Battle to curb 'vulture funds'
Many countries face
a worsening debt situation compelling an urgency to set up a global debt
restructuring mechanism.
by Martin Khor
External debt is rearing its ugly head again. Many developing
countries face reduced export earnings and foreign reserves.
No country would like to have to seek the help of the International
Monetary Fund to avoid default.
That could lead to years of austerity and high unemployment, and at
the end of it, the debt stock might even get worse.
Low growth, recession, social and political turmoil are probable.
This has been experienced by many African and Latin American countries
in the past, and by several European countries presently. When no
solution is found, some countries then restructure their debts. Since
there is no international system for an orderly debt workout, the
country would have to take its own initiative.
The results are usually messy, as it faces a loss of market
reputation and the creditors' anger. But the country swallows the pill,
rather than have more turmoil at home.
Hedge funds
Such was the experience of Argentina, whose public debt reached 166%
of GDP in 2002. After many years of decline and political instability,
Argentina defaulted in 2001.
Argentina then arranged for two debt swaps in 2005 and 2010, thus
restructuring its debt with 93% of its creditors, who agreed to receive
about a third of the original debt value. But 7% of creditors, known as
'holdouts', did not agree to the restructuring.
A few influential hedge funds (comprising only 1% of creditors) which
had bought some of the debt very cheaply on the secondary market, sought
a court order in New York (where the original loans had been contracted)
to be paid in full.
There are several such funds, now popularly termed 'vulture funds',
that specialise in buying distressed debt at low prices (say, 10% of the
original loan value) and then insist through the courts on being paid in
full with interest.
Like vultures, they circle overhead and swoop to make a meal of the
dead or dying bodies.
Only in this case the bodies are countries and they are asked to
squeeze their shrivelled economies further to pay the vulture funds,
like drawing blood from a stone.
Discount
The United States judiciary, after a long process that went to the
Supreme Court, decided a few months ago that the holdout hedge funds
that took up the case should indeed be paid in full, and with interest.
Further, it decreed that the 93% of creditors who had already agreed
to be paid at a big discount, are now not allowed to be paid, unless the
vulture funds are paid in full at the same time.
The New York judge used the principle of pari passu (that all
creditors should be treated the same) in reaching the decision.
Argentina had already arranged with a bank in New York to pay out
interest to the 93% a few weeks ago, but the bank refused to do so, due
to the court order. The vulture funds want their pound of flesh. The
main fund, NML Capital, would make an estimated 1,600%
profit.Argentina's President Cristina Kirchner refused to bow to these
funds. If she did, the country might have to also repay all the
creditors the full value, which is US$120bil, and that is impossible to
do.
This incredible turn of events has caused outrage among many public
interest groups and anger among developing countries' governments.
Debt restructuring
The South Summit of the G77 in May in Bolivia criticised the vulture
funds and called for a proper global debt restructuring mechanism.
Finance ministries of developed countries have been concerned as well as
they are also affected. Greece also went through debt restructuring, in
which private creditors agreed to take a loss, a few years ago.
Accepting the court decision as the new template would make it quite
impossible for any country to restructure their debts, since the now
emboldened vulture funds would pounce and block it.Influential
'Financial Times' commentator Martin Wolf has supported Argentina in its
battle with the vulture funds.
Wolf even went so far as saying that it is unfair to the real
vultures to name the holdouts as such since at least the real vultures
perform a valuable task!
At the end of August, the Swiss-based International Capital Market
Association, a group of bankers and investors, issued new standards
aimed at reducing the ability of holdout investors to undermine debt
restructuring.
Legal framework
Last week, the Group of 77, representing developing countries,
succeeded in promoting a resolution at the United Nations General
Assembly which recognised that a state's efforts to restructure debt
should not be impeded by hedge funds that seek to profit from distressed
debt.
The General Assembly, by a vote of 124 in favour, 11 against and 41
abstentions, also decided to set up a multilateral legal framework for
sovereign debt restructuring by the end of 2014, to increase the
stability of the international financial system.An international debt
restructuring mechanism will be a systemic solution, since countries
with debt crises can have recourse to an international court or system
and need not do a messy debt restructuring on its own.
There will now be an uphill battle to get the resolution implemented,
since the US, Germany and Britain (all key countries in global finance),
were among those which objected.Another resolution, initiated by
Argentina, is now being considered by the UN Human Rights Council, aimed
at setting up legal frameworks to curtail vulture funds' activities and
for sovereign debt restructuring. One good thing is that the UN, which
is a universal body in which developing countries have a greater say in
decision-making, is now at the centre of the debt discussion.The
negotiations ahead will be tough but well worth it since preventing and
managing a debt crisis is now a priority for a growing number of
countries.
- Third World Network Features.
|