Hosni Mubarak trial: Egypt Judge to deliver verdict
2, June, BBC
Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak is due to learn if he has
been found guilty of conspiracy in the killing of protesters during last
year's uprising.A court in Cairo will decide whether Mr Mubarak, as well
as his former Interior Minister Habib al-Adly and four aides, ordered
police to shoot demonstrators.All six deny the charges. They could face
the death penalty if convicted.
Mr Mubarak also faces separate charges of abusing his powers to amass
wealth, with his sons Alaa and Gamal.An associate, the tycoon Hussein
Salem, is being tried in absentia.Two other senior interior ministry
security officials are accused of failing to anticipate protests and
protect public and private property.Hosni Mubarak is the first former
leader to be tried in person since the start of the Arab Spring
uprisings last year.Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali of Tunisia was found guilty
in absentia of drugs and gun charges in July, while Yemen's Ali Abdullah
Saleh received immunity from prosecution after handing over power in
November. Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was killed by rebels in October.
Last May, Egypt's prosecutor general declared that Mr Mubarak would
stand trial for conspiracy in the killing of about 850 unarmed
protesters during the 18-day uprising that forced him to step down in
February.
He was also charged with using his position to enrich himself.In
August, Mr Mubarak was wheeled into a courtroom on a stretcher, because
he had reportedly been suffering heart problems.The prosecution
experienced difficulties from the start, with none of its witnesses
providing damning statements.
The first five recanted their initial statements that police
commanders had been ordered to use live ammunition.Field Marshal
Mohammed Hussein Tantawi, the head of Egypt's ruling Supreme Council of
the Armed Forces (Scaf) and former defence minister, reportedly
testified in secret that the army had never been instructed to shoot
demonstrators.
The trial was suspended from September to December because of a
complaint - later dismissed - that the judge was biased.
In the final stage of the trial in early January, the chief
prosecutor argued that it was impossible that Mr Mubarak had not ordered
police to use deadly force.The defence argued that the military had been
in charge of security when the protesters were killed because the former
president had imposed a curfew and transferred responsibility to the
chief-of-staff. Police, therefore, could not have received orders from
the defendants, their lawyers said.The prosecutor called for the
84-year-old to be hanged.
Correspondents say that although most observers believe the trial has
been conducted relatively fairly, the prosecution maintains it has been
denied access to some of the most important evidence.
The court has not heard logs of calls from the interior ministry in
the crucial hours when many of the protesters were killed, prosecutors
say, and many key insiders have not given evidence while others have
only appeared behind closed doors.
Mr Mubarak was also accused of having helped Hussein Salem siphon
$714m (£464m) in public money out of a deal to sell natural gas to
Israel.
He is also alleged to have allowed a company owned by Mr Salem buy
government-owned land on the Red Sea coast at a discounted price in
return for five villas worth $6.7m.Alaa and Gamal Mubarak are accused of
accepting bribes from Mr Salem, 79, who is currently awaiting
extradition from Spain.On Wednesday, prosecutors said the younger
Mubaraks would also go on trial with seven others on charges of stock
market manipulation.
The defendants allegedly made illicit gains from the sale of a bank.
|