Commonwealth Games bid organising committee expresses gratitude to
all who supported it
The Organizing Committee (OC )for the Hambantota Bid for the
Commonwealth Games in 2018, gratefully acknowledges the support and
encouragement of 27 nations who voted in favour of the City of
Hambantota's bid to host the Commonwealth Games in 2018.
The OC also express its appreciation of the support rendered by a
vast number of organizations, corporates and individuals who supported
the bid in numerous ways. Although the bid did not achieve the desired
objective of winning the rights to host the 2018 Games, the bid created
a significant tangible and intangible positive impression about Sri
Lanka. In particular, it displayed the country's ability to formulate
and carry through a complex concept, successfully. It also inspired the
nation and improved the country's rehabilitation and reconciliation
process. Further, it served to show-case and fine-tune the country's
ambitious 7 year plan to develop sports in the country.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0b42/d0b423b4959e2822b4090055ecce33605769c760" alt=""
Co-chairman of the Hambantota Bid for the Commonwealth Games
in 2018 Ajith Nivard Cabraal |
In fact, such outcomes prompted the Commonwealth Games Federation
(CGF) to describe the competition between Hambantota and Gold Coast as
one of the most exciting contests in its history, stating:"Hambantota
2018 was unable to tip the balance in its favour, but for the unified
nation and its 20 million people, the process of bidding for the Games
itself will see history in the making".
The positive attributes of the bid also helped to develop Sri Lanka's
vision and plan for the new Information Technologycum University City in
Hambantota, which plan was further improved and refined through the
close scrutiny of the plan by the CGF Evaluation Commission. In
addition, Sri Lanka's tourism received a significant boost because of
the positive worldwide publicity that the country received as a result
of the bid. The bid also enhanced the credibility of the country, as a
result of the many favourable endorsements it received from a large
number of sporting economic and political personalities from across the
world.
Towards realizing these major benefits, the Sri Lankan Government's
investment has been around a modest US$ 1million only, with the balance
investment in the Bid of around US$ 7 million, having been contributed
and committed by the private sector, who undoubtedly realized and
appreciated the widespread macro benefits that would arise from such a
bidding process.
In that context, it would also be noted that the Bid demonstrated a
successful private public partnership which could perhaps be a model for
other similar projects as well. The private sector participation ranged
from direct financial contributions to discounted and gratis services
such as architectural,management, accounting, accommodation, travel,
etc.,to logistical, IT, telecom services, as well as to the direct
participation at the many events connected with the bid. The private
sector's contribution was particularly strong during the final election
phase at St. Kitts and Nevis, where, a large number of private sector
business leaders physically participated, together with several of the
country's top media persons, sports persons, celebrities,
entertainers,musicians, and highly qualified and experienced culinary
artists.
The final thrust at St. Kitts was led by, the Minister of Sports,
Mahindananda Aluthgamage and the Governor of the Central Bank, Ajith
Nivard Cabraal who served as the Co-Chairmen of the Bid Organizing
Committee while political representation from the Hambantota District,
Namal Rajapaksa and the President of the Commonwealth Games Association
(CGA) of Sri Lanka, Hemasiri Fernando provided keen support.
In addition, several other key Government officials,the GA for
Hambantota, Sports Administrators, IT Specialists, Architects, Event
Organizers, Airline Crew,a Medical Doctor,Foreign consultants and the
necessary support staff provided the different services required to
carry out a complex bid of this nature.
In that context, it may be useful to recall that the bid covers not
just the Games and sports, but also 14 other varied themes, all of which
are given high priority by the CGF and the CGAs.
In the run-up to the final phase, and in the face of a very strong
bid from Gold Coast, the Bid Organizing Committee also had to deal with,
and respond to, a few contentious issues as well. These included the
claim made by some persons that Sri Lanka does not have the financial
capacity and sports experience that a highly developed, sports-oriented
country like Australia possesses. It was also pointed out that Australia
had vast experience in staging Games of this magnitude, and therefore
suggested that Gold Coast was "event-ready" in sports infrastructure,
while Hanbantota had to build its infrastructure over the next few
years, and that posed a risk to the Games.
