Anti-smoking publicity gathers momentum
By Amal Hewavissenti
May 31 was the day that primarily underlined the need to mount a
protest against smoking. The fundamental message is that it is vitally
important to cancel out the huge but life threatening publicity campaign
outright associated with smoking.
It is suggested that publicity in any form, visual promotion of
smoking and the sponsorship offered by tobacco companies for varied
projects should be banned downright. This proposal to call a halt to the
publicity campaigns for smoking has thus become the basic theme, rather
motto for the year 2013. The proposal has become increasingly
exceptional and remarkable because the Ministry of Health has insisted
on displaying graphic warnings on a larger section of the package of
cigarettes.
However, tobacco companies show a negative response to the Ministry's
regulation that a packet must display pictorial warnings, pictures which
expose serious injuries or damage caused by smoking.
These picture warnings impress themselves hard into the mind of the
smoker and do much to prevent serious addiction. Experiments with these
'publicity campaigns against smoking' have showed that pictures on
packets showing the harm caused by continued smoking have effectively
influenced public attitude.
Psychologically this method is successful. A person smoking a few
cigarettes does not usually discard the package until it is emptied.
Every time he takes out a cigarette from the packet, his eye may be
engaged by the pictures on it and the obsessions of harm may ultimately
develop in him an aversion to smoking.
Publicity
The sale of cigarettes invariably depends on direct and indirect
propaganda. Usually cigarettes and smoking receive generous publicity
through media such as websites, radio, television and newspapers. Owing
to the repeated censorship over advertisements and programs related to
smoking and tobacco products there is now less scope of popularising the
habit.
On the other hand, the manufacturers of tobacco products sometimes
involve themselves in social welfare programs and find ways to
indirectly popularise tobacco products and smoking.
They exploit the image of popular sportsmen, film stars and men of
celebrity who are seen smoking the best brands. When popular figures are
seen smoking, the average smoker is forced to compare his image with
that of the film stars and sports stars. Thus, the company owners
endeavour to convince the youth that "smoking is an in thing" among the
superior class of men for instance, beautiful women, sports stars and
film stars.
In Sri Lanka, the National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol has
proposed some sensational pictures with powerful captions to be printed
over a larger area on the packet.
These graphics or pictures represent the serious damage and the
people severely afflicted with smoking. The pictures appeal to the more
emotional.
It is important to note that these graphics have been designed to
generate a psychological trend against smoking and tobacco products on
the whole.
One such graphic shows a figure of a dead infant under the caption
"Your Cigar kills me". The picture issued by the National Authority on
Tobacco and Alcohol further suggests to the viewer that he should avoid
smoking for the direct benefit of his own children ("Our own children"
to be more specific).
The authority warns that smoking in public places may invite severe
punishment which may be a fine or imprisonment or both.
The graphic titled "Smoking causes cancer" shows a dissection of oral
cancer and suggests to the viewer that he should avoid smoking for the
benefit of his family.
Another pictorial warning suggested for the packet of cigarettes
shows the image of a heart patient under treatment with the message
"Smoking causes heart diseases". Thus, the Authority on Tobacco and
Alcohol has proposed sensational images and photo graphs together with
captions of emotive language to be printed on the packets of cigarettes.
The government expectation is to include pictorial warnings to spread
over eighty percent of the face of the packet. The Gazette notification
regarding this rule was issued on August 8, 2012 but the manufacturers
of cigarettes are vehemently against the rule. But it is a good trend on
the part of the Ministry of Health.
It is obvious that large and clear warnings against smoking and
building up public opinion will pave the way for averting this national
catastrophe. The larger does the space of the visual warning appear on
the packet, the greater is the trend for nonsmoking.
Sensational
At the same time a verbal warning should accompany sensational
pictures or photographs which are naturally capable of impressing
powerful feelings on the minds of smokers or even strong addicts.
The Sri Lankan authorities concerned have realised that pictorial
warning is much more effective and powerful than a warning that involves
words alone. In this regard they have realised that pictures displaying
damaged human organs and human suffering are sure to produce a
tremendous effect on the smoker or the viewer.
However, it is now discovered that the "warning pictures" on the
packet of cigarettes are greatly conducive to a considerable number of
people to quit smoking.
The percentage of persons dropping out from smoking is proved to rise
up to the degree of the size of the pictorial warning.In whatever way,
the world must witness the total destruction not only of the publicity
campaign for smoking but also the habit of smoking that gradually preys
on the lives of the youth.
The only country in the world which has succeeded in banning tobacco
cultivation, import, manufacturing and sale of cigarettes Bhutan.
They have taken a drastic action against smoking because an
unprecedented number of people has succumbed to damage caused from
cancer and heart disease.
Finally it is sensible to remember that we should burn away a
cigarette before the cigarette burns us. And cancelling out any form of
publicity for smoking is as important as avoiding smoking. This is the
basic theme, the message of 2013. |