question, “Do Facebook and Twitter help or hurt our happiness?”
“It depends on how you use them. If the person himself has a certain
inner strength, a certain confidence, then it is no problem.
But if a person’s mind is weak, then there is more confusion. You
can’t blame technology.
It depends on the user of technology.” This gem was elicited by a
question posed by Elizabeth Dias to Dalai Lama.
This is a holy mantram to chant in the face of any troubling issue,
from the myriad of social media of our day. |