Hence, a differentiation strategy had to be implemented by the OC to
promote the Hambantota bid, by showing that the hosting of the Games
would provide an opportunity for rapid economic development,
reconciliation, and nation-rebuilding in Sri Lanka. The OC also
contended that the bid and hosting of the Games in Hambantota would
promote equality and inclusiveness within the Commonwealth nations, and
suggested that it is now time for the Commonwealth to promote more
opportunities in newly emerging countries, in keeping with their stated
objective of encouraging equality, humanity and destiny within all
Commonwealth nations. The OC also reiterated that the overall impact of
the Games being held in Sri Lanka will be far greater than if the Games
were held in Australia, which contention too, was quite favourably
received by many nations. The OC further explained that the CGF and CGAs
choose a city for the Games with a lead time of 7 years because they
give high weightage to the capacity of a city to "get ready" in the
ensuing period, instead of being too strongly guided as to whether a
City is currently "event ready" to host the Games. In addition, in all
its presentations,the OC, stated that hosting the Games could be
described as a life-changing opportunity for any Host Country, and that
both Gold Coast - Australia and Hambantota - Sri Lanka have acknowledged
that hosting the Games will be a life changing event for each city and
country. In that context, the OC reminded all CGAs that, up to that
time, Australia had hosted 4 Commonwealth Games, and hence benefited
from four "life changing"opportunities, and therefore invited the CGAs
to give Sri Lanka its first opportunity in 2018.
Through these and other arguments, the OC attempted to convince the
voting Commonwealth Games Association (CGA's) vote for Hambantota, while
also reaffirming at all times, the commitment and capacity of Sri Lanka
to host the Games in a professional manner, and to deliver Games on time
and on budget.
In the final analysis, it was clear that these submissions of the OC
had an impact on many CGA members, although collectively it was not
sufficient to give Hambantota the required majority to win the bid.
Accordingly, while Hambantota, Sri Lanka received 27 votes, Gold Coast,
Australia received 43 votes and won the hosting rights. Nevertheless,
Sri Lanka's effort was hailed as a remarkable and outstanding bid, and
received positive publicity from global sports administrators, world
media and others.
In conclusion, the OC wishes to record with satisfaction that
Hambantota's unique Sports City has now been hailed as a "blue print"
for future sports cities in the world, and as a highly practical and
outstanding concept, by the CGF Evaluation Commission. Such a public
acknowledgement could pave the way for future international level Games
to be organized and hosted in Hambantota and in Sri Lanka. Hence, the OC
wishes to recommend to the Government, that efforts be pursued in the
future to enable Sri Lanka to benefit by the economic and sporting
benefits of being acknowledged as a nation that is seriously supporting
sporting activities in the world.
It may also be useful to note that Sports has been estimated as a US$
242 billion per annum industry, which is why many countries today
compete fiercely to give themselves increasing proportions of that
massive economic activity. In that connection, the comments of three
persons connected to the bid in different ways, may be worthy of
reflection and repetition. Firstly,the comments of the outgoing CGF
President, Mike Fennell, who stated that, "Hambantota was a very strong
bid ... This time Gold Coast was successful, but I hope Hambantota
considers bidding again ...". Secondly, the remarks of Queensland
Premier, Anna Bligh who summed up the Hambantota bid, by saying,
"Twenty-seven countries in the Commonwealth believed Hambantota was the
best bid, and I think that's a great credit to them". Thirdly, a quote
from Malaysia's Prince Tunku Imran, the new Commonwealth Games
Federation (CGF) President who said: "Sri Lanka has demonstrated quite
clearly that a country like Sri Lanka does have the capability of
hosting the Games. As a Federation, we have to encourage others by
convincing them there are real benefits of hosting the Games."
